Skip to main content

Intentionality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 734 Accesses

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 118))

Abstract

This chapter presents a taxonomy of the sorts of mental events that explain the why behind actions—paradigmatically, the agent ’s beliefs and desires . First, there are propositional attitudes : These sorts of mental states are formulated in terms of an agent ’s attitude toward a proposition . Such a mental state that has content is also called an intentional state: For instance, emotions are intentional state, and this differentiates them from sensations such as pain and from moods such as being sad, brooding or cheerful. In this chapter, I describe mind as a jigsaw puzzle —a puzzle without borders which can grow indefinitely. Each new belief must find a place where it fits with adjacent beliefs and also coheres with the emerging picture. The second part of this chapter is aimed to describe the place of these mental states in agency. A desire -belief pair allows rationalizing the action: This is the reason I could give if someone asked me—Why did you do this? Donald Davidson, in his Causal Theory of Action, went one dramatic step further: He contended that this reason is also the real cause of the action. In other words, the reason of an action causes this action, like insulin causes a decrease in blood glucose. The realization of an action is connected to a set of pertinent mental states , the person acting after having all well considered. This conception of action eschews deterministic laws, but does acknowledge the force of mechanisms, in a quasi-physiology of Mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Conventionally, Searle writes the words Intentionality, Intentional, etc., with a capital I.

  2. 2.

    An exception which proves the rule is the existence of strict liability laws: In such cases, intentions are explicitly excluded from consideration of culpability. Only the outcome is relevant in strict liability cases, for example, making false statements on a loan application. I am grateful to John Meyers for this remark.

References

  • Anscombe GEM. Intention. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, DeWall CN, Zhang L. How emotion shapes behaviour: feedback, anticipation, and reflexion, rather than direct causation. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;11:167–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower GH, Forgas JP. Affect, memory and social cognition. In: Kihlstrom JF, Bower GH, Forgas JP, Niedenthal PM, editors. Cognition and emotion counterpoints: cognition, memory and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore GL, Gasper K. Feeling is believing: some affective influences on belief. In: Fridja NH, Manstead ASR, Bem S, editors. Emotions and beliefs, how feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D. Actions, reasons and causes. J Philos 1963; 60: 685–700. Reprinted In: Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D. Two paradoxes of irrationality. In: Wollheim R, Hopkins J. editors. Philosophical essays on Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 289–305. Reprinted In: Problems of rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza R. The rationality of emotion. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descombes V. Les Institutions du sens, Éditions de Minuit, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokic J, Engel P. Ramsey, Vérité et succès, P.U.F., collection Philosophies; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. Getting hooked, rationality and addictions. In: Elster J, Skog O-J, editors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. Alchemies of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. Strong feelings, emotion, addiction and human behavior. The 1997 Jean Nicod lectures, A Bradford book. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel P. Les croyances. In: Notions de Philosophie, under the direction of D. Kamboucher, Éditions folio, Gallimard; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel P, editor. Believing and accepting. Philosophical studies series. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridja NH, Mesquita B. Beliefs through emotions. In: Fridja NH, Manstead ASR, Bem S, editors. Emotions and beliefs, how feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil J. Philosophy of mind, a contemporary introduction. London: Routledge; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D. A treatise of human nature, 1.3.7; 1740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW. Monadology, 1698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livet P. Émotions et rationalité morale. P. U. F., Collection Sociologies; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001;127:267–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losonsky M, Jean-Pierre Dupuy JP. In: Engel P, editor. Believing and accepting. Philosophical studies series. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslin KT. An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R. The nature of rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogien R. La Faiblesse de la volonté. P.U.F.; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears D. The goals and strategies of self-deception. In: Elster J, editor. The multiple self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharo P. Raison et civilisation, essai sur les chances de rationalisation morale de la société. Cerf; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey F. Philosophical papers. In: Mellor DH, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B. Human society in ethics and politics. London: Allen and Unwin; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J. Intentionality, an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykocinski OE, Pittman TS, Tuttle ES. Inaction inertia: foregoing future benefits as a result of an initial failure to act. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;8:793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L. On certainty, 141, 142; 1951–1952, published 1969. http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/wittgenstein03.htm. Accessed 7 May 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Reach .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reach, G. (2015). Intentionality . In: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long-Term Therapies. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12265-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics