Advertisement

German Council for Sustainable Development: The Sustainability Code

  • Yvonne ZwickEmail author
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Sustainability is becoming a decision making criterion for an increasing number of people. Nevertheless, there is no definition which is generally applicable. In fact, Corporate Social Responsibility is a concept, which makes comparison across different legal spheres difficult. This is because it is a concept, which by definition exceeds jurisdiction. This leads to arbitrary and diffuse definitions, competing benchmarks as well as additional expenses and efforts for reporters. To turn sustainability into a distinguishing feature, which is based on a resilient, comparable set of data, standardisation needs to take place. The German Council for Sustainable Development subsequently developed the German Sustainability Code and recommends its use for corporations. This article describes the approach the Sustainability Code offers for the implementation of sustainable value creation.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Sustainable Development Global Reporting Initiative Corporate Sustainability Great Transparency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Bassen, A., Meyer, K., & Schlange, J. (2006). The influence of corporate responsibility on the cost of capital: An empirical analysis. Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=984406
  2. Bassen, A., Rentrop, A., & Zwick, Y. (2011). Deutscher Nachhaltigkeitskodex (DNK) – Konzept, Inhalte und Entwicklungsschritte. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht, 3, 359–375.Google Scholar
  3. Bassen, A. (2013). Analyse der Umsetzung und Wirksamkeit des DNK – Ein Review im Auftrag des Rates für Nachhaltige Entwicklung. http://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/projekte/eigene-projekte/deutscher-nachhaltigkeitskodex/dokumente/dnk-review-summary-06-02-2013/?blstr=0. Accessed 28 February 2013.
  4. Behnam, M., & MacLean, T. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BMAS–Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. (2010). Nationale Strategie zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen (Corporate Social Responsibility – CSR) Aktionsplan CSR der Bundesregierung. Google Scholar
  6. Chatterji, A., & Levine, D. (2006). Breaking down the wall of codes. California Management Review, 48, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. A European perspective managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Ter Horst, J. (2010). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking in social investors. Working paper. http://www.corporate-engagement.com/index.php?pageID=1881&n=327&itemID=499445
  9. DNK. (2013). “Deutscher Nachhaltigkeitskodex (DNK) von 51 Unternehmen unterzeichnet,” in Deutscher Nachhaltigkeitskodex. http://www.deutscher-nachhaltigkeitskodex.de/de/hintergruende/aktuelles/nachricht/artikel/deutscher-nachhaltigkeitskodex-dnk-von-51-unternemenunterzeichnet.html. Accessed 11 June 2013.
  10. Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen. (2012). Marktbericht Nachhaltige Geldanlagen. Deutschland, Österreich und die Schweiz. http://www.forum-ng.org/images/stories/Publikationen/fng_marktbericht_2012_72dpi.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2013.
  11. Gilbert, D., & Rasche, A. (2008). Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives – A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 755–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung und future e. V. (Hrsg.). (2012). Das IÖW/future-Ranking der Nachhaltigkeitsberichte 2011: Ergebnisse und Trends. Berlin, Münster. http://www.ranking-nachhaltigkeitsberichte.de/data/ranking/user_upload/pdf/IOEW-future-Ranking_2011_Grossunternehmen_Ergebnisbericht.pdf. Accessed 19 February 2013.
  13. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, A., & Toffel, M. W. (2007). Self-regulatory institutions for solving environmental problems: Perspectives and contributions from the management literature. http://ssrn.com/abstract=985619
  15. Leipziger, D. (2010). The corporate responsibility code book. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  16. Manescu, C. (2010). Stock returns in relation to environmental, social, and governance performance: Mispricing or compensation for risk? http://hdl.handle.net/2077/20998
  17. Pies, I., von Winnig, A., Sardison, M., & Girlich, K. (2009). Nachhaltigkeit in der Mineralülindustrie: Theorie und Praxis freiwilliger Selbstverpflichtungen. Wirtschaftsethik-Studie Nr. 2009–1, des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. http://wcms.uzi.uni-halle.de/download.php?down=13079&elem=2235793. Accessed 31 May 2011.
  18. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung. (2011). Gold-Standard Ökolandbau: Für eine nachhaltige Gestaltung der Energiewende. Berlin. http://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/dokumente/empfehlungen/texte-nr-40-jul-2011/. Accessed 19 February 2013.
  19. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung. (2014). Der Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitskodex (DNK). Berlin. www.sustainabilitycode.eu. Accessed 21 November 2014.
  20. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future (Brundtland Report). Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Werner, T. (2009). Ökologische Investments: Chancen und Risiken grüner Geldanlagen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office c/o GIZ, German Council for Sustainable Development (RNE)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations