Abstract
While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for research, many research questions cannot be ethically and practically answered using an RCT. Comparative effectiveness research (CER) techniques are often better suited than RCTs to address the effects of an intervention under routine care conditions, an outcome otherwise known as effectiveness. CER research techniques covered in this section include: effectiveness-oriented experimental studies such as pragmatic trials and cluster randomized trials, treatment response heterogeneity, observational and database studies including adjustment techniques such as sensitivity analysis and propensity score analysis, systematic reviews and meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. Each section describes the technique and covers the strengths and weaknesses of the approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pear R (2009) US to compare medical treatments. The New York Times, 16 Feb 2009
GovTrack HR (2009) Patient protection and affordable care act. In: 3590–111th congress. Accessed 25 Feb 2014. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3590
Johnston S, Rootenberg J, Katrak S, Smith W, Elkins J (2006) Effect of a US national institutes of health programme of clinical trials on public health and costs. Lancet 367(9519):1319–1327
National Advisory Heart Council (1967) Organization, review and administration of cooperative studies (Greenberg Report)
Hunsberger S, Albert PS, London WB (2009) A finite mixture survival model to characterize risk groups of neuroblastoma. Stat Med 28(8):1301–1314
Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2014) http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed 25 Feb 2014
Welcome to ACS NSQIP (2014) http://site.acsnsqip.org/. Accessed 25 Feb 2014
National Cancer Data Base (2014) http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/. Accessed 25 Feb 2014
Data and Software for Researchers (2014) Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program http://seer.cancer.gov/resources/. Accessed 25 Feb 2014
Taubman SL, Allen HL, Wright BJ, Baicker K, Finkelstein AN (2014) Medicaid increases emergency-department use: evidence from Oregon’s Health Insurance Experiment. Science (New York, NY) 343(6168):263–268
Tan HJ, Norton EC, Ye Z, Hafez KS, Gore JL, Miller DC (2012) Long-term survival following partial versus radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 307(15):1629–1635
Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ (2012) Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: american college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST J 141(2_suppl):7S–47S
The Cochrane Collaboration (2014) http://us.cochrane.org/cochrane-collaboration. Accessed 25 Feb 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kinnier, C.V., Chung, J.W., Bilimoria, K.Y. (2015). Approaches to Answering Critical CER Questions. In: Bilimoria, K., Minami, C., Mahvi, D. (eds) Comparative Effectiveness in Surgical Oncology. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 164. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12552-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12553-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)