Abstract
This chapter contributes with theoretical and practical insights on maintenance decision making during acquisition of capital assets. We give theoretical insights about maintenance decision making by reviewing the literature, while our practical insights come from examples of the decisions made at a maintenance organization for rolling stock: NedTrain. We find that strategic maintenance decisions are more relevant before contracting than tactical or operational decisions, and they have the largest potential to impact Life Cycle Costs. The research on strategic maintenance decisions is too broad to review individual decisions, and therefore we review papers that structure decisions in the form of frameworks. We find that according to the literature, assets and their maintenance services should be developed concurrently. However, we find in practice that NedTrain’s approach is to fit new assets into the existing maintenance services, while there are parallel continuous improvement processes for those services. From practice, we conclude that strategic maintenance decisions are not concurrent to rolling stock design decisions. We also conclude that there is a need for methods and tools to support strategic maintenance decision making during early stages of acquisition, especially before contracting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Turki U (2011) A framework for strategic planning in maintenance. J Qual Maintenance Eng 17(2):150–162. doi:10.1108/13552511111134583
Atkins (2011) Rail value for money study: asset management and supply chain management assessment of GB rail, issue 1.1 edn. Atkins, London
Ben-Daya M, Duffuaa SO, Raouf A, Knezevic J, Ait-Kadi D (2009) Handbook of maintenance management and engineering. Springer, Berlin
Blanchard BS (2004) Logistics engineering and management., Prentice-Hall international series in industrial and systems engineeringPearson Prentice Hall, NJ
Cavalieri S, Garetti M, Macchi M, Pinto R (2008) A decision-making framework for managing maintenance spare parts. Prod Plann Control 19(4):379–396. doi:10.1080/09537280802034471
Crespo Márquez A, Gupta JND (2006) Contemporary maintenance management: process, framework and supporting pillars. Omega 34(3):313–326. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.003
Crespo Márquez A, Moreu De León P, Gómez Fernández J, Parra Márquez C, López Campos MA (2009) The maintenance management framework: a practical view to maintenance management. J Qual Maintenance Eng 15(2):167–178. doi:10.1108/13552510910961110
Dawotola AW, Trafalis TB, Mustaffa Z, van Gelder PHAJM, Vrijling JK (2013) Risk-based maintenance of a cross-country petroleum pipeline system. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 4(3):141–148. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000121
Driessen M, Arts J, van Houtum GJ, Rustenburg JW, Huisman B (2014) Maintenance spare parts planning and control: a framework for control and agenda for future research. Prod Plann Control, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09537287.2014.907586
Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F, Zanin G (2014) Industrial maintenance policy development: a quantitative framework. Int J Prod Econ 147:85–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.018
Garg A, Deshmukh SG (2006) Maintenance management: literature review and directions. J Qual Maintenance Eng 12(3):205–238. doi:10.1108/13552510610685075
Ghosh D, Roy S (2010) A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance. Eur J Ind Eng 4(1):78. doi:10.1504/EJIE.2010.029571
Gómez Fernández JF, Crespo Márquez A (2009) Framework for implementation of maintenance management in distribution network service providers. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(10):1639–1649. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2009.04.003
Gramopadhye AK, Drury CG, Prabhu PV (1997) Training strategies for visual inspection. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 7(3):171–196. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199722)7:3<171:AID-HFM2>3.0.CO;2-0
Gunasekaran A, Ngai E, McGaughey R (2006) Information technology and systems justification: a review for research and applications. Eur J Oper Res 173(3):957–983. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.002
Hastings NAJ (2010) Logistic support. In: Physical asset management. Chap 4 Springer, London, pp 179–195. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-751-6
Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1988) Dynamic manufacturing: creating the learning organization. Free Press, NY
Horenbeek A, Pintelon L, Muchiri P (2011) Maintenance optimization models and criteria. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(3):189–200. doi:10.1007/s13198-011-0045-x
INCOSE (2010) Systems engineering handbook. A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. INCOSE, Seatle
Jardine A, Tsang A (2013) Maintenance, replacement, and reliability: theory and applications, mechanical engineering, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London
Jones JV (2006) Supportability engineering handbook: implementation, measurement, and management. SOLE Logistics Press/McGraw-Hill, New York
Kutucuoglu KY, Hamali J, Irani Z, Sharp JM (2001) A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(1/2):173–195. doi:10.1108/01443570110358521
Leenen M, Wolf A (2010) World market to reach 160 billion by 2015. Int Railway J (Sep 2010) pp 2–3
López Campos MA, Crespo Márquez A (2011) Modelling a maintenance management framework based on PAS 55 standard. Qual Reliab Eng Int 27(6):805–820. doi:10.1002/qre.1168
McKone K, Weiss E (1998) TPM: planned and autonomous maintenance: bridging the gap between practice and research. Prod Oper Manag 7(4):335–350
Melo M, Nickel S, Saldanha-da Gama F (2009) Facility location and supply chain management a review. Eur J Oper Res 196(2):401–412. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007
Muchiri P, Pintelon L, Gelders LF, Martin H (2011) Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators. Int J Prod Econ 131(1):295–302. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.039
Murthy DNP, Kobbacy KAH (eds) (2008) Complex system maintenance handbook. Springer series in reliability engineeringSpringer, London. doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-011-7
Murthy DNP, Atrens A, Eccleston JA (2002) Strategic maintenance management. J Qual Maintenance Eng 8(4):287–305. doi:10.1108/13552510210448504
Naughton MD, Tiernan P (2012) Individualising maintenance management: a proposed framework and case study. J Qual Maintenance Eng 18(3):267–281
Nicolai RP, Dekker R (2008) Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: a review. In: Murthy D, Kobbacy K (eds) Complex system maintenance handbook. Chap 11 Springer, London, pp 263–286. doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-011-7_11
Parada Puig JE, Hoekstra S, Huisman B, van Dongen LAM (2011) Supportability and purchasing decisions for capital assets: positioning paper. In: IET and IAM asset management conference 2011. IET, London, pp P07–P07. doi:10.1049/cp.2011.0566
Parida A, Kumar U (2006) Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): Issues and challenges. J Qual Maintenance Eng 12(3):239–251
Pinjala SK, Pintelon L, Vereecke A (2006) An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies. Int J Prod Econ 104(1):214–229. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.12.024
Pintelon L, Gelders LF (1992) Maintenance management decision making. Eur J Oper Res 58(3):301–317. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90062-E
Pintelon L, van Puyvelde F (2006) Maintenance decision making, 1st edn. Acco, Leuven
Prasad Mishra R, Anand G, Kodali R (2006) Development of a framework for world-class maintenance systems. J Adv Manuf Syst 5(2):141–165. doi:10.1142/S0219686706000807
Pyke DF, Cohen MA (1990) Push and pull in manufacturing and distribution systems. J Oper Manag 9(1):24–43. doi:10.1016/0272-6963(90)90144-3
Rausand M (1998) Reliability centered maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 60(2):121–132. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(98)83005-6
Rosqvist T, Laakso K, Reunanen M (2009) Value-driven maintenance planning for a production plant. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(1):97–110. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.018
Srivastava S (2008) Network design for reverse logistics. Omega 36(4):535–548. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.11.012
Takata S (2013) Maintenance-centered circular manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 11:23–31. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.066
Takata S, Kimura F, van Houten FJAM, Westkamper E, Shpitalni M, Ceglarek D, Lee J (2004) Maintenance: changing role in life cycle management. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(2):643–655. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60033-X
Tam AS, Price JW (2008) A generic asset management framework for optimising maintenance investment decision. Prod Plann Control 19(4):287–300. doi:10.1080/09537280802034042
Tam AS, Price JW, Beveridge A (2007) A maintenance optimisation framework in application to optimise power station boiler pressure parts maintenance. J Qual Maintenance Eng 13(4):364–384. doi:10.1108/13552510710829461
Tsang AH (2002) Strategic dimensions of maintenance management. J Qual Maintenance Eng 8(1):7–39. doi:10.1108/13552510210420577
Umeda Y, Takata S, Kimura F, Tomiyama T, Sutherland JW, Kara S, Herrmann C, Duflou JR (2012) Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning an environmental perspective. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):681–702. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.004
van Dongen LAM (2014) Through-life engineering services: the NedTrain case. In: Redding L, Roy R (eds) Through-life engineering services: motivation, theory and practice chap 3, Springer, Cranfield
Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2002) A framework for maintenance concept development. Int J Prod Econ 77(3):299–313. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00156-6
Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2004) Maintenance concept development: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 89(3):395–405. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.09.008
Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2009) CIBOCOF: a framework for industrial maintenance concept development. Int J Prod Econ 121(2):633–640. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.012
Yan S, Yang TH, Chen HH (2004) Airline short-term maintenance manpower supply planning. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 38(9–10):615–642. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.03.005
Acknowledgments
This research is part of the “Rolling Stock Life Cycle Logistics” applied research and development program, funded by NS/NedTrain. We thank the experts at NedTrain for their invaluable help and insights. The second and third authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Lloyd’s Register Foundation (LRF). LRF helps to protect life and property by supporting engineering-related education, public engagement and the application of research. We also extend our words of gratitude to our colleagues from the chair of Maintenance Engineering and to the reviewers for their invaluable help in improving this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parada Puig, J.E., Basten, R.J.I., van Dongen, L.A.M. (2015). Understanding Maintenance Decisions: How to Support Acquisition of Capital Assets. In: Redding, L., Roy, R. (eds) Through-life Engineering Services. Decision Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12111-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12111-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12110-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12111-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)