Skip to main content

N3 Bias Field Correction Explained as a Bayesian Modeling Method

  • Conference paper
Bayesian and grAphical Models for Biomedical Imaging

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8677))

Abstract

Although N3 is perhaps the most widely used method for MRI bias field correction, its underlying mechanism is in fact not well understood. Specifically, the method relies on a relatively heuristic recipe of alternating iterative steps that does not optimize any particular objective function. In this paper we explain the successful bias field correction properties of N3 by showing that it implicitly uses the same generative models and computational strategies as expectation maximization (EM) based bias field correction methods. We demonstrate experimentally that purely EM-based methods are capable of producing bias field correction results comparable to those of N3 in less computation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wells, W.M., Grimson, W.E.L., Kinikis, R., Jolesz, F.A.: Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 15(4), 429–442 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Held, K., Kops, E., Krause, B., Wells, W., Kikinis, R., Muller-Gartner, H.: Markov random field segmentation of brain MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16(6), 878–886 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P.: Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(10), 885 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P.: Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(10), 897–908 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pham, D., Prince, J.: Adaptive fuzzy segmentation of magnetic resonance images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(9), 737–752 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Y., Brady, M., Smith, S.: Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 20(1), 45–57 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashburner, J., Friston, K.J.: Unified segmentation. NeuroImage 26(3), 839–851 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 39(1), 1–38 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Sled, J.G., Zijdenbos, A.P., Evans, A.C.: A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 17(1), 87–97 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Minka, T.P.: Expectation-maximization as lower bound maximization (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boyes, R.G., Gunter, J.L., Frost, C., Janke, A.L., Yeatman, T., Hill, D.L., Bernstein, M.A., Thompson, P.M., Weiner, M.W., Schuff, N., Alexander, G.E., Killiany, R.J., DeCarli, C., Jack, C.R., Fox, N.C.: Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils. NeuroImage 39(4), 1752–1762 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Likar, B., Viergever, M.A., Pernus, F.: Retrospective correction of MR intensity inhomogeneity by information minimization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 20(12), 1398–1410 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng, W., Chee, M.W., Zagorodnov, V.: Improvement of brain segmentation accuracy by optimizing non-uniformity correction using N3. NeuroImage 48(1), 73–83 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tustison, N., Avants, B., Cook, P., Zheng, Y., Egan, A., Yushkevich, P., Gee, J.: N4ITK: Improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 29(6), 1310–1320 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Larsen, C.T., Iglesias, J.E., Van Leemput, K. (2014). N3 Bias Field Correction Explained as a Bayesian Modeling Method. In: Cardoso, M.J., Simpson, I., Arbel, T., Precup, D., Ribbens, A. (eds) Bayesian and grAphical Models for Biomedical Imaging. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12289-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12289-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12288-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12289-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics