Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Climate ((SPCL))

  • 1106 Accesses

Abstract

Research on human-induced climate change has a long history. The Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius quantified the impact of the infrared absorption capacity of the greenhouse gas CO2 as early as 1896. He pointed out that cutting its concentration in the earth’s atmosphere by half would produce an ice age, while doubling the concentration would result in a warming of 5–6 °C (Arrhenius 1896). After almost a century of further scientific analysis, the US National Academy of Sciences was asked by the US government administration to assess the scientific basis concerning the projection of possible future climate change resulting from anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. The respective report (Charney et al. 1979) found that a doubling of the earth’s atmospheric CO2 concentration was associated with a temperature increase of 1.5–4.5 °C, an assessment that has been repeatedly reconfirmed since. The report also concluded, that “it appears that the warming will eventually occur, and the associated regional climatic changes so important to the assessment of socioeconomic consequences may well be significant, but unfortunately the latter cannot yet be adequately projected” (Charney et al. 1979, p. 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This range for the Alpine region refers to the “likely” range, i.e. the 17–83 ‰. To be fully comparable with the global temperature range given by IPCC, which refers to the 5–95 ‰, the range for the Alpine region would be larger.

  2. 2.

    The three most often applied Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) to date are DICE (Dynamic Integrated Climate and Economy), PAGE (Policy Analysis of the Greenhouse Effect), and FUND (Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation, and Distribution), with model descriptions given by Nordhaus (1991, 2011) and Hope (2006)—on which the Stern review is based (Stern 2007)—and Tol 2002a, b, respectively. They are used to provide total net present values for future damage over time and to estimate the marginal social costs of carbon (the damage cost of an extra tonne of GHG emissions). Their use to this end has been questioned, most importantly for arbitrary parameter choice in social welfare functions, ill-founded climate sensitivity (the temperature increase a GHG doubling implies), arbitrary and non-empirical based climate damage functions (usually a functional relationship between temperature increase and (regional) GDP loss, for FUND also distinguishing individual sectors), and neglect of consideration of possible catastrophic outcomes. For a detailed discussion see Pindyck (2013).

References

  • APCC (Austrian Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Austrian assessment report 2014. Summary for policy makers, Österreichischer Sachstandsbericht Klimawandel. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaheim A, Amundsen H, Dokken T, Wei T (2012) Impacts and adaptation to climate change in European economies. Global Environ Change 22(4):959–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius S (1896) On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philos Mag J Sci Ser 5(41):237–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosello F, Eboli F, Parrado R, Nunes PALD, Ding H, Rosa R (2011) The economic assessment of changes in ecosystem services: an application of the CGE methodology. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales 11(1):161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney JG, Arakawa A, Baker DJ, Bolin B, Dickinson RE, Goody RM, Leith CE, Stommel HM, Wunsch CI (1979) Carbon dioxide and climate: a scientific assessment. Report of an ad hoc study group on carbon dioxide and climate. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciscar J-C, Iglesias A, Feyen L, Szabó L, Van Regemorter D, Amelung B, Nicholls R, Watkiss P, Christensen OB, Dankers R, Garrote L, Goodess CM, Hunt A, Moreno A, Richards J, Soria A (2011) Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(7):2678–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciscar J-C, Szabó L, van Regemorter D, Soria A (2012) The integration of PESETA sectoral economic impacts into the GEM-E3 Europe model: methodology and results. Clim Change 112(1):127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission (2009) Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action, White paper of the Commission of the European Communities, COM(2009) 147 final. EU Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environment Agency) (2008) Impacts of Europe’s changing climate—2008 indicator-based assessment, Joint EEA-JRC-WHO report, EEA report 4/2008. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environment Agency) (2012) Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe, EEA report 12/2012. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON Climate (2013) Climate change and territorial effects on regions and local economies, Final report, ESPON and IRPUD. TU Dortmund, Dortmund

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope C (2006) The marginal impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating IPCC’s five reasons for concern. Integr Assess 6(1):19–56

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Working Group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, working group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob D, Peterson J, Eggert B et al (2013) EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2

  • Metroeconomica (2004) Costing the impacts of climate change in the UK: overview of guidelines, UKCIP technical report. UKCIP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (1991) To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101(407):920–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (2011) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: background and results from the RICE-2011 model. National bureau of economic research working paper 17540

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS (2013) Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J Econ Lit 51(3):860–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tol R (2002a) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, Part I: Benchmark estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(1):47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol R (2002b) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, Part II: Dynamic estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(2):135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2010) The Cancun agreements, United Nations framework convention on climate change. http://unfccc.int/meetings/cancun_nov_2010/meeting/6266.php

  • Watkiss P (ed) (2011) The ClimateCost project. Final report. Volume 1: Europe. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (1979) Declaration of the world climate conference. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2013) Turn down the heat: climate extremes, regional impacts, and the case for resilience. A report for the World Bank by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Climate Analytics. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this research by the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund for the project COIN, carried out within the Austrian Climate Research Programme (ACRP) is thankfully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl W. Steininger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steininger, K.W. (2015). Introduction. In: Steininger, K., König, M., Bednar-Friedl, B., Kranzl, L., Loibl, W., Prettenthaler, F. (eds) Economic Evaluation of Climate Change Impacts. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12457-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics