Abstract
Throughout 2010 and the first half of 2011, the University of Michigan (U-M) coordinated an Integrated Assessment (IA) to analyze the U-M’s sustainability efforts to date, benchmark against other institutions, and chart a course for the future. Informed by an extensive stakeholder engagement process, the U-M CSIA represents one of the most comprehensive campus sustainability analyses completed at a US institution of higher education. Community Awareness was one of four themes that emerged from the CSIA, along with Climate Action, Waste Prevention, and Healthy Environments. The key actions within the Community Awareness theme were designed to work synergistically in fostering awareness and responsible behavior across the U-M campus. This focus on behavior change and culture is critically important for driving progress toward the quantifiable goals established by the CSIA within the other three themes. Key investment areas within the Community Awareness theme are awareness and education programs, reporting and communication, and longitudinal surveys designed to measure and track the culture of sustainability. This chapter provides an overview of the CSIA process and outcomes, with a focus on cultural change and the groundbreaking effort to develop and administer a comprehensive longitudinal study. This study—the Sustainability Cultural Indicators Program (SCIP)—used focus groups and then a comprehensive survey to measure and track sustainability knowledge, behavior, and attitudes. Starting in October 2012, more than 4,000 students and 2,000 faculty and staff members responded to the survey which included questions on transportation, waste prevention and conservation, the natural environment, climate change, and various campus sustainability initiatives. Using data collected in fall 2012, selected findings from the initial data collection are presented. Finally, plans for ongoing analyses, the use of the results by the University, possible coordination with other institutions, and subsequent data collections are outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Council is comprised the University President, the Provost and Executive Vice President for Student Affairs, the Vice Presidents for Research, Student Affairs, Development, and Global Communications and Strategic Initiatives, the Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs, and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
- 2.
More information on the CSIA process, outcomes, and evaluation can be found at http://graham.umich.edu/ia/campus.php.
- 3.
Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Yale University environment.yale.edu/climate.
References
Hollweg KS, Taylor JR, Bybee RW, Marcinkowski TJ, McBeth WC, Zoido P (2011) Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. Retrieved from the North American Association for Environmental Education. http://www.naaee.net
Lund K, Dinse K, Callewaert J, Scavia D (2011). Benefits of using integrated assessment to address sustainability challenges. J Environ Stud Sci 1(4):289–295
Marans RW, Levy B, Bridges B, Keeler K, Avrahami T, Bennett J, Davidson K, Goodman L, Holdstein B, Smith R (2010) Campus sustainability integrated assessment: culture team phase 1 report. Retrieved from http://www.graham.umich.edu/pdf/culture-phase1.pdf
Maus J (2011) Census: Portland and Oregon lead nation in biking to work. Retrieved from http://bikeportland.org/2011/09/28/census-portland-and-oregon-lead-nation-in-biking-to-work-59754
McKenzie B, Rapino M (2011) Commuting in the United States: 2009. Retrieved from the American Community Survey Reports, ACS-15. http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acs-15.pdf
Scott G (2004) Change matters: making a difference in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/6892/AUQF_04_Paper_Scott.pdf
Senge P (2000) The fifth discipline: the art and science of the learning organization. Crown Business, New York, NY
Sharp L (2002) Green campuses: the road from little victories to systemic transformation. Int J Sustain High Educ 3(2):128–145
Sharp L (2009) Higher education: the quest for a sustainable campus. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 5(1):1–8
Vaccaro L, Read J, Diana J, Scavia D, Horning A (2009) Tackling wicked problems through integrated assessment. Retrieved from http://graham.umich.edu/knowledge/pubs
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to the other members of the SCIP team who helped design, test, and implement the questionnaire; Anya Dale, Beatrice Holdstein, Andrew Horning, Ken Keeler, Ethan Schoolman, Cheryl Wiese, and the dozens of U-M students, faculty, and staff who participated in focus groups and pre-test sessions, or provided valuable recommendations. We would also like to extend our appreciation to Debra Rowe, Cynthia Thomashow, and Harold Glasser, who provided input on SCIP plans and the questionnaires.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Callewaert, J., Marans, R.W., Shriberg, M. (2015). Advancing a Culture of Sustainability at the University of Michigan. In: Leal Filho, W., Muthu, N., Edwin, G., Sima, M. (eds) Implementing Campus Greening Initiatives. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11961-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11961-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11960-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11961-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)