Advertisement

Opportunities Through Positive Impact Investing and Finance Embedded in Banking Value Chains

  • Karen WendtEmail author
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

As a result of external pressures and internal adjustments, Banks have started to consider sustainability in their value chains. What started with a focus on internal processes, use of materials and energy consumption, has now developed into a sophisticated system which considers Environmental, Social and Governmental (ESG) criteria. Structures like the Equator Principles and Sector Policies helped banks to place an even higher emphasis on sustainability. After all, they can influence issues like climate change, poverty and labour rights significantly by evaluating their borrowers’ sustainability practices. The current sustainability efforts of banks are only sufficient, if they do embed sustainability in the core business. While voluntary standards helped to raise the bar real juice is on the opportunity. The real opportunity is to apply sustainability through positive impact financing. Banks are uniquely positioned to move from financing the economy to financing positive impacts and shared value creation.

Keywords

Supply Chain Financial Institution Social Responsible Investment Initial Public Offering International Energy Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Carbon Tracker. (2012). Unburnable carbon – Are the world’s financial markets carrying a carbon bubble? http://www.carbontracker.org/site/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/07/Unburnable-Carbon-Full-rev2.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2014.
  2. Carbon Tracker. (2013). Unburnable carbon 2013: Wasted capital and stranded assets. http://www.carbontracker.org/site/wastedcapital. Accessed 22 May 2014.
  3. Cochard, E. (2015). Translating standards into successful implementation: Sector policies and equator principles. In K. Wendt (Ed.), Responsible Investment banking. Springer International.Google Scholar
  4. Cousins, D. (2015). Implementing environmental and social risk management on the ground: Interfaces between clients, investment banks, multi-laterals, consultants and contractors: A case study from the EBRD. In K. Wendt (Ed.), Responsible Investment banking. Springer International.Google Scholar
  5. Equator Principles. (2013). The equator principles. http://www.equator-principles.com/resources/equator_principles_III.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2014.
  6. Forrester, J. W. (1977). Industrial dynamics (9th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  7. Jeschke, B. (2015). Managing assets in a complex environment: An innovative approach to sustainable decision-making. In K. Wendt (Ed.), Responsible investment banking. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. NPC Norway. (2013). Norwegian bank investment management violates OECD guidelines. http://www.responsiblebusiness.no/en/2013/05/27/norwegian-bank-investment-management-violates-oecd-guidelines/. Accessed 22 May 2014.
  9. Kleiterp, N. (2015). The new development cooperation: The importance of the private sector. In K. Wendt (Ed.), Responsible investment banking. Springer International.Google Scholar
  10. Sargut, G., & McGarth, R. G. (2011). Learning to live with complexity. Harvard Business Review, 9, 1–10.Google Scholar
  11. Venugopal, S. (2015). Mobilising private sector climate investment: Public-private financial innovations. In K. Wendt (Ed.), Responsible investment banking. Springer International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Responsible Investment BankingGröbenzellGermany

Personalised recommendations