Skip to main content

The Kubelka–Munk Framework and Measuring Opacity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Application of Light Scattering to Coatings

Abstract

So far, we have considered the scattering phenomenon itself—Mie’s theory of individual particles scattering light and the effects that different particle attributes have on maximum scattering strength, and the theory of groups of particles scattering light and the finding that close proximity of one particle to another leads to a loss of scattering strength (dependent scattering). We have, however, neglected a crucial aspect of this phenomenon—how to actually measure light scattering in the paint films of interest to us. To do this, we will consider scattering from the entire paint film, rather than from individual particles or groups of particles. Using this framework, we can transform intensity measurements of white light reflected from a paint film drawn down on a black and white chart into scattering values (S TiO2 and S coat) of the paint. Using Kubelka–Munk equations, we can calculate from the reflectance data the area that a liter of paint will cover at complete hide as formulated, and we can directly compare the light scattering and absorption efficiencies of different paints. In addition, we can use these equations as a guide to different ways of increasing the opacity of the paint and ensuring full advantage is taken of the pigment used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This can be understood by imaging the extreme case where so much toner is added that all of the light is absorbed by the film. In this case, the paint above each section of the drawdown card will be completely black—that is, the appearance of the paint on each section of the card will be identical. This is the definition of a contrast ratio of 1.0, and so we see that contrast ratio increases as toner is added to the paint.

  2. 2.

    There is a second reason to add toner to white automotive coatings, which is to make allowance for variability in the brightness of the white pigment. A small amount of toner is added when the pigment is at the high end of the brightness range to match the paint brightness seen when a batch of TiO2 pigment at the low end of the acceptable brightness range is used.

  3. 3.

    Rheology is the viscosity profile over a range of shear rates.

  4. 4.

    The value of SX needed for a contrast ratio of 0.98 can also be read directly from Fig. 3.13.

References

  1. Kubelka, P., Munk, F.: Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche. Z. Tech. Physik. 12, 593 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Judd, D.B., et al.: Optical specification of light-scattering materials. J. Res. Natl. Bureau. Stand. 19, 287 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holtzen, D.W.: An improved drawdown blade. J. Coat. Technol. 52(662), 43 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Diebold .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diebold, M. (2014). The Kubelka–Munk Framework and Measuring Opacity. In: Application of Light Scattering to Coatings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12015-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics