Skip to main content

A Measure of Clinical Outcomes in Dental Implant Surgery Flapless Surgery versus Flap Technique in Posterior Maxilla of Post Menopause Women

  • Conference paper
5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering in Vietnam

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 46))

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the clinical outcomes of implants inserted using split mouth study and to measure patients’ satisfaction using visual analogue scale in flapless and conventional flap techniques in post menopause women age 50 years or over. Materials and methods: This study is a retrospective split mouth study of flapless vs flap technique involving the study of dental records of 16 post-menopause of patients undergoing bilateral implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. A total of 45 implants with no augmentative procedures were selected from 16 patients for the study. The patients were divided into two groups: the control group had 21 implants placed by full flap technique, and the test group consisted of 24 implants inserted using flapless procedure. Only those patients with comprehensive clinical record were included in this study. The treatment outcomes were measured using key words: implant survival, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Periotest, x-ray assessment. Results and Discussion: The results showed that flapless surgery had comparable, similar results as compare to flap surgery: survival rate (95.8% and 95.2%), Using visual analogue scale (VAS=0 to 10), flapless surgery revealed to have less: pain, swelling, bleeding and speech impairment and had better overall satisfaction at one day and one week than flap technique than the flap counterpart (*P<0.05). No significant difference in bone resorption at 3 months. After one year, bone change in the flap group vs the flapless group was statistically significant [-0.53 (±0.57) vs +0.08 (±0.49), **P<0.005]. No significant difference in Periotest value (PTV). Conclusion: This study showed that implant flapless surgery is a minimal invasive, effective, and novel technique that can render a significantly better early stage satisfaction outcome as compare to the traditional flap method. Flapless implantation resulted in minimal bone loss, less pain, less complications, and comparable good PTV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nguyen, M., Doan, N., Du, Z., Reher, P., Xiao, Y. (2015). A Measure of Clinical Outcomes in Dental Implant Surgery Flapless Surgery versus Flap Technique in Posterior Maxilla of Post Menopause Women. In: Toi, V., Lien Phuong, T. (eds) 5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering in Vietnam. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11776-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11776-8_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11775-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11776-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics