Abstract
CP is a deterministic model like WGP in this aspect. Therefore, CP seems inappropriate to select stock portfolios from the Eu(R) maximization theory. In contrast to MV-SGP model, CP does not generalize Markowitz M-V model to multiple objectives. This lack of strictness is mitigated by the linkage between CP and utility theory established in Chap. 8. This linkage allows us to extend utility properties to CP approaches. We show the CP setting for portfolio selection by establishing and graphing its main elements: profitability-safety efficient frontier, ideal point and the bounds of Yu compromise set, which is the landing area on which the profitability-safety utility function reaches its maximum. From these variables, expected return and safety, the portfolio selection problem is defined in terms of CP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arenas-Parra, M., Bilbao Terol, A., & Rodriguez-Uria, M. (2001). A fuzzy oal programming approach to portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2), 287–297.
Arrow, K. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Helsinki: Academic Bookstore.
Badri, M., Davis, D., & Davis, D. (2001). A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19(4), 243–252.
Ballestero, E. (1998). Approximating the optimum portfolio for an investor with particular preferences. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 998–1000.
Ballestero, E., & Romero, C. (1991). A theorem connecting utility function optimization and compromise programming. Operations Research Letters, 10(7), 421–427.
Ballestero, E., & Romero, C. (1996). Portfolio selection: a compromise programming solution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 1377–1386.
Balzer, L. (1994). Measuring investment risk: a review. The Journal of Investing, 3(3), 47–58.
Blasco, F., et al. (1999). On the monotonicity of the compromise set in multicriteria problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 102(1), 69–82.
Blasco, F., et al. (2000). Computing compromise sets in polyhedral framework. Applied Mathematics Letters, 13(5), 93–98.
Copeland, T., & Weston, J. (1988). Financial theory and corporate finance. Reading: Addison Wesley.
Elton, J., & Gruber, M. (1984). Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. New York: Wiley.
Feldstein, M. (1969). Mean mean variance analysis in the theory of liquidity preference and portfolio selection. Review of Economic Studies, 36, 5–12.
Hanock, G., & Levy, H. (1969). The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. Review of Economic Studies, 36, 335–346.
Kallberg, J., & Ziemba, W. (1983). Comparison of alternative utility functions in portfolio selection problems. Management Science, 29(11), 1257–1276.
Kim, G. C., & Emery, J. (2000). An application of zero–one goal programming in project selection and resource planning–a case study from the Woodward Governor Company. Computers & Operations Research, 27(14), 1389–1408.
Konno, H., & Yamazaki, H. (1991). Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Management Science, 37, 519–531.
Kumar, P., & Philippatos, G. (1979). Conflict resolution in investment decisions: implementation of goal programming methodology for dual purpose funds. Decision Sciences, 10(4), 562–576.
Lee, S.M., & Lerro, A.J. (1973). Optimizing portfolio selection for mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 28(5), 1087–1101.
Levy, H. (1974). The rationale of the mean-standard deviation analysis: comment. The American Economic Review, 64, 434–441.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
Markowitz, H. (1970). Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments (Vol. 16). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Markowitz, H. (1987). Mean-variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Moron, M., Romero, C., & Romero Ruiz del Portal, F. (1996). Generating well-behaved utility functions for compromise programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 91(3), 643–649.
Mukherjee, K., & Bera, A. (1995). Application of goal programming in project selection decision: a case study from the Indian coal mining industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(1), 18–25.
Nawrocki, D. (1999). A brief history of downside risk measures. The Journal of Investing, 8(3), 9–25.
Reilly, F.K. (1985). Investment analysis and portfolio management. New York: Dryden Press.
Sortino, F. A., & Forsey, H. J. (1996). On the use and misuse of downside risk. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 22(2), 35–42.
Sortino, F. A., & Price Lee, N. (1994). Performance measurement in a downside risk framework. The Journal of Investing, 3(3), 59–64.
Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behaviour towards risk. Review of Economic Studies, 67, 65–86.
Xidonas, P., et al. (2012). Multicriteria portfolio management. New York/London: Springer.
Yu, P. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19(8), 936–946.
Yu, P. L. (1985). Multiple criteria decision-making: concepts, techniques and extensions. New York: Plenum.
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ballestero, E., Pla-Santamaria, D., Garcia-Bernabeu, A., Hilario, A. (2015). Portfolio Selection by Compromise Programming. In: Ballestero, E., Pérez-Gladish, B., Garcia-Bernabeu, A. (eds) Socially Responsible Investment. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11836-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11836-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11835-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11836-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)