Advertisement

Chicken Breeding: The Complex Transition from Traditional to Genetic Methods in the USA

  • Margaret E. DerryEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Archimedes book series (ARIM, volume 40)

Abstract

This chapter considers the complex relationship between new scientific theory and breeding practices, from the late nineteenth century to the 1950s, with a focus on poultry breeding. Poultry breeders had developed sophisticated breeding methods by 1900, when Mendel’s work was rediscovered and began to be applied to agricultural production. The case of Raymond Pearl at the Maine agricultural station illustrates how attempts to impose the new science failed to persuade poultry breeders to change their practices. The work of L. C. Dunn illustrates how genetics moved away from practical concerns and into engagement with general problems of evolutionary biology in the 1920s. I then consider the role of government in encouraging breeding, building on the ambiguous legacy of the American Poultry Association. Changes within the egg-laying industry divided breeders from producers/growers, leaving the industry ripe for change by 1930. Innovations in maize genetics and population genetics provided crucial scientific advances that revolutionized poultry breeding in the 1940s. Corporate investment was critically important to this revolution. The relationship of science to breeding has to be understood in the context of changes not only within science but also in the industry itself over a half century.

Keywords

Chicken breeding Leslie C. Dunn Egg-laying industry Maize genetics Mendelism Population genetics Poultry breeding Raymond Pearl Henry A. Wallace 

References

  1. Babcock, Ernest Brown, and R. E. Clausen. 1918. Genetics in relation to agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Bonneuil, Christophe. 2006. Mendelism, plant breeding and experimental cultures: Agriculture and the development of genetics in France. Journal of the History of Biology 39:281–308.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, William. 2001. Making meat: Science, technology, and American poultry production. Technology and Culture 42:631–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bugos, Glenn E. 1992. Intellectual property protection in the American chicken-breeding industry. Business History Review 66:127–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castonguay, Stéphane. 2005. The transformation of agricultural research in France: The introduction of the American system. Minerva 43:265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooke, Kathy J. 1997. From science to practice, or practice to science? Chickens and eggs in Raymond Pearl’s agricultural breeding research, 1907–1916. Isis 88:62–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crow, James F. 1990. Sewall Wright’s place in twentieth-century biology. Journal of the History of Biology 23:57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derry, Margaret. 2001. Ontario’s cattle kingdom: Purebred breeders and their world, 1870–1920. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Derry, Margaret E. 2003. Bred for perfection: Shorthorn cattle, collies, and Arabian horses since 1800. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Derry, Margaret E. 2012. Art and science in breeding: Crating better chickens. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyer, Peter. 1985. A gardener touched with genius: The life of Luther Burbank. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dunn, L. C. 1965. A short history of genetics: The development of some of the main lines of thought, 1864–1939. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Felch, I. K. 1877. The breeding and management of poultry. Hyde Park: Norfolk County.Google Scholar
  14. Felch, I. K. 1902. Poultry culture: How to raise, mate and judge thoroughbred fowl. Chicago: Donohue, Henneberry.Google Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, Deborah. 1990. The business of breeding: Hybrid corn in Illinois, 1890–1940. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald, Deborah. 1993. Farmers deskilled: Hybrid corn and farmers’ work. Technology and Culture 34:324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzgerald, Deborah. 2003. Every farm a factory: The industrial ideal in American agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grasseni, C. 2007. Managing cows: An ethnography of breeding practices and uses of reproductive technology in contemporary dairy farming in Lombardy (Italy). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38:488–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagedoorn, A. L., and Geoffrey Sykes. 1953. Poultry breeding: Theory and practice. London: Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
  20. Hanke, Oscar A., John L. Skinner, and James L. Florea, eds. 1974. American poultry history, 1823–1973. Madison: American Poultry History Society.Google Scholar
  21. Harwood, Jonathan. 1992. Styles of scientific thought: The German genetics community, 1900–1933. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Harwood, Jonathan. 2005a. On the genesis of technoscience: A case study of German agricultural education. Perspectives on Science 13:329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harwood, Jonathan. 2005b. Technology’s dilemma: Agricultural colleges between science and practice in Germany, 1860–1934. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Havenstein, Gerald B. 2006. Performance changes in livestock following 50 years of genetic selection. Lohmann Information 41:30–37.Google Scholar
  25. Hawthorne, H. W. 1918. A five-year farm management survey in Palmer Township, Washington County, Ohio, 1912–1916. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 716, Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  26. Heape, Walter. 1906. The breeding industry: Its value to the country, and its needs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horowitz, Roger. 2004. Making the chicken of tomorrow: Reworking poultry as commodities and as creatures, 1945–1990. In Industrializing organisms, ed. Susan R. Schrepfer and Philip Scranton, 215–237. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, Donald F. 1917. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2:466–479.Google Scholar
  29. Kimmelman, Barbara A. 1983. The American Breeders’ Association: Genetics and eugenics in an agricultural context, 1903–1913. Social Studies of Science 13:163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimmelman, Barbara A. 2006. Mr. Blakeslee builds his dream house: Agricultural institutions, genetics, and careers 1900–1915. Journal of the History of Biology 39:240–280.Google Scholar
  31. Kloppenburg, Jack Ralph, Jr. 1988. First the seed: The political economy of plant technology, 1492–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lerner, I. Michael. 1974. L.C. Dunn (1893–1974) and poultry genetics: A brief memoir. Journal of Heredity 65:185–186.Google Scholar
  33. Lytton, Hon. Mrs. Neville (Judith Anne Dorothea Wentworth Blunt-Lytton, Baroness Wentworth). 1911. Toy dogs and their ancestors. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  34. McClary, C. F. 1969. Reciprocal recurrent selection response in poultry, other animals and plants. In Proceedings, Eighteenth Annual Poultry Breeders’ Roundtable, 120–149.Google Scholar
  35. Olby, Robert. 1985. Origins of Mendelism. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Orel, Vítezslav. 1977. Selection practice and theory of heredity in Moravia before Mendel. Folia Mendeliana 12:179–199.Google Scholar
  37. Palladino, Paolo. 1993. Between craft and science: Plant breeding, Mendelian genetics, and British Universities, 1900–1920. Technology and Culture 34:300–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paul, Diane B., and Barbara A. Kimmelman. 1988. Mendel in America: Theory and practice, 1900–1919. In The American development of biology, ed. Ronald Rainger, Keith R. Benson, and Jane Maienschein, 281–310. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pawson, H. Cecil. 1957. Robert Bakewell: Pioneer livestock breeder. London: Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
  40. Prentice, E. Parmalee. 1951. Food for America, 1980-The supply of animal proteins: The agricultural colleges. Political Science Quarterly 66:481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Provine, William B. 1971. The origins of theoretical population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Provine, William B. 1986. Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ritvo, Harriet. 1986. Pride and pedigree: The evolution of the Victorian dog fancy. Victorian Studies 29:227–253.Google Scholar
  44. Ritvo, Harriet. 1987. The animal estate: The English and other creatures in the Victorian age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Russell, Nicholas. 1986. Like engend’ring like: Heredity and animal breeding in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Savage, E. S. 1942. Review of E. Parmalee Prentice, American dairy cattle: Their past and future. Journal of Economic History 2:227–229.Google Scholar
  48. Sawyer, Gordon. 1971. The agribusiness poultry industry: A history of its development. New York: Exposition.Google Scholar
  49. Schapsmeier, Edward L., and Frederick H. Schapsmeier. 1968. Henry A. Wallace of Iowa: The agrarian years, 1910–1940. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Shrader, H. L. 1952. The chicken-of-tomorrow program: Its influence on ‘meat-type’ poultry production. Poultry Science 31:3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shull, George Harrison. 1948. What is ‘heterosis’? Genetics 33:439–446.Google Scholar
  52. Termohlen, W. D. 1968. Past history and future developments. Poultry Science 47:6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Theunissen, Bert. 2008. Breeding without Mendelism: Theory and practice of dairy cattle breeding in the Netherlands, 1900–1950. Journal of the History of Biology 41:637–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Theunissen, Bert. 2012a. Darwin and his pigeons: The analogy between artificial and natural selection revisited. Journal of the History of Biology 45:179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Theunissen, Bert. 2012b. Breeding for nobility or production? Cultures of dairy cattle breeding in the Netherlands, 1945–1995. Isis 103:278–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Riper, Walter. 1932. Aesthetic notions in animal breeding. Quarterly Review of Biology 7:84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Warren, Don C. 1958. A half century of advances in the genetics and breeding improvement of poultry. Poultry Science 37:3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White, Kay. 1992. Victorian and Edwardian dogs. Veterinary History n.s. 7:72–78.Google Scholar
  59. Wieland, Thomas. 2006. Scientific theory and agricultural practice: Plant breeding in Germany from the late 19th to the early 20th century. Journal of the History of Biology 39:309–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilmot, Sarah. 2007a. Between the farm and the clinic: Agricultural and reproductive technology in the twentieth century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38:303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilmot, Sarah. 2007b. From ‘public service’ to artificial insemination: Animal breeding science and reproductive research in early twentieth-century Britain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38:411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood, Roger J., and Vítězslav Orel. 1981. Early development in artificial selection as a background to Mendel’s research. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 3:145–170.Google Scholar
  63. Wood, Roger J., and Vítězslav Orel. 2000. Scientific animal breeding in Moravia before and after the discovery of Mendel’s theory. Quarterly Review of Biology 75:149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wood, Roger J., and Vítězslav Orel. 2001. Genetic prehistory in selective breeding: A prelude to Mendel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wood, Roger J., and Vítězslav Orel. 2005. Scientific breeding in central Europe during the early nineteenth century: Background to Mendel's later work. Journal of the History of Biology 38:239–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wriedt, Christian. 1930. Heredity in livestock. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Wright, Sewall. 1921a. Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research 20:557–585.Google Scholar
  68. Wright, Sewall. 1921b. Systems of mating. Genetics 6:111–178.Google Scholar
  69. Wright, Sewall. 1922. The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding on guinea pigs. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 1090. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  70. Wright, Sewall. 1923a. Mendelian analysis of the pure bred breeds of livestock, part 1: The measurement of inbreeding and relationship. Journal of Heredity 14:339–348.Google Scholar
  71. Wright, Sewall. 1923b. Mendelian analysis of the pure bred breeds of livestock, Part 2: The Duchess family of shorthorns as bred by Thomas Bates. Journal of Heredity 14:405–422.Google Scholar
  72. Wright, Sewall. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159.Google Scholar
  73. Wright, Sewall. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 5:161–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wright, Sewall. 1958. Systems of mating and other papers. Ames: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.CaledonCanada

Personalised recommendations