Abstract
The cost for bunker fuel represents a major part of the daily running costs of liner shipping vessels. The vessels, sailing on a fixed roundtrip of ports, can lift bunker at these ports, but prices in each port may be differing and fluctuating. The stock of bunker on a vessel is subject to a number of operational constraints such as capacity limits, reserve requirements and sulphur content. Contracts are often used for bunker purchasing, ensuring supply and often giving a discounted price. A contract can supply any vessel in a period and port, and is thus a shared resource between vessels, which must be distributed optimally to reduce overall costs. An overview of formulations and solution methods is given, and computational results are reported for some representative models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdelghany, K., Abdelghany, A., & Raina, S. (2005). A model for the airlines fuel management strategies. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(4), 199–206.
Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Cerban, M. D. M. (2011). Bunkering competition and competitiveness at the ports of the gibraltar strait. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 911–916.
Besbes, O., & Savin, S. (2009). Going bunkers: The joint route selection and refueling problem. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 11(4), 694–711.
Boutsikas, A. (2004). The bunkering industry and its effect on shipping tanker operations. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Ocean Engineering.
Brouer, B. D., Alvarez, J. F., Plum, C. E. M., Pisinger, D., & Sigurd, M. M. (2013). A base integer programming model and benchmark suite for liner shipping network design. Transportation Science. Accepted by Transportation Science.
Bunkerwire, P. (2013). http://www.platts.com/IM.Platts.Content/ProductsServices/Products/bunkerwire.pdf.
California Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2001). California bunker sales tax. http://www.lao.ca.gov/2001/bunker_fuel/012501_bunker_fuel.html.
Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., & Ronen, D. (2004). Ship routing and scheduling: Status and perspectives. Transportation Science, 38(1), 1–18.
Christiansen, M., Ronen, D., Nygren, B., & Fagerholt, K. (2007). Chapter 4, Maritime transportation. In C. Barnhart & G. Laporte (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 189–284). Elsevier B.V.
Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Nygreen, B., & Ronen, D. (2013). Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(3), 467–483.
Corbett, J. J., Wang, H., & Winebrake, J. J. (2009). The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 593–598.
Fagerholt, K., Laporte, G., & Norstad, I. (2009). Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(3), 523–529.
Farina, F. (2012). Bunker optimization with contracts. Master’s thesis, Universita Di Bologna.
Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U., & Pisinger, D. (2004). Knapsack problems. Springer.
Kim, H. (2014). A lagrangian heuristic for determining the speed and bunkering port of a ship. Journal of the Operational Research Society 65, 747–754.
Kim, H. -J., Chang, Y. -T., Kim, K. -T., & Kim, H. -J. (2012). An epsilon-optimal algorithm considering greenhouse gas emissions for the management of a ship’s bunker fuel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(2), 97–103.
Lin, S. -H. (2008). Finding optimal refueling policies in transportation networks. In R. Fleischer & J. Xu (Eds.), Algorithmic aspects in information and management, (volume 5034 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science), (pp. 280–291). Berlin: Springer.
Marsten, R. E., Hogan, W. W., & Blankenship, J. W. (1975). The boxstep method for large-scale optimization. Operations Research, 23(3), 389–405.
Meng, Q., Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2012). Network design for shipping service of large-scale intermodal liners. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2269, 42–50.
Notteboom, T. E., & Vernimmen, B. (2009). The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 325–337.
Oh, H. C., & Karimi, I. A. (2010). Operation planning of multiparcel tankers under fuel price uncertainty. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(13), 6104–6114.
Plum, C. E. M., & Jensen, P. N. (2007). Minimization of bunker costs. Master’s thesis.
Plum, C. E. M., Pisinger, D., & Sigurd, M. M. (2014). A service flow model for the liner shipping network design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(2), 378–386.
Plum, C. E. M., Pisinger, D., & Jensen, P. N. (2014). Bunker purchasing with contracts. Maritime Economics and Logistics. To appear.
Ronen, D. (2010). The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 211–216.
Sheng, X., Lee, L., & Chew, E. (2014). Dynamic determination of vessel speed and selection of bunkering ports for liner shipping under stochastic environment. OR Spectrum, 36(2), 455–480.
Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics (3rd. ed., 840 p.). London: Routledge.
Stroup, J. S., & Wollmer, R. D. (1992). A fuel management model for the airline industry. Operations Research, 40(2), 229–237.
Suzuki, Y. (2008). A generic model of motor-carrier fuel optimization. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 55(8), 737–746.
Suzuki, Y. (2011). A new truck-routing approach for reducing fuel consumption and pollutants emission. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(1), 73–77.
Vilhelmsen, C., Lusby, R., & Larsen, J. (2014). Tramp ship routing and scheduling with integrated bunker optimization. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 3(2), 143–175.
Wang, S., & Meng, Q. (2012). Robust schedule design for liner shipping services. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(6), 1093–1106.
Wang, S., Meng, Q., & Liu, Z. (2013). Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 53(0), 49–62.
Yao, Z., Ng, S. H., & Lee, L. H. (2012). A study on bunker fuel management for the shipping liner services. Computers and Operations Research, 39(5), 1160–1172.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from The Danish Council for Strategic Research to the ENERPLAN project. This work would not have been possible without the adept guidance and support from experienced Maersk Oil Trading and Maersk Line staff, in particular we would like to thank Claus Anker and Mikkel M. Sigurd who have given invaluable support for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plum, C., Pisinger, D., Jensen, P. (2015). Bunker Purchasing in Liner Shipping. In: Lee, CY., Meng, Q. (eds) Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11891-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11891-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11890-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11891-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)