Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Public Health ((BRIEFSPUHEAET))

  • 1407 Accesses

Abstract

The roles become muddled with roles that support health and others that result from nonmedical reasons. It may be a foredawn conclusion that the person’s quality of life (QOL) stays just that—inherent to a personal experience with disease. Moreover, QOL is often analogous to length of life and prognosis. What if the patient believes that life is fine as it has been dealt, imperfect clinically but personally acceptable (or tolerated)? What happens when the self-care decisions of a patient run counter to the evidence-based prescriptivism of medical care? There is a blurring of the penumbras of the public and private spheres in our understanding of QOL. The complexity of social relationships and support require policy for social integration has been shown to be linked to both physical and mental health. As the patient is embedded into a support network, I additionally posit that there is a “shared” collective QOL on the microlevel by which caring others are affected by the life state of the patient. It is an interesting question to explore the final victor in QOL: the psychometrically measured QOL, which is constructed by the “others” in the medical establishment or a patient’s subjective understandings of a sick existence. In light of generational issues of longevity with decreased physical and mental functionalities of patients, what must not be ignored is the network of support.

Earlier versions of this chapter were presented at 2011 Aging and Society: An Interdisciplinary Conference, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and the 2012 Aging and Society: An Interdisciplinary Conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi A-L (2000) Attack and error tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406:378–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen T (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1991) On rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse. Translated by Kennedy G. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JA (1974) Social networks. An Addison-Wesley module in anthropology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle-Fisher M (2013) Urban greenspce and collective health ownership. Mindful Nature 6(3):33–35. http://www.humansandnature.org/urban-greenspace-and-collective-health-ownership-article-159.php?issue=21. Accessed 14 April 2014

  • Borgatti S, Halgin D (2011) On network theory. Organ Sci 22(5):1168–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110:349–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter D, Esterling K, Lazer D (2003) The strength of strong ties—a model of contact making in policy networks with evidence from U.S. health politics. Ration Soc 15(4):411–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A-J (1988) A voice from the south. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell B, Schumm L, Laumann E, Graber J (2009) Social networks in the NSHAP Study: rationale, measurement and preliminary findings. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc 64B(Suppl 1):i47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell E, Waite L (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav 50(1):31–48

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging (n.d.) Projected future growth of the older population, population 85 and over by sex: 1900–2050. http://www.aoa.gov/Aging_Statistics/future_growth/future_growth.aspx. Accessed 12 June 2014

  • Everett M, Borgatti S (1998) Analyzing clique overlap. Connections 21(1):49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld S (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Am J Sociol 86(5):105–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld S, Carter W (1998) Foci of activities as changing contexts for friendship. In: Adams R, Allan G (eds) Placing friendship in context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Buldyrev S, Stanley H, Havlin S (2012) Networks formed from interdependent networks. Nat Phys. doi:10.1038/NPHYS2180

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Psychol 78(9):1360–1380

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregson J, Foerster S, Orr R, Jones L, Benedict J, Clark B, … Zotz K (2001) System, environmental, and policy changes: using the social-ecological model as a framework for evaluating nutrition education and social marketing programs with low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ 33(Suppl 1):4–15. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60065-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halley J, Winkler D (2008) Classification of emergence and its relationship to self-organization. Complexity 13:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin Sci Q 36:82–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D (1988) Social relationships and health. Science 241:540–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jack S (2005) The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: a qualitative study. J Manag Stud 42(6):1233–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossinets G, Watts D (2009) Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. Am J Sociol 115(2):405–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long J, Cunningham F, Braithwaite J (2013) Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 13:158

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Louch H (2000) Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Soc Netw 22:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn J (2014) Strategies to ease the burden of family caregivers. JAMA 311(10):1021–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1999) Leverage points: places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute, Hartland

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green, River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische A (2011) Relational sociology, culture and agency. In: Scott J, Carrington P (eds) The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman N (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45:167–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palla G, Derenyi I, Frakas I, Vicsek T (2005) Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature03607

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A (1953) A marginalized network highlights both the mathematical finiteness as well as socio-political constriction on life chances. Bull Math Biophys 15:523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal M (2014) Caregiver-centered care. JAMA 311(10):1015–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (2002) All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst Dyn Rev 18:501–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura MK, Tan J, O’Hare A (2012) Optimizing renal replacement therapy in older adults—a framework for making individualized decisions. Kidney Int 82(2):261–269

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United States Renal Data System (2013) USRDS 2013 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedres B, Stark D (2010) Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. Am J Sociol 1115(4):1150–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1962) General system theory—a critical review. Gen Syst 7:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory—foundations, development, applications. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White D, Houseman M (2002) Navigability of strong ties: small worlds, tie strength and network topology. Complexity 8(1):72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Battle-Fisher .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Battle-Fisher, M. (2015). The Concentric Model of Health-Bound Networks. In: Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Public Health(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12203-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12203-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12202-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12203-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics