Skip to main content

A Game-Theoretic Approach to Simulation of Data-Parameterized Systems

  • Conference paper
Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8837))

Abstract

This work focuses on data-parameterized abstract systems that extend standard modelling by allowing atomic propositions to be parameterized by variables that range over some infinite domain. These variables may range over process ids, message numbers, etc. Thus, abstract systems enable simple modelling of infinite-state systems whose source of infinity is the data. We define and study a simulation pre-order between abstract systems. The definition extends the definition of standard simulation by referring also to variable assignments. We define \(\textsc{vctl}^\star\) – an extension of \(\textsc{ctl}^\star\) by variables, which is capable of specifying properties of abstract systems. We show that \(\textsc{vctl}^\star\) logically characterizes the simulation pre-order between abstract systems. That is, that satisfaction of \(\textsc{vactl}^\star\), namely the universal fragment of \(\textsc{vctl}^\star\), is preserved in simulating abstract systems. For the second direction, we show that if an abstract system \({\cal{A}}_2\) does not simulate an abstract system \({\cal{A}}_1\), then there exists a \(\textsc{vactl}\) formula that distinguishes \({\cal{A}}_1\) from \({\cal{A}}_2\). Finally, we present a game-theoretic approach to simulation of abstract systems and show that the prover wins the game iff \({\cal{A}}_2\) simulates \({\cal{A}}_1\). Further, if \({\cal{A}}_2\) does not simulate \({\cal{A}}_1\), then the refuter wins the game and his winning strategy corresponds to a \(\textsc{vactl}\) formula that distinguishes \({\cal{A}}_1\) from \({\cal{A}}_2\). Thus, the many appealing practical advantages of simulation are lifted to the setting of data-parameterized abstract systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paige, R., Bloom, B.: Transformational design and implementation of a new efficient solution to the ready simulation problem. Science of Computer Programming 24, 189–220 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bensalem, S., Bouajjani, A., Loiseaux, C., Sifakis, J.: Property preserving simulations. In: Probst, D.K., von Bochmann, G. (eds.) CAV 1992. LNCS, vol. 663, pp. 260–273. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bojańczyk, M., Muscholl, A., Schwentick, T., Segoufin, L.: Two-variable logic on data trees and XML reasoning. J. ACM 56(3), 1–48 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bojanczyk, M., Muscholl, A., Schwentick, T., Segoufin, L., David, C.: Two-variable logic on words with data. In: LICS 2006, pp. 7–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Browne, M.C., Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O.: Characterizing finite Kripke structures in propositional temporal logic. Theoretical Computer Science 59, 115–131 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement. In: Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P. (eds.) CAV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1855, pp. 154–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleaveland, R., Parrow, J., Steffen, B.: The concurrency workbench: A semantics-based tool for the verification of concurrent systems. ACM TOPLAS 15, 36–72 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Damm, W., Pnueli, A.: Verifying out-of-order executions. In: Proc. 9th Conf. on Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods, pp. 23–47. Chapman & Hall (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Demri, S., D’Souza, D.: An automata-theoretic approach to constraint LTL. In: Agrawal, M., Seth, A.K. (eds.) FSTTCS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2556, pp. 121–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. German, S., Prasad Sistla, A.: Reasoning about systems with many processes. Journal of the ACM 39, 675–735 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Grumberg, O., Kupferman, O., Sheinvald, S.: Variable automata over infinite alphabets. In: Dediu, A.-H., Fernau, H., Martín-Vide, C. (eds.) LATA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6031, pp. 561–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Grumberg, O., Kupferman, O., Sheinvald, S.: Model checking systems and specifications with parameterized atomic propositions. In: Chakraborty, S., Mukund, M. (eds.) ATVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7561, pp. 122–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Grumberg, O., Kupferman, O., Sheinvald, S.: An automata-theoretic approach to reasoning about parameterized systems and specifications. In: Van Hung, D., Ogawa, M. (eds.) ATVA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8172, pp. 397–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Grumberg, O., Long, D.E.: Model checking and modular verification. In: Groote, J.F., Baeten, J.C.M. (eds.) CONCUR 1991. LNCS, vol. 527, pp. 250–265. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Grumberg, O., Long, D.E.: Model checking and modular verification. ACM Transactions on Programming Languagues and Systems 16(3), 843–871 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hallé, S., Villemaire, R., Cherkaoui, O.: Ctl model checking for labelled tree queries. In: TIME, pp. 27–35 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O., Rajamani, S.: Fair simulation. Information and Computation 173(1), 64–81 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaminski, M., Zeitlin, D.: Extending finite-memory automata with non-deterministic reassignment. In: Csuhaj-Varjú, Ézik, Z.E. (eds.) AFL, pp. 195–207 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kesten, Y., Piterman, N., Pnueli, A.: Bridging the gap between fair simulation and trace inclusion. In: Hunt Jr., W.A., Somenzi, F. (eds.) CAV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2725, pp. 381–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamport, L.: Specifying concurrent program modules. ACM Transactions on Programming Languagues and Systems 5, 190–222 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lazić, R.S.: Safely freezing LTL. In: Arun-Kumar, S., Garg, N. (eds.) FSTTCS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4337, pp. 381–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lynch, N.A., Tuttle, M.R.: Hierarchical correctness proofs for distributed algorithms. In: Proc. 6th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 137–151 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lynch, N.A.: Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milner, R.: An algebraic definition of simulation between programs. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 481–489. British Computer Society (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Neven, F., Schwentick, T., Vianu, V.: Towards regular languages over infinite alphabets. In: Sgall, J., Pultr, A., Kolman, P. (eds.) MFCS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2136, pp. 560–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Pnueli, A.: Applications of temporal logic to the specification and verification of reactive systems: A survey of current trends. In: Rozenberg, G., de Bakker, J.W., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) Current Trends in Concurrency. LNCS, vol. 224, pp. 510–584. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Graf, S., Saidi, H.: Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) CAV 1997. LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Shemesh, Y., Francez, N.: Finite-state unification automata and relational languages. Information and Computation 114, 192–213 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Stockmeyer, L.J., Meyer, A.R.: Word problems requiring exponential time. In: Proc. 5th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 1–9 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tan, T.: Pebble Automata for Data Languages: Separation, Decidability, and Undecidability. PhD thesis, Technion - Computer Science Department (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grumberg, O., Kupferman, O., Sheinvald, S. (2014). A Game-Theoretic Approach to Simulation of Data-Parameterized Systems. In: Cassez, F., Raskin, JF. (eds) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. ATVA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8837. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11936-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11936-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11935-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11936-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics