Skip to main content

Comparing Means of Independent Samples

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1557 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews the independent-samples t-test and the one-way analysis of variance, inferential statistics that are commonly used to test null and alternative hypotheses about mean differences among independent populations. Because both procedures assume equal population variances, Levene’s test for homogeneity of variances is discussed, as are methods for hypothesis testing when homogeneity of variances cannot be safely assumed. The chapter continues by using a measure of effect size, partial eta squared, to distinguish between statistical and clinical significance, and concludes with a discussion of post hoc multiple comparisons and contrast analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Data Sets and References

  1. CDC BRFSS.sav obtained from: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (2005). Public domain. For more information about the BRFSS, visit http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/. Accessed 16 Nov 2014

  2. Framingham.sav obtained from: Dupont, W.D.: Statistical Modeling for Biomedical Researchers, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009). (With the kind permission of Sean Coady, National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute)

    Google Scholar 

  3. From: Barker, S., Jerome, J., Woods, D., Zaika, C., Brown, R.G., Holmes, W.H.: The Sit and Reach Test as a Measure of Flexibility for Predicting Lower Extremity Injury in Division III Athletes. Unpublished data. Le Moyne College, Syracuse (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William H. Holmes .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmes, W., Rinaman, W. (2014). Comparing Means of Independent Samples. In: Statistical Literacy for Clinical Practitioners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12550-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics