Advertisement

Practical Goal Modeling for Enterprise Change Context: A Problem Statement

  • Sagar Sunkle
  • Hemant Rathod
  • Vinay Kulkarni
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8823)

Abstract

Modern enterprise need to rapidly respond to changes. Goal modeling techniques are intuitive mechanisms that help in modeling and analyzing rationale behind enterprise’s response to change. In spite of their intuitiveness, there are several challenges that need to be addressed for their practical adoption and application. We present a problem statement based on real world case study and possible ways in which these challenges can be addressed.

Keywords

Goal Modeling Strategy Making Organizational Hierarchy Course of Action 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sunkle, S., Kulkarni, V., Roychoudhury, S.: Intentional Modeling for Problem Solving in Enterprise Architecture. In: Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L.A., Cordeiro, J., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) ICEIS (3), pp. 267–274. SciTePress (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sunkle, S., Roychoudhury, S., Kulkarni, V.: Using Intentional and System Dynamics Modeling to Address WHYs in Enterprise Architecture. In: Cordeiro, J., Marca, D.A., van Sinderen, M. (eds.) ICSOFT, pp. 24–31. SciTePress (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quartel, D.A.C., Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.: A Goal-Oriented Requirements Modelling Language for Enterprise Architecture. In: EDOC, pp. 3–13. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quartel, D., Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H.: ArchiMate ® Extension for Modeling and Managing Motivation, Principles and Requirements in TOGAFTTM (October 2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horkoff, J., Yu, E.S.K.: Comparison and Evaluation of Goal-oriented Satisfaction Analysis Techniques. Requir. Eng. 18(3), 199–222 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lapouchnian, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Capturing Contextual Variability in i* Models. In: de Castro, J.B., Franch, X., Mylopoulos, J., Yu, E.S.K. (eds.) iStar. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 766, pp. 96–101. CEUR-WS.org (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Regev, G., Wegmann, A.: Where do Goals Come from: the Underlying Principles of Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering. In: RE, pp. 353–362. IEEE Computer Society (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    OMG: Business Motivation Model - Version 1.1. (May 2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mao, X., Yu, E.: Organizational and Social Concepts in Agent Oriented Software Engineering. In: Odell, J.J., Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) AOSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3382, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, E.S.: Social Modeling and i*. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 99–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kavakli, E.: Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Unifying Framework. Requir. Eng. 6(4), 237–251 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: A Semantic Foundation for Role-Related Concepts in Enterprise Modelling. In: EDOC, pp. 31–40. IEEE Computer Society (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sagar Sunkle
    • 1
  • Hemant Rathod
    • 1
  • Vinay Kulkarni
    • 1
  1. 1.Tata Research Development and Design CenterTata Consultancy ServicesPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations