Skip to main content

Pareto Partial Dominance on Two Selected Objectives MOEA on Many-Objective 0/1 Knapsack Problems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Swarm Intelligence (ICSI 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8794))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2772 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years, multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) have attracted more and more attention, and various approaches have been developed to solve them. This paper proposes a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), namely Pareto partial dominance on two selected objectives MOEA (PPDSO-MOEA), which calculates dominance between solutions using only two selected objectives when choosing parent population. In the proposed algorithm, two objectives are mainly selected with the first and the second largest distances to the corresponding dimension of the best point. PPDSO-MOEA switches the two-objective combination in every I g generation to optimize all of the objective functions. The search performance of the proposed method is verified on many-objective 0/1 knapsack problems. State-of-the-art algorithms including plus .1em minus .1em PPD-MOEA, MOEA/D, UMOEA/D, and an algorithm selecting objectives with random method (RSO) are considered as rival algorithms. The experimental results show that PPDSO-MOEA outperforms all the four algorithms on most scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coello, C.A.C., Lamont, G.B., Veldhuizen, D.A.V.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Miettinen: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Springer, vol. 12 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farina, M., Amato, P.: On the Optimal Solution Definition for Many-Criteria Optimization Problems. In: Proceedings of the NAFIPS-FLINT International Conference, pp. 233–238 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zitzler, E., Künzli, S.: Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. In: Yao, X., et al. (eds.) PPSN VIII 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 832–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan, Y., Jiao, Y., Li, H., et al.: MOEA/D+ uniform design: A new version of MOEA/D for optimization problems with many objectives. Computers & Operations Research 40(6), 1648–1660 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, H.L., Gu, F., Zhang, Q.: Decomposition of a Multiobjective Optimization Problem into a Number of Simple Multiobjective Subproblems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 18(3), 450–455 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deb, K., Jain, H.: An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-point Based Non-dominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems with Box Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation PP(99) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sato, H., Aguirre, H.E., Tanaka, K.: Pareto partial dominance moea and hybrid archiving strategy included cdas in many-objective optimization. In: 2010 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saxena, D., Duro, J., Tiwari, A., Deb, K., Zhang, Q.: Objective reduction in many-objective optimization: Linear and nonlinear algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 17(1), 77–99 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. López Jaimes, A., Coello Coello, C.A., Aguirre, H., et al.: Objective space partitioning using conflict information for solving many-objective problems. Information Sciences 268, 305–327 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato, M., Aguirre, H.E., Tanaka, K.: Effects of δ-Similar Elimination and Controlled Elitism in the NSGA-II Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2006, pp. 1164–1171. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zitzler, E.: Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Methods and applications, vol. 63. Shaker, Ithaca (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wikipedia contributors: Wilcoxon signed−rank test. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (July 1, 2014) (Web July 6, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, J., Yan, M. (2014). Pareto Partial Dominance on Two Selected Objectives MOEA on Many-Objective 0/1 Knapsack Problems. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Coello, C.A.C. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11857-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11857-4_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11856-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11857-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics