Skip to main content

An Alternative Operational Risk Methodology for Regulatory Capital Calculation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Bayesian Statistics

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 118))

  • 2222 Accesses

Abstract

The main objective of this work is to suggest a new method for calculation of regulatory capital required for operational risk as an alternative to the corresponding version advocated by the Basel Committee of Banking Supervision. Our method takes into account genuine dependence among the losses of possible risk units within a financial institution. Our proposal reduces the amount of regulatory capital suggested by Basel Committee, where the risk units are assumed to be perfectly positive-dependent. A simulation study is performed to compare both approaches. Finally, we discuss when Bayesian methods are preferable to the classical ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alexander, C.: Operational risk: Regulation, Analysis and Management. Pearson Education, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, C.: Statistical models of operational loss. In: Fabozzi, F.G. (ed.) Handbook of Finance, Vol. 1, pp. 129–171 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basel Committee of Banking Supervision. International convergence of capital measurements and capital standards: a revised framework—comprehensive version (2006). http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs128.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec. 2014

  4. Basel Committee of Banking Supervision. RCAP assessment of Basel regulations in Brazil (December 2013). http://www.bcb.gov.br/pec/appron/apres/RCAP_Brazil_assessment_report.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec. 2014

  5. Embrechts, P., Puccetti, G.: Aggregating risk capital, with an application to operational risk. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review , 31(2)(2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frachot, A., Georges, P., Roncalli, T.: Loss distribution approach for operational risk. Working paper, GRO, Credit Lyonnais (2001). www.thierry-roncalli.com. Accessed 29 Dec. 2014

  7. Frachot, A., Roncalli, T., Salomon, E.: The correlation problem in operational risk. Preprint, Credit Agricole (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giacometti, R., Rachev, S., Chernobai, A., Bertocchi, M.: Aggregation issues in operational risk. The Journal of Operational Risk (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McNeil, A., Frey, L., Embrechts, P.: Quantitative Risk Management. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, M. S.: Bayesian approaches to copula modelling. eprint arXiv:1112.4204 (2011). http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4204v1.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec. 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Nikolai Kolev, IME-USP, for numerous helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guaraci Requena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Requena, G., Delbem, D., Diniz, C. (2015). An Alternative Operational Risk Methodology for Regulatory Capital Calculation. In: Polpo, A., Louzada, F., Rifo, L., Stern, J., Lauretto, M. (eds) Interdisciplinary Bayesian Statistics. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12454-4_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics