Abstract
The roles become muddled with roles that support health and others that result from nonmedical reasons. It may be a foredawn conclusion that the person’s quality of life (QOL) stays just that—inherent to a personal experience with disease. Moreover, QOL is often analogous to length of life and prognosis. What if the patient believes that life is fine as it has been dealt, imperfect clinically but personally acceptable (or tolerated)? What happens when the self-care decisions of a patient run counter to the evidence-based prescriptivism of medical care? There is a blurring of the penumbras of the public and private spheres in our understanding of QOL. The complexity of social relationships and support require policy for social integration has been shown to be linked to both physical and mental health. As the patient is embedded into a support network, I additionally posit that there is a “shared” collective QOL on the microlevel by which caring others are affected by the life state of the patient. It is an interesting question to explore the final victor in QOL: the psychometrically measured QOL, which is constructed by the “others” in the medical establishment or a patient’s subjective understandings of a sick existence. In light of generational issues of longevity with decreased physical and mental functionalities of patients, what must not be ignored is the network of support.
Earlier versions of this chapter were presented at 2011 Aging and Society: An Interdisciplinary Conference, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and the 2012 Aging and Society: An Interdisciplinary Conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi A-L (2000) Attack and error tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406:378–382
Allen T (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Aristotle (1991) On rhetoric. A theory of civic discourse. Translated by Kennedy G. Oxford University Press, New York
Barnes JA (1974) Social networks. An Addison-Wesley module in anthropology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 1–29
Battle-Fisher M (2013) Urban greenspce and collective health ownership. Mindful Nature 6(3):33–35. http://www.humansandnature.org/urban-greenspace-and-collective-health-ownership-article-159.php?issue=21. Accessed 14 April 2014
Borgatti S, Halgin D (2011) On network theory. Organ Sci 22(5):1168–1181
Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Boston
Burt R (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110:349–399
Carpenter D, Esterling K, Lazer D (2003) The strength of strong ties—a model of contact making in policy networks with evidence from U.S. health politics. Ration Soc 15(4):411–440
Cooper A-J (1988) A voice from the south. Oxford University Press, New York
Cornwell B, Schumm L, Laumann E, Graber J (2009) Social networks in the NSHAP Study: rationale, measurement and preliminary findings. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc 64B(Suppl 1):i47–55
Cornwell E, Waite L (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav 50(1):31–48
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging (n.d.) Projected future growth of the older population, population 85 and over by sex: 1900–2050. http://www.aoa.gov/Aging_Statistics/future_growth/future_growth.aspx. Accessed 12 June 2014
Everett M, Borgatti S (1998) Analyzing clique overlap. Connections 21(1):49–61
Feld S (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Am J Sociol 86(5):105–1035
Feld S, Carter W (1998) Foci of activities as changing contexts for friendship. In: Adams R, Allan G (eds) Placing friendship in context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gao J, Buldyrev S, Stanley H, Havlin S (2012) Networks formed from interdependent networks. Nat Phys. doi:10.1038/NPHYS2180
Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Psychol 78(9):1360–1380
Gregson J, Foerster S, Orr R, Jones L, Benedict J, Clark B, … Zotz K (2001) System, environmental, and policy changes: using the social-ecological model as a framework for evaluating nutrition education and social marketing programs with low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ 33(Suppl 1):4–15. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60065-1
Halley J, Winkler D (2008) Classification of emergence and its relationship to self-organization. Complexity 13:10–15
Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin Sci Q 36:82–111
House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D (1988) Social relationships and health. Science 241:540–545
Jack S (2005) The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: a qualitative study. J Manag Stud 42(6):1233–1256
Kossinets G, Watts D (2009) Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. Am J Sociol 115(2):405–450
Long J, Cunningham F, Braithwaite J (2013) Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 13:158
Louch H (2000) Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Soc Netw 22:45–64
Lynn J (2014) Strategies to ease the burden of family caregivers. JAMA 311(10):1021–1022
Meadows D (1999) Leverage points: places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute, Hartland
Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green, River Junction
Mische A (2011) Relational sociology, culture and agency. In: Scott J, Carrington P (eds) The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage, London
Newman N (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45:167–256.
Palla G, Derenyi I, Frakas I, Vicsek T (2005) Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature03607
Rapoport A (1953) A marginalized network highlights both the mathematical finiteness as well as socio-political constriction on life chances. Bull Math Biophys 15:523–533
Rosenthal M (2014) Caregiver-centered care. JAMA 311(10):1015–1016
Sterman J (2002) All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst Dyn Rev 18:501–531
Tamura MK, Tan J, O’Hare A (2012) Optimizing renal replacement therapy in older adults—a framework for making individualized decisions. Kidney Int 82(2):261–269
United States Renal Data System (2013) USRDS 2013 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda
Vedres B, Stark D (2010) Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. Am J Sociol 1115(4):1150–1190
von Bertalanffy L (1962) General system theory—a critical review. Gen Syst 7:1–20
von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory—foundations, development, applications. Braziller, New York
White D, Houseman M (2002) Navigability of strong ties: small worlds, tie strength and network topology. Complexity 8(1):72–81
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Battle-Fisher, M. (2015). The Concentric Model of Health-Bound Networks. In: Application of Systems Thinking to Health Policy & Public Health Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Public Health(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12203-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12203-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12202-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12203-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)