Abstract
Family farming is one of the primary generators of work, employment and income in rural areas of Brazil. Based on this knowledge, the federal government has adopted incentives for producers in an attempt to make this productive sector more competitive and efficient. However, much remains to be done to make the development truly sustainable. By evaluating this dynamic, this paper proposes a model based on multimethodologies to assist the actors in defining and applying public policies. To facilitate and provide a greater understanding of the problem, the Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA) method was applied through cognitive maps in conjunction with the Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) approach, which allowed a higher level of analysis of the alternatives. With the alternatives available, the multicriteria method PROMETHEE II was applied to ranking the alternatives to be implemented. The proposed model provides the people involved with a greater level of insight into the problem to be analysed and facilitates the adoption of public policies that meet the needs and preferences of farmers.
Lúcio dos Santos e Silva—Deceased.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackermann F, Eden C (2010) Strategic options development and analysis. In: Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. Springer, Berlin, pp 135–190
Albadvi A, Chaharsooghi SK, Esfahanipour A (2007) Decision making in stock trading: an application of PROMETHEE. Eur J Oper Res 177:673–683
Banxia Software (1996) Decision explorer, version 3.0.4 analyst user guide. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Balezentis T (2011) A farming efficiency estimation model based on fuzzy multimoora. Manage Theory Stud Rural Bus Infrastructure Dev 5:29
Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
Borec A, Bohak Z, Turk J, Prisenk J (2013) The succession status of family farms in the mediterranean region of Slovenia. Sociológia 45(3)
Brans JP, Mareschal B (2002) Promethee—Gaia: une méthodologia d’aide à La décision em présence de critères multiples. Éditions de L’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles
Chen Y, Kilgour D, Hipel K (2012) A decision rule aggregation approach to multiple criteria-multiple participant sorting. Group Decis Negot 21(5):727–745
Dogliotti S, García MC, Peluffo S, Dieste JP, Pedemonte AJ, Bacigalupe GF, Scarlato M, Alliaume F, Alvarez J, Chiappe M, Rossing WAH (2014) Co-innovation of family farm systems: a systems approach to sustainable agriculture. Agric Syst 126:76–86
Eden C, Ackermann F (2006) Where next for problem structuring methods. J Oper Res Society 57(7):766–768
Eid F, de Oliveira Eid RMC (2003) Marketing and family farming: a cooperative study of Agrarian reform. In: Proceedings of XXIII national meeting of production engineering—Ouro Preto, 21–24 Oct 2003
Georgiou I (2011) Cognitive mapping and strategic options development and analysis (SODA). Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, New Jersey
Gomes EG, Soares de Mello JCCB, Mangabeira JFC (2007) Aggregation of partial ordinal productivity: a case study in family farming. Investigação Operacional 27:199–213
Gomes EG, Soares de Mello JCCB, Souza GS, Angulo Meza L, Mangabeira JAC (2009) Efficiency and sustainability assessment for a group of farmers in the Brazilian Amazon. Ann Oper Res 169:167–181
Groot JCJ, Oomen GJM, Rossing WAH (2012) Multi-objective optimization and design of farming systems. Agric Syst 110:63–77
Guanziroli C, Romeiro A, Buainain AM, di Sabbato A, Bittencourt G (2001) Family farming and agrarian reform in century XXI. Garamond, Rio de Janeiro
Junker F, Schutz K (2011) When poverty reduction and market access go hand in hand. How Brazilian agricultural policy is promoting family farms. Available at http://www.rural21.com/uploads/media/rural_2011_4_36-39_01.pdf
Kester LV, dos Santos EM, Sartin KR (2012) Role of supporting social economy institutions with family farms: case of the agroecological farmers in Cacoal-RO. In: Proceedings of XXXII national meeting of production engineering, Bento Gonçalves, 15–18 Oct 2012
Macharis J, Brans P, Mareschal B (1998) The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure. J Decis Syst 7:283–307
Macharis C, Springael J, de Brucker K, Verbeke A (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 153:307–317
MDA—Ministry of Agrarian Development. Available at http://www.mda.gov.br/portal/
Pernambuco Sustainable Rural Project—PRS/Prorural (2011) Department of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform—SARA, Support Program in small farmers—Prorural
Reichert LJ, Gomes MC, Schwengber JE, Pereira AS (2013) Evaluation of organic potato production systems in southern of Rio Grande do Sul. Horticultura Brasileira 31(2):220–230
Rosenhead J (1989) Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, England
Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology goes decision aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
Silva LC, Levino NA, dos Santos SL (2012) Sustainable development and family farming: a SWOT analysis. In: Proceedings of XXXII national meeting of production engineering, Bento Gonçalves, 15–18 Oct 2012
Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria decision aid. Wiley, Bruxelles
Wilson KK, Philipp PF, Shaner WW (1986) Socio-cultural effects on the farming systems research and development approach. Agric Syst 19:83–110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
e Silva, L.C., de Almeida Levino, N., dos Santos e Silva, L. (2015). A Proposal Based on Hard and Soft Systems for Public Policies Supporting Family Farms. In: Guarnieri, P. (eds) Decision Models in Engineering and Management. Decision Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11949-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11949-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11948-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11949-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)