Advertisement

The Gamma-Ray Back-Scattering Method

  • V. I. FerronskyEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Springer Geophysics book series (SPRINGERGEOPHYS)

Abstract

The functional relationship between scattering gamma-radiation and the density of a medium is the basis of this discussed method. The chief parameters that govern the practical usefulness of a given method, namely, its sensitivity to density changes and its resolution in depth are considered. These parameters depend on the probe length (axial distance between the source and the detector) and the gamma-ray energy. There are three different types of gamma-ray density gauges: surface-type probe, well-logging probe and a probe on the rod inserting directly into the soil. The principal difference between the various types is in the design of the measuring probe. A number of designs for surface-type probes are available. Mass-produced logging equipment has been widely used by geophysicists for density measurements in wells. At a relatively small depth (up to 25 m) the density can be conveniently determined by inserting a rod probe directly into the ground. Technological aspects of measurement and calibration are discussed.

Keywords

Scattered Radiation Probe Length 137Cs Source Concrete Plate Ground Ground 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bulatov BL, Leypunskiy OI (1959) Gamma-ray albedo and buildup factor on reflection. At Energy 7:21–25Google Scholar
  2. Dubinchuk VT (1966) Maximum working depth in studies of ground density by the gamma-gamma method. In: Proc. 10th Conference of Junior Scientists and Engineers at VSEGINGEO, Moscow, pp 24–29Google Scholar
  3. Dyad’kin IG (1955) On the theory of gamma-gamma logging of wells. Izv AN SSSR Ser Geofiz 4:323–331Google Scholar
  4. Emelyanov VA (1962) Gamma rays and neutrons in field soil-melioration studies. Atomizdat, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferronsky VI (1958) Methods of determination the density and moisture content of grounds. In: Mechanized compaction of grounds in construction practice. Gosstroyizdat, Moscow, pp 33–39Google Scholar
  6. Ferronsky VI, Danilin AI, Dubinchuk VT et al (1968) Radioactive investigative methods in engineering geology and hydrogeology. Atomizdat, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  7. Filippov EM (1962) Applied nuclear geophysics. USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  8. Filippov EM, Kuznetsov GA (1959) Determination of the density of rocks and ores, in exposures and excavations, using gamma-ray scattering. Razvedka i Okhrana Nedr 9:11–17Google Scholar
  9. Korablev ЛН (1956) A portable radiometric device BK-3. Device Instrum Exp 3:18–21Google Scholar
  10. Makarov RA, Basin YaN (1961) Radioisotope methods of measurement in the construction industry. NIIOMTP, TsBTI, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. Ochkur AP (1957) Density logging. In: Problems in Mining Geophysics. Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, pp 62–68Google Scholar
  12. Verbovenko IG, Fakidov IG (1958) Discussion on gamma-gamma logging. At Energy 4:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Volarovich MP, Churayev NV (1960) Investigation of peat using radioactive isotopes. USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  14. Voskoboynikov GM (1957) Theoretical foundations of selective gamma-gamma logging. Izn AN SSSR Ser Geofiz 3:351–362Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations