Abstract
The cost of CCS is a crucial factor for the deployment of the technologies in industry. In order to analyze the potential of the options the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) approach has been modified to be suitable for industrial processes. In order to allow for a cross-sector comparison, the CO2 avoidance costs (CAC) are assessed as well. Based on a case-specific model plant, the costs for CCS in two carbon-intensive industries, cement production and refineries, are investigated.
For the cement works, the levelized production costs (LPC) are calculated for the reference plant without CCS, and for two CCS options (post-combustion, oxyfuel). For refineries, LPC are calculated for the reference plant without CCS and for a retrofit with oxyfuel technology.
The results show a major increase in LPC for the cement sector from € 84 per tonne cement in the baseline case to € 170/t for the post-combustion option (+102 %) and to € 112/t for the oxyfuel variant (+32 %) respectively. The LPC in the refinery case rise from € 70 per tonne crude oil in the baseline case to € 81/t for the oxyfuel option (+15 %). The CO2 avoidance costs add up to € 143/tCO2 for the cement works with post-combustion capture, € 55/tCO2 for the oxyfuel option and € 62/tCO2 for the oxyfuel refinery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allam R, White V, Ivens N, Simmonds M (2005) The oxyfuel baseline: revamping heaters and boilers to oxyfiring by cryogenic air separation and flue gas recycle. In: Thomas DC, Benson SM (eds) Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geologic formations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 451–475
EEX (2012) European Energy Exchange: Strom Spotmarkt – EPEX SPOT. http://www.eex.com/de/Downloads. 9 Aug 2012
Energy Argus (2011) Petroleum coke. Petroleum coke market prices, news and analysis. Argus Media. http://www.argusmedia.com/Petroleum/Petroleum-Products/~/media/Files/PDFs/Samples/Energy-Argus-Petroleum-Coke.ashx
European Commission (2010) Reference document on best available techniques in the cement, lime and magnesium oxide manufacturing industries. European Commission. http://eippcb.jrc.es/reference/cl.html
Favennec J-P, Pigeyre A (2001) Refining: a technical summary. Investments, margins, costs. Probable future developments. In: Favennec J-P (ed) Refinery operation and management. Editions Technip, Paris, pp 117–170
Fleer J (2011) Technische und ökonomische Analyse von Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) für CO2-intensive Industrieprozesse. Lehrstuhl für Energiesysteme und Energiewirtschaft. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum
Global CCS Institute (2011) Economic assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies. 2011 update. Global CCS Institute, Canberra
IEA GHG (2008) CO2 capture in the cement industry. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. http://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2008-3.pdf
Lindenberger D, Schlesinger M, Lutz C (2010) Energieszenarien für ein Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung. EWI/GWS/PROGNOS, Köln/Osnabrück/Basel
McKinsey (2008) Carbon capture & storage: assessing the economics. http://assets.wwf.ch/downloads/mckinsey2008.pdf
Öko-Institut (2012) Potenziale und Chancen der Technologie zur CO2-Abtrennung und -Ablagerung (CCS) für industrielle Prozessemissionen. WWF, Öko-Institut, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fleer, J., Kuckshinrichs, W. (2015). Cost Analysis for CCS in Selected Carbon-Intensive Industries. In: Kuckshinrichs, W., Hake, JF. (eds) Carbon Capture, Storage and Use. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11943-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11943-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11942-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11943-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)