Abstract
As part of a large scale qualitative study (conducted in France, the UK and the Netherlands) of potential users’ views on the ethical values that should govern the design and programming of social robots for older people, we elicited responses to a scenario where a robot is programmed to modify an older person’s rude behavior. Participants’ responses ranged from outright disagreement with robotized efforts to change characteristic behavior, to approval as a means to an end. We discuss these views against the background of respect for autonomy, the differences and similarities between robot and human carers, and behavior modification in the context of rehabilitation, where the ‘no gain without pain’ principle is commonly used to justify what would otherwise seem callous. We conclude that such programming may be acceptable in the context of the rehabilitation and promotion of the independence of older people.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amirabdollahian, F., Bedaf, S., Bormann, R., Draper, H., Evers, V., Pérez, J.G., Dautenhahn, K.: Assistive technology design and development for acceptable robotics companions for ageing years. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 4(2), 94–112 (2013)
Marti, P.: Expression rich communication through a squeezable device, BioRob, São Paulo, Brazil, August 12-15 (2014)
Marti, P., et al.: Shaping empathy through perspective taking. In: 2013 IEEE RO-MAN: The 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Gyeongju, Korea, August 26-29 (2013)
Draper, H., Sorell, T., Bedaf, S., Syrdal, D.S., Gutierrez-Ruiz, C., Duclos, A., Amirabdollahian, F.: Ethical Dimensions of Human-Robot Interactions in the Care of Older People: Insights from Focus Groups Convened in UK, France and the Netherlands. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8755, pp. 135–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Spahn, A.: And Lead Us Not Into Persuasion..? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication. Science and Engineering Ethics 18, 633–650 (2012)
Berdichewsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Towards An Ethics of Persuasive Technology. Communications of the ACM 42(5), 51–58 (1999)
Baker, S., Martinson, D.L.: The TARES test: Five Principles for Ethical Persuasion. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16(2), 148–175 (2001)
Draper, H., Sorell, T.: Patient Responsibilities in Medical Ethics. Bioethics 16(4), 307–334 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Draper, H., Sorell, T. (2014). Using Robots to Modify Demanding or Impolite Behavior of Older People. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8755. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11972-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11973-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)