Skip to main content

Sampling Inspection by Variables with an Additional Acceptance Criterion

  • Chapter
Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 11

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control ((FSQC))

  • 1508 Accesses

Abstract

We deal with sampling inspection by variables, i.e. acceptance sampling procedures wherein the acceptability of a lot is statistically established from the measurement results of a specified continuous variable X obtained at the items in a sample from the lot. An item is qualified as nonconforming if its measured quality characteristic x is larger than a defined upper specification limit U. We accept the lot if \(\bar{x} + k\sigma \leq U\) or \(\bar{x} + \mathit{ks} \leq U\) in the case of known or unknown lot standard deviation σ, respectively, where \(\bar{x}\) and s are mean and standard deviation of a sample of size n drawn at random from the lot and k is an acceptance constant given as a parameter of the sampling plan.In some cases the acceptance procedure is extended by an additional limit \(U^{\star } = U+\varDelta\) with \(\varDelta \in \mathbb{R}\) that must not be exceeded by any of the measurements \(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n}\), i.e. for acceptance of the lot the largest measurement result \(x_{(n)} =\max (x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})\) must be less or equal to \(U^{\star }\), \(x_{(n)} \leq U^{\star } = U +\varDelta.\) Of course, with this additional requirement for acceptance the probability of acceptance of the lot is smaller than without it for each fraction p of nonconforming items in the lot.Such extended sampling plans are, e.g., used for the evaluation of bacterial contamination in foods, the amount of active ingredient used in formulating drug products and the strength of concrete.The OC function of these extended sampling plans for inspection by variables is derived and the advantages/disadvantages in comparison with unextended sampling plans are discussed. It turns out that especially in the case of “known” σ plans the extended sampling plans protect against a true standard deviation that is larger than the value being used in the acceptance criterion \(\bar{x} + k\sigma \leq U\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If a lower specification limit L is defined, the additional limit is L  = LΔ. The lot is accepted if \(\bar{x} - k\sigma \geq L\) or \(\bar{x} -\mathit{ks} \geq L\), respectively, and \(x_{(1)} =\min (x_{1},\ldots,x_{n}) \geq L^{\star }\)

References

  • Bray, D. F., Lyon, D. A., & Burr, I. W. (1973). Three class attributes plans in acceptance sampling. Technometrics, 15, 575–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEB-FIP (1978). Model code for concrete structures Vol’s I and II, (3rd ed.). (pp. 124–125/273) Paris: Bulletin d’information CEB

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, S. (2003). Microbiological sampling plans–statistical aspects. SGLH tagung microbiological food safety, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, S. (2004). Stichprobenpläne und mikrobiologische Kriterien als Risikomanagement-Option in neuen Konzepten zur Lebensmittelsicherheit. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wschenschr, 117, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, S., & Hildebrandt, G. (1998). Some remarks on the design of three-class sampling plans. Journal of Food Protection, 61, 757–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines, EDQM (2010). European Pharmacopoeia 7.4, Section 2.9.40 “Uniformity of Dosage Units”, pp. 4101–4103.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Standard EN 206-1 (2000). Concrete – Part 1: Specification, performance, production and conformity. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, G., Böhmer, L., & Dahms, S. (1995). Three-class attributes plans in microbiological quality control: a contribution to the discussion. Journal of Food Protection, 58, 784–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICMSF (2002). Microrganisms in foods 7. microbiological testing in food safety management. Chapter 7 (Sampling Plans) pp. 123–165. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Legan, J. D., Vandeven, M. H., Dahms, S., & Cole, M. B. (2001). Determining the concentration of microorganisms controlled by attributes sampling plans. Food Control, 12, 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, A. T. (1935). The distribution of the difference between the extreme observation and the sample mean in samples of n from a normal universe. Biometrika, 27, 466–471.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, E. G., & Neubauer, D. V. (2009). Acceptance sampling in quality control (2nd ed.), Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Taerwe, L. (1988). Evaluation of compound compliance criteria for concrete strength. Materials and Structures, 21, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verordnung über Hygiene- und Qualitätsanforderungen an Milch und Erzeugnisse auf Milchbasis (Milchverordnung) vom 24. April 1995, (BGBl. I, 544).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilrich, P.-Th., Weiss, H. (2011). Three-class sampling plans for the evaluation of bacterial contamination. Milchwissenschaft, 66, 413–416.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter-Th. Wilrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilrich, PT. (2015). Sampling Inspection by Variables with an Additional Acceptance Criterion. In: Knoth, S., Schmid, W. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 11. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12355-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics