Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Choosing a Business Model of Container Terminal Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 220))

  • 5184 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter empirically identifies the crucial criteria for choosing a business model of container terminal operations from the viewpoint of the Taiwan International Ports Corporation (TIPC)—the former port authority of Kaohsiung, Keelung, Taichung, and Hualien in Taiwan. An analytic hierarchy process approach is employed to assess the relative importance of these criteria and business models. Results indicate that benefit and operational capability are the two most important criteria for selecting business models of container terminal operations. The optimal business model in the short to medium term for TIPC is “wholly-owned, operate-outsourced”, whereas “wholly-owned, operate-owned” is the optimal business model in the long term. Implications of the research findings for port corporations and global terminal operators are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderton, P. M. (2008). Port management and operation (3rd ed.). Informa: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, A. J. (1995). Privatization of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales. Journal of Transport Policy, 2(2), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, S. L., & Lin, Y. J. (2011). Evaluating advanced quay cranes in container terminals. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(4), 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. L. (2009). Port administrative structure change worldwide: Its implication for restructuring port authorities in Taiwan. Transport Reviews, 29(2), 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. H., Lee, D. H., & Cao, J. X. (2012). A combinatorial benders’ cuts algorithm for the quayside operation problem at container terminals. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(1), 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., Dowall, D. E., & Song, D. W. (2010). Evaluating impacts of institutional reforms on port efficiency changes: ownership, corporate structure, and total factor productivity changes of world container ports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(4), 546–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, R.K., Li, C. L., & Lin, W. (2002). Interblock crane deployment in container terminals. Transportation Science, 36(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., & Stewart, R. D. (2010). International logistics—the management of international trade operations (3rd ed.). USA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S., & Verhaeghe, R. J. (2012). The blackwell companion to maritime economics (1st ed.). USA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, J.G. (2008). Shared decision-making—transferring research into practice: The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 418–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewry Maritime Research. (2014). Global container terminal operators annual review and forecast 2013. http://www.drewry.co.uk/news.php?id=232. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • Farrell, S. (2012). The ownership and management structure of container terminal concessions. Maritime Policy and Management, 39(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransoo, J. C., & Lee, C. Y. (2013). The critical role of ocean container transport in global supply chain performance. Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, A. V., & Daganzo, C. F. (2007). Crane double cycling in container ports: Planning methods and evaluation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(8), 875–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, G., & Gupta, H. (1992). Outsourcing the IS function—is it necessary for your organization? Information System Management, 9(3), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, T., Meersman, H., & Moglia, F., Van De Voorde, E. (2000). Do mergers adn alliances influence European shipping and port competition? Maritime Policy and Mangement, 27(4), 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J. G., Lee, D. H., & Cao, J. X. (2014). Storage yard management in maritime container terminals. Transportation Science. (article in advance)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., & Kim, H. B. (2002). The optimal sizing of the storage space and handling facilities for import containers. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(9), 821–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., & Bae, J. W. (2004). A look-ahead dispatching method for automated guided vehicles in automated port container terminals. Transportation Science, 38(2), 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, I., & Villanger, E. (2008). Determinants of foreign direct investment in services. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(2), 518–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C. S., Liao, C. H., Li, C. W., Tai, H. H., Yang, C. C., & Li, C. C. (2012). Development of transshipment market and operations models of Container Berth 75 and Container Berth 120 in the Port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan International Ports Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan, F. W., & Nolan, R. L. (1995). How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance? Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, F., & Bierwirth, C. (2013). A framework for integrated berth allocation and crane operations planning in seaport container terminals. Transportation Science, 47(2), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musso, E., Ferrari, C. & Benacchio, M. (2006). Port investment: Profitability, economic impact and financing. In K. Cullinane & W. Talley (Eds.), Port economics: Research in transport economics (Vol 16, pp. 171–218) Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A., & Yu, K. (2006). Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: An agenda for future research in port competition. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(3), 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy and Management, 28(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2010). The corporate geography of global container terminal operator. Maritime Policy and Management, 39(3), 249–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallis, A. A., Vitsounis, T. K., & Langen, P. W. D. (2010). Port economics, policy and management: Review of an emerging research field. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 115–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petering, M. E. H. (2011). Decision support for yard capacity, fleet composition, truck substitutability, and scalability issues at seaport container terminals. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer, F. G. (1994). Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35(4), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., & Young, R. R. (1994). Global supply chains: Factors influencing outsourcing of logistics functions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 24(6), 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossignol, M. H. L. (2007). Global terminal operators: An overview. the Inter-American Committee on Port (CIP): Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. A., Mitra, S., & Narasimhan, S. (1998). Information systems outsourcing: A study of pre-event firm characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(2), 61–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb-Ibrahimi, M., Castilho, B. D., & Daganzo, C. F. (1993). Storage space vs handling work in container terminals. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 27(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5), 405–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, P. L. (1991). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Taiwan: An alternative approach with time-series data. World Development, 19(2/3), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2013). Review of maritime transport 2013. New York: United Nations Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of application. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, P. (2010). A review of port authority functions: Towards a renaissance? Maritime Policy and Management, 37(3), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vis, I. F. A., & Carlo, H. J. (2010) Sequencing two cooperating automated stacking cranes in a container terminal. Transportation Science, 44(2), 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmans, B. W., Ubbels, B., & Rietveld, P., Nijkamp, P. (2002). Investments in container terminals: Public private partnerships in Europe. Maritime Economics, 4(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Wan, Y. W., Liu, J., & Linn, R. J. (2002). Dynamic crane deployment in container storage yards. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(6), 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Liu, J., Wan, Y. W., Murty, K. G., & Linn, R. J. (2003). Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(10), 883–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. T.L. Yip, Associate Director of the C.Y. Tung Internatinal Centre for Maritime Studies and Dr. Johnny Wan at the Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, for their comments and suggestions which helped to improve the quality of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, C.Y. Tung International Centre for Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong

    Chin-Shan Lu & Pei-Hsuan Chang

Authors
  1. Chin-Shan Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pei-Hsuan Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin-Shan Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Industrial Engineering & Logistics Mgmt, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR

    Chung-Yee Lee

  2. Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Qiang Meng

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lu, CS., Chang, PH. (2015). Choosing a Business Model of Container Terminal Operations. In: Lee, CY., Meng, Q. (eds) Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11891-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation