Skip to main content

Unifying Duality Theorems for Width Parameters in Graphs and Matroids (Extended Abstract)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 8747))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We prove a general duality theorem for width parameters in combinatorial structures such as graphs and matroids. It implies the classical such theorems for path-width, tree-width, branch-width and rank-width, and gives rise to new width parameters with associated duality theorems. The dense substructures witnessing large width are presented in a unified way akin to tangles, as orientations of separation systems satisfying certain consistency axioms.

This is an extended abstract of arXiv:1406.3797, which contains all the proofs omitted here. See also arXiv:1406.3798 for further work in this direction.

Sang-il Oum: Supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2011-0011653).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, we need even less. It would be enough to consider instead of ‘separations’ any poset with an involution that commutes with its ordering, just as the ordering of separations introduced below satisfies \((A,B)\le (C,D) \Leftrightarrow (B,A)\ge (D,C)\). It is only for the sake of readability that we are writing this paper in terms of separations, as readers are likely to have graphs or matroids in mind.

  2. 2.

    Our notational convention will be that we think of \((A,B)\) as pointing towards \(B\).

  3. 3.

    It is a good idea to work with this formal definition of consistency, since the more intuitive notion of ‘pointing away from each other’ can be counterintuitive. For example, we shall need that no consistent set of separations of \(V\) contains a separation of the form \((V,A)\); this follows readily from the formal definition, as \((A,V)\le (V,A)\), but is less obvious from the informal.

  4. 4.

    This will help us show that \((T,\alpha ')\) is over \(\mathcal F\) if \((T,\alpha )\) is.

  5. 5.

    This will help us show that \((T,\alpha ')\) is rooted in \(S^-\) if \((T,\alpha )\) is.

  6. 6.

    For example, we do not need Menger’s theorem, as all the other proofs do.

  7. 7.

    In our matroid terminology we follow Oxley [9].

References

  1. Amini, O., Mazoit, F., Nisse, N., Thomassé, S.: Submodular partition functions. Discrete Appl. Math. 309(20), 6000–6008 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bienstock, D., Robertson, N., Seymour, P., Thomas, R.: Quickly excluding a forest. J. Combin. Theor. Ser. B 52(2), 274–283 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Diestel, R.: Graph Theory, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Geelen, J., Gerards, B., Robertson, N., Whittle, G.: Obstructions to branch-decomposition of matroids. J. Combin. Theor. Ser. B 96, 560–570 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hliněný, P., Whittle, G.: Matroid tree-width. European J. Combin. 27(7), 1117–1128 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hliněný, P., Whittle, G.: Addendum to matroid tree-width. European J. Combin. 30, 1036–1044 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Mazoit, F.: A simple proof of the tree-width duality theorem. arXiv:1309.2266 (2013)

  8. Oum, S., Seymour, P.: Approximating clique-width and branch-width. J. Combin. Theor. Ser. B 96(4), 514–528 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Oxley, J.: Matroid Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson, N., Seymour, P.: Graph minors. X. Obstructions to tree-decomposition. J. Combin. Theor. Ser. B 52, 153–190 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Seymour, P., Thomas, R.: Graph searching and a min-max theorem for tree-width. J. Combin. Theor. Ser. B 58(1), 22–33 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Seymour, P., Thomas, R.: Call routing and the ratcatcher. Combinatorica 14(2), 217–241 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Diestel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Diestel, R., Oum, Si. (2014). Unifying Duality Theorems for Width Parameters in Graphs and Matroids (Extended Abstract). In: Kratsch, D., Todinca, I. (eds) Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science. WG 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8747. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12340-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12340-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12339-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12340-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics