Skip to main content

Bunker Purchasing in Liner Shipping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics

Abstract

The cost for bunker fuel represents a major part of the daily running costs of liner shipping vessels. The vessels, sailing on a fixed roundtrip of ports, can lift bunker at these ports, but prices in each port may be differing and fluctuating. The stock of bunker on a vessel is subject to a number of operational constraints such as capacity limits, reserve requirements and sulphur content. Contracts are often used for bunker purchasing, ensuring supply and often giving a discounted price. A contract can supply any vessel in a period and port, and is thus a shared resource between vessels, which must be distributed optimally to reduce overall costs. An overview of formulations and solution methods is given, and computational results are reported for some representative models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelghany, K., Abdelghany, A., & Raina, S. (2005). A model for the airlines fuel management strategies. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(4), 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Cerban, M. D. M. (2011). Bunkering competition and competitiveness at the ports of the gibraltar strait. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 911–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besbes, O., & Savin, S. (2009). Going bunkers: The joint route selection and refueling problem. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 11(4), 694–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutsikas, A. (2004). The bunkering industry and its effect on shipping tanker operations. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Ocean Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouer, B. D., Alvarez, J. F., Plum, C. E. M., Pisinger, D., & Sigurd, M. M. (2013). A base integer programming model and benchmark suite for liner shipping network design. Transportation Science. Accepted by Transportation Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunkerwire, P. (2013). http://www.platts.com/IM.Platts.Content/ProductsServices/Products/bunkerwire.pdf.

  • California Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2001). California bunker sales tax. http://www.lao.ca.gov/2001/bunker_fuel/012501_bunker_fuel.html.

  • Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., & Ronen, D. (2004). Ship routing and scheduling: Status and perspectives. Transportation Science, 38(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M., Ronen, D., Nygren, B., & Fagerholt, K. (2007). Chapter 4, Maritime transportation. In C. Barnhart & G. Laporte (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 189–284). Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Nygreen, B., & Ronen, D. (2013). Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(3), 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. J., Wang, H., & Winebrake, J. J. (2009). The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerholt, K., Laporte, G., & Norstad, I. (2009). Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(3), 523–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, F. (2012). Bunker optimization with contracts. Master’s thesis, Universita Di Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U., & Pisinger, D. (2004). Knapsack problems. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2014). A lagrangian heuristic for determining the speed and bunkering port of a ship. Journal of the Operational Research Society 65, 747–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. -J., Chang, Y. -T., Kim, K. -T., & Kim, H. -J. (2012). An epsilon-optimal algorithm considering greenhouse gas emissions for the management of a ship’s bunker fuel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(2), 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S. -H. (2008). Finding optimal refueling policies in transportation networks. In R. Fleischer & J. Xu (Eds.), Algorithmic aspects in information and management, (volume 5034 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science), (pp. 280–291). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsten, R. E., Hogan, W. W., & Blankenship, J. W. (1975). The boxstep method for large-scale optimization. Operations Research, 23(3), 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, Q., Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2012). Network design for shipping service of large-scale intermodal liners. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2269, 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Vernimmen, B. (2009). The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H. C., & Karimi, I. A. (2010). Operation planning of multiparcel tankers under fuel price uncertainty. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(13), 6104–6114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plum, C. E. M., & Jensen, P. N. (2007). Minimization of bunker costs. Master’s thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plum, C. E. M., Pisinger, D., & Sigurd, M. M. (2014). A service flow model for the liner shipping network design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(2), 378–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plum, C. E. M., Pisinger, D., & Jensen, P. N. (2014). Bunker purchasing with contracts. Maritime Economics and Logistics. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, D. (2010). The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, X., Lee, L., & Chew, E. (2014). Dynamic determination of vessel speed and selection of bunkering ports for liner shipping under stochastic environment. OR Spectrum, 36(2), 455–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics (3rd. ed., 840 p.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroup, J. S., & Wollmer, R. D. (1992). A fuel management model for the airline industry. Operations Research, 40(2), 229–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y. (2008). A generic model of motor-carrier fuel optimization. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 55(8), 737–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y. (2011). A new truck-routing approach for reducing fuel consumption and pollutants emission. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(1), 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilhelmsen, C., Lusby, R., & Larsen, J. (2014). Tramp ship routing and scheduling with integrated bunker optimization. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 3(2), 143–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Meng, Q. (2012). Robust schedule design for liner shipping services. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(6), 1093–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Meng, Q., & Liu, Z. (2013). Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 53(0), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Z., Ng, S. H., & Lee, L. H. (2012). A study on bunker fuel management for the shipping liner services. Computers and Operations Research, 39(5), 1160–1172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from The Danish Council for Strategic Research to the ENERPLAN project. This work would not have been possible without the adept guidance and support from experienced Maersk Oil Trading and Maersk Line staff, in particular we would like to thank Claus Anker and Mikkel M. Sigurd who have given invaluable support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian E. M. Plum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plum, C., Pisinger, D., Jensen, P. (2015). Bunker Purchasing in Liner Shipping. In: Lee, CY., Meng, Q. (eds) Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11891-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics