A Spatio-temporal Bayesian Network Approach for Revealing Functional Ecological Networks in Fisheries

  • Neda Trifonova
  • Daniel Duplisea
  • Andrew Kenny
  • Allan Tucker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8819)


Ecosystems consist of complex dynamic interactions among species and the environment, the understanding of which has implications for predicting the environmental response to changes in climate and biodiversity. Machine learning techniques can allow such complex, spatially varying interactions to be recovered from collected field data. In this study, we apply structure learning techniques to identify functional relationships between trophic groups of species that vary across space and time. Specifically, Bayesian networks are created on a window of data for each of the 20 geographically different and temporally varied sub-regions within an oceanic area. In addition, we explored the spatial and temporal variation of pre-defined functions (like predation, competition) that are generalisable by experts’ knowledge. We were able to discover meaningful ecological networks that were more precisely spatially-specific rather than temporally, as previously suggested for this region. To validate the discovered networks, we predict the biomass of the trophic groups by using dynamic Bayesian networks, and correcting for spatial autocorrelation by including a spatial node in our models.


Bayesian Network Functional Relationship Directed Acyclic Graph Spatial Cluster Trophic Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aderhold, A., Husmeier, D., Lennon, J.J., Beale, C.M., Smith, V.A.: Hierarchical Bayesian models in ecology: Reconstructing species interaction networks from non-homogeneous species abundance data. Ecological Informatics 11, 55–64 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chickering, D.M., Geiger, D., Heckerman, D., et al.: Learning Bayesian networks is NP-hard. Tech. rep., Citeseer (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doubleday, W.: Manual on groundfish surveys in the Northwest Atlantic. Tech. rep., NAFO (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunne, J.A., Williams, R.J., Martinez, N.D.: Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters 5(4), 558–567 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duplisea, D.E., Castonguay, M.: Comparison and utility of different size-based metrics of fish communities for detecting fishery impacts. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63(4), 810–820 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M., Wyner, A.: Data analysis with Bayesian networks: A bootstrap approach. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 196–205. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frisk, M.G., Duplisea, D.E., Trenkel, V.M.: Exploring the abundance-occupancy relationships for the Georges Bank finfish and shellfish community from 1963 to 2006. Ecological Applications 21(1), 227–240 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M., Greenwood, J.J., Gregory, R.D., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H.: Abundance–occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology 37(s1), 39–59 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartigan, J.A., Wong, M.A.: Algorithm as 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics, 100–108 (1979)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., Chickering, D.M.: Learning Bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data. Machine Learning 20(3), 197–243 (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiao, Y.: Regime shift in marine ecosystems and implications for fisheries management, a review. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 19(2), 177–191 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Milns, I., Beale, C.M., Smith, V.A.: Revealing ecological networks using Bayesian network inference algorithms. Ecology 91(7), 1892–1899 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., Walker, B.: Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413(6856), 591–596 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwarz, G., et al.: Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6(2), 461–464 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neda Trifonova
    • 1
  • Daniel Duplisea
    • 2
  • Andrew Kenny
    • 3
  • Allan Tucker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceBrunel UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.Fisheries and OceansCanada
  3. 3.Centre for EnvironmentFisheries and Aquaculture ScienceLowestoftUK

Personalised recommendations