Skip to main content

Educating BSW and MSW Social Workers to Practice in Child Welfare Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Informed Assessment and Practice in Child Welfare

Abstract

Child welfare generally refers to a broad range of services provided by agencies charged with maintaining the safety and well-being of children according to legally mandated or socially sanctioned standards of conduct. For the purpose of this chapter, child welfare specifically denotes services provided to at-risk children and their families who have been referred to Child Protective Services (CPS) agencies because of confirmed maltreatment, neglect, or the likelihood of this occurrence.

This chapter offers a basis for deciding which professional staff positions in CPS agencies are most effectively filled by social work graduates with specific levels of education. Underlying the recommendations made herein is the conviction that masters-level graduates should have direct field experience with at-risk children and their families before performing duties in the areas of supervision, evaluation, or administration. Conversely, the authors recognize that some valued employees may leave a child welfare agency if promotional opportunities are, in effect, limited by an absence of meaningful financial support for graduate education.

Bachelors in Social Work (BSW) and Masters in Social Work (MSW) graduates have important but different roles to play in CPS, where an expansive array of responsibilities demands many skills and functional competencies to perform critical activities. In an era of shrinking resources, it is incumbent on CPS administrators to determine how they can most effectively and efficiently serve at-risk families. The cases worked on a daily basis by screeners, preliminary investigators, and direct service workers are extremely complex. Supervisors and managers must ensure that program goals and mandates are satisfied and that workers are adequately trained for the services they are expected to deliver.

Children enter CPS because there is evidence of harm or because there is adequate reason to suspect that they are at risk for harm. As child welfare programs have become progressively more subject to public scrutiny, emphasis on the understandable need to balance educational requirements against resource availability has developed. The realities of administration and decision-making in CPS strongly suggest that differential educational levels should be reflected in the hiring criteria for functionally diverse professional positions. A key concern is how quality services can best be provided to children and their families while remaining responsive to the economic problems impinging on publicly funded child welfare systems. Standards for minimal educational criteria in CPS staff positions should be clearly indicated by the inherent demands of those positions and the knowledge and skills needed to effectively execute attendant responsibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, D. M. (2002). Human services management: Organizational leadership in social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, B. L., & McLean, A. L. (1994). A report: Child welfare curriculum in accredited BSW programs. Green Bay: U.S. Children’s Bureau, Administration on Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagdasaryan, S. (2005). Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(6), 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. P., Landsverk, J., Chamberlain, P., Reid, J. B., Rolls, J. A., Hurlburt, M. S., Farmer, E. M., James, S., McCabe, K. M., & Kohl, P. L. (2005). Parent-training programs in child welfare services: Planning for a more evidence-based approach to serving biological parents. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(5), 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, K. S. (2001). Assessing parent competence in child protection cases: A clinical practice model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., Anthony, C., Krishnakumar, A., Stone, G., Gerard, J., & Pemberton, S. (1997). Interparental conflict and youth problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 6, 233-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., Cox, M. E., & Cuddeback, G. (2003). Foster parents’ perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, S. J. (2001). Risk assessment in child welfare: The art and science. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(11), 811–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Children’s Bureau. (n.d.). Child and family services review fact sheet. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/cwmonitoring/recruit/cfsrfactsheet.htm. Accessed 12 July 2011.

  • Connell, C. M., Bergeron, N., Katz, K. H., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K. (2007). Re-referral to child protective services: The influence of child, family, and case characteristics on risk status. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(5), 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell-Carrick, K. (2000). A critical review of the empirical literature: Identifying correlates of child neglect. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 20(5), 389-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. E., & Petren, R. E. (2011). Foster parent perceptions of competency: Implications for foster parent training. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10), 1968–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (1982). Curriculum policy for the master’s degree programs in social work education. Social Work Education Reporter, 30(3), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (1995). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures (rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Council on Social Work Education (CSWE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. E., Buehler, C., & Orme, J. G. (2002). Recruitment and foster family service. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29, 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddeback, G. S. (2004). Kinship family foster care: A methodological and substantive synthesis of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(7), 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, D., McCarragher, T., & Dellmann-Jenkins, M. (2005). Training, transfer, and turnover: Exploring the relationship among transfer of learning factors and staff retention in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(8), 931–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daledien, E., Pang, D., Roberts, D., Slavin, L., & Pestle, S. (2010). Intensive home based services within a comprehensive system of care for youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 318–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, K., & Berry, M. (2002). Engaging families in child welfare services: an evidence-based approach to best practice. Child Welfare, 81(2), 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, C., & Coady, N. (2007). Good helping relationships in child welfare: Learning from stories of success. Child and Family Social Work, 12(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D. (1992). Foster care as a two-tiered system. Children and Youth Service Review, 14, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, E., & Pollock, S. (2003). Managing sexually abused/abusing children in substitute care. Child and Family Social Work, 8(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A., & McCloskey, L. (1990). Moving child abuse and neglect prevention programs forward: Improving program evaluations. Child Abuse and Neglect, 14, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. R., Miller, V. P., & Barbee, A. P. (2003). Finding and keeping child welfare workers. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 7(1–2), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E., & Shlonsky, A. (2000). Risk assessment in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(11), 813–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geeraert, L., Van den Noortgate, W., Grietens, H., & Onghena, P. (2004). The effects of early prevention programs for families with young children at risk for physical child abuse and neglect: A meta-analysis. Child Maltreatment, 9(3), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2005). The effects of the ARC organizational intervention on caseworker turnover, climate, and culture in children welfare services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 855–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006). The effects of the ARC organizational intervention on caseworker turnover, climate, and culture in children’s service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(8), 855-880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. (2008). Evaluating the evaluators in custodial dispute placements. Forensic psychology and neuropsychology for criminal and civil cases (pp. 527–546).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. (2008). Evaluating the evaluators in custodial dispute placements. Forensic psychology and neuropsychology for criminal and civil cases (pp. 527–546).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. D. (1993). Mandatory reporting laws: Child protective case finding gone awry? Social Work, 38(1), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, A. P. (1992) Adolescents in foster care: Factors affecting the worker youth relationship. Children and Youth Services Review, 14(3–4), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsman, M. (2007). Supporting child welfare supervisors to improve worker retention. Child Welfare, 86(2), 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. N., Rosanbalm, K. D., & Dodge, K. A. (2011). Multiple response team: Evaluating of policy change in north Carolina’s child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2355–2365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leschied, A. W., Chiodo, D., Whitehead, P. C., Hurley, D., & Marshall, L. (2002). The empirical basis of risk assessment in child welfare: the accuracy of risk assessment and clinical judgment. Child Welfare, 82(5), 527–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. A., Packard, T. R., & Lewis, M. D. (2011a). Management of human service programs. CengageBrain.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. L., Kotch, J., Wiley, T. R., Litrownik, A. J., English, D. J., Thompson, R., Zolotor, A. J., Block, S. D., Dubowitz, H. (2011b). Internalizing problems: A potential pathway from childhood maltreatment to adolescent smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(3), 247-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, J., & Nelson, G. (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(9), 1127–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J., Nishimoto, R., & Subramanian, K. (1991). Assessment in family support systems: Initial reliability and validity testing of the family assessment form. Child Welfare, 70(1), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J., Pecora, P., Franke, T., Christie, C., & Lorthridge, J. (2012). Can public child welfare help to prevent child maltreatment? Promising findings from Los Angeles. Journal of Family Strengths, 12(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, T. M., & Schnieder, K. (2007). Poverty, child maltreatment, and foster care. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 13(5), 296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. (2011). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes. CengageBrain.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, R. R., Litrownik, A. J., & Landsverk, J. A. (2000). Children and youth in foster care: Disentangling the relationship between problem behaviors and number of placements. Child abuse and neglect, 24(10), 1363–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York State. (2011). 2008 & 2009 Child Protective Services Reports. Office of Children & Family Services. http://ocfs.ny.gov/main/cps/statistics.asp.

  • New York Child Protective Services. (1993). State Central Register: Reporting highlights 1974-1992. Unpublished report to New York governor and legislature, 1992. Quoted data were obtained through manipulation of statistics contained in Table 9 of the report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissly, J. A., Barak, M. E. M., & Levin, A. (2005). Stress, social support, and workers’ intentions to leave their jobs in public child welfare. Administration in Social Work, 29(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterman, M., Schuengel, C., Wim Slot, N., Bullens, R. A., & Doreleijers, T. A. (2007). Disruptions in foster care: A review and meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patti, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). The handbook of social welfare management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecora, P. J. (Ed.). (2000). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. E. (2006). Education and child welfare supervisor performance: Does a social work degree matter? Research on Social Work Practice, 16(6), 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1997). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. M., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J., Reid, J. B., Leve, L. D., & Laurent, H. (2008). Effects of a foster parent training intervention on placement changes of children in foster care. Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. M., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J., & Reid, J. (2009). KEEP foster-parent training intervention: Model description and effectiveness. Child and Family Social Work, 14(2), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittner, B. (1995). Children on the move: Placement patterns in children’s protective services. Families in Society, 76(8), 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, M. K., & Biggerstaff, M. A. (1993). Strategies for recruitment and retention of foster families. Children and Youth Services Review, 15(5), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogosch, F. A., Dackis, M. N., Cicchetti, D. (2011). Child maltreatment and allostatic load: Consequences for physical and mental health in children from low-income families. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 1107–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1991). A model of case management: Toward empirically based practice. Social Work, 36(6), 520–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J.P., Garnier, P., Zyphur, M., & Zhai, F. (2006). Investigating the effects of caseworker characteristics in child welfare. Child and Youth Services Review, 28, 993–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scannapieco, M., & Connell-Corrick, K. (2003). Do collaborations with schools of social work make a difference for the field of child welfare? Practice, retention and curriculum. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 7(1–2), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L. O. (2002). Negligence in placement and supervision of children in foster care: Are social workers liable? Children and Youth Review, 8(3), 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlak, A. J., & Broadhurst, D. D. (1996). Executive summary of the third national incidence study of child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: DHHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., McPherson, K., Greene, A., & Li, S. (2010). Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/abuse_neglect/natl_incid/reports/natl_incid/natl_incid_title.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, A., & Wagner, D. (2005). The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and youth services review, 27(4), 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. D., & Donovan, S. E. (2003). Child welfare practice in organizational and institutional context. Social Service Review, 77(4), 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, C., Herrenkohl, T. I., Moylan, C. A., Tajima, E. A., Klika, J. B., Herrenkohl, R. C., & Russo, M. J. (2011). Longitudinal study on the effects of child abuse and children’s exposure to domestic violence, parent-child attachments, and antisocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of interpersonal violence, 26(1), 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, V. C., & Dore, M. M. (2009). Job satisfaction in stable state child welfare workforce: Implications for staff retention. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(3), 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, M. F. (1992). Conditions of risk for substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, L. (1990). Foster care training: A comprehensive approach. Child Welfare, 69(2), 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, D., Lamonde, G., & Beaudoin, A. (2008). Evaluation of an in-service training for child welfare practitioners. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yampolskaya, S., Armstrong, M. I., & King-Miller, T. (2011). Contextual and individual-level predictors of abused children’s reentry into out-of-home care: A multilevel mixture survival analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 35(9), 670–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlotnik, J. L. (2003). Preparing social workers for child welfare practice: Lessons from an historical review of the literature. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 15(3–4), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Holosko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional Resources

Additional Resources

State Registry Screeners

New York State Office of Children and Family Services

http://www.ocfs.state.ny.us/main/youth_portal.asp

Intake, Investigation, and Assessment

Department of Health and Human Services

Child Welfare and Information Gateway

https://www.childwelfare.gov/responding/iia/

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services:

Practices and Procedures Guide

Department of Child Protective Services

http://www.dshs.wa.gov/ca/pubs/mnl_pnpg/chapter  2.asp

University of California at Berkeley, School of Social Welfare

Risk and Safety Assessment in Child Welfare: Instrument Comparison

http://cssr.berkeley.edu/bassc/public/risk_summ.pdf

Intensive Family Services

Institute for Family Development

http://www.institutefamily.org/programs_IFPS.asp

Case Closures

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/handbooks/cps/files/CPS_pg_1460.asp

Department of Health and Human Services

Child Welfare and Information Gateway

Child Protective Services: A Guide for Caseworkers. 2003

https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/cps/cpsk.cfm

Supervision

Direct Service Supervision

https://www.childwelfare.gov/management/administration/

Program Evaluation

Department of Health and Human Services

Child Welfare and Information Gateway

A guide to Program Evaluation

https://www.childwelfare.gov/management/effectiveness/evaluation/index.cfm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holosko, M., Faith, E. (2015). Educating BSW and MSW Social Workers to Practice in Child Welfare Services. In: Wodarski, J., Holosko, M., Feit, M. (eds) Evidence-Informed Assessment and Practice in Child Welfare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12045-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics