Skip to main content

The Public, Private, and “Stepping on Toes” in Healthcare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Public Health ((BRIEFSPUHEAET))

Abstract

What is public and what is private? Systems can be seen as exchanges and feedbacks of energies. Those energies certainly may be heat. They may be kinetic. They might be based on discourse. The energies could perhaps manifest as the directives and choices made by individuals in the public. Public health as a mission seeks to save collective lives from often avoidable premature mortality and morbidity. And those private “lives” that we wish to affect can then be collected together as the “population” of interest, or a public. We let the words, public health, roll off our tongues with ease. But how often do we take time to understand the ontological meaning of “public?” Discovering “publics” would be quite at home with Aristotle. But how often do health professionals take a moment to give the philosophical less than a fleeting thought. This chapter supports a deeper discussion of the political and ethical implications of private illness and public health.

An earlier version of this chapter was presented at The Complex Systems Advanced Academic Workshop (CSAAW) at the Second Michigan Complexity Mini-Conference, University of Michigan- Center for the Study of Complex Systems (CSCS), on May 13, 2013.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler M (2005) Cognitivism, controversy and moral heuristics (open peer commentary to Sunstein). Behav Brain Sci 28:524–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt H. (1958) The human condition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1991). On rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse. Translated by Kennedy G. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, WEB (1965) The souls of black folk. In: Franklin JH (ed) Three negro classics. Avon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin G (1972) Paternalism. Monist 56(1):64–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry S, Feron E (2004). Musicality experiments in lead and follow dance. In: Systems, man and cybernetics, 2004 IEEE international conference 1:984–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2010) Moral satisficing: rethinking moral behavior as bounded rationality. Top Cogn Sci 2:528–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldspink C (2000) Modelling social systems as complex: towards a social simulation meta-model. J Artif Soc Simul 3(2). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/3/2/1.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

  • Gregson J, Foerster S, Orr R, Jones L, Benedict J, Clark B et al (2001) System, environmental, and policy changes: using the social-ecological model as a framework for evaluating nutrition education and social marketing programs with low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ 33(Suppl 1):S4–15. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60065-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griswold KS, Lesko SE, Westfall JM, Folsom Group (2013) Communities of solution: partnerships for population health. J Am Board Fam Med 26(3):232–238. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff M, Tsai W (2003) Social networks and organizations. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Garcia M, Hernandez-Lemus E (2013) Health systems as complex systems. Am J Oper Res 3:113–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (2004) Dancing with systems. Donella Meadows Institute Archives. http://www.donellameadows.org/archives/dancing-with-systems/. Accessed on 8 June 2014

  • Mill JS (1999) On liberty. Longman, Roberts and Green, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordgren L, Morris McDonnell M-H (2011) The scope-severity paradox: why doing more harm is judged to be less harmful. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2(1):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose G (1985) Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 14:32–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein C (2005) Moral heuristics. Behav Brain Sci 28:531–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef G, De Dreu D, Manstead A (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: the emotions as social information. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 42:45–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner M (2002) Publics and counterpublics. Public Cult 14(1):49–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Battle-Fisher .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Battle-Fisher, M. (2015). The Public, Private, and “Stepping on Toes” in Healthcare. In: Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Public Health(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12203-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12203-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12202-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12203-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics