Abstract
This paper briefly describes the method of a qualitative study, which used focus groups to elicit the views of older people and formal and informal carers of older people on the ethical issues surrounding the introduction of social robots into the homes of older people. We then go on to sketch some of the tensions and conflicts that can arise between formal carers, informal carers, and older people when trying to negotiate the task of dividing care responsibilities, and describe how the introduction of robots may exacerbate, or ease, these tensions. Data from the qualitative study is used to indicate where participants acknowledged, identified and discussed these issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf. Technol. 14, 27–40 (2012)
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., Evers, V.: Human-Robot User Studies in Eldercare: Lessons Learned. In: Nugent, C., Augusto, J.C. (eds.) Smart Homes and Beyond, pp. 31–38. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
Sparrow, R., Sparrow, L.: In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind. Mach. 16, 141–161 (2006)
Crisp, N.: Creating a patient-led NHS – delivering the NHS improvement plan (2005), http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/ , http://dh.gov.uk/en/publicationsandstatistics/publications/publicationspolicyandguidance/dh_4106506 (accessed May 22, 2014)
Sorell, T., Draper, H.: Robot carers, ethics and older people. Ethics Inf. Technol. (2014), doi:10.1007/s10676-014-9344-7
Palm, E.: Who Cares? Moral Obligations in Formal and Informal Care Provision in the Light of ICT-Based Home Care. Health Care Anal. 21, 171–188 (2013)
Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNg Years, http://accompanyproject.eu/ (accessed July 29, 2014)
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L.: Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In: Huberman, A.M., Miles, M.B. (eds.) The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, pp. 305–330. Sage, California (2002)
Borry, P., Schotsmans, P., Dierickx, K.: What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis. Med. Healthc. Philos. 7, 41–53 (2004)
Kon, A.A.: The role of empirical research in bioethics. Amer. J. Bioeth. 9(6-7), 59–65 (2009)
Draper, H., Sorell, T., Bedaf, S., Syrdal, D.S., Gutierrez-Ruiz, C., Duclos, A., Amirabdollahian, F.: Ethical Dimensions of Human-Robot Interactions in the Care of Older People: Insights from 21 Focus Groups Convened in the UK, France and the Netherlands. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8755, pp. 135–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jenkins, S., Draper, H. (2014). Robots and the Division of Healthcare Responsibilities in the Homes of Older People. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8755. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11972-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11973-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)