Advertisement

Perceptual Evaluation of Demosaicing Artefacts

  • Tomasz Sergej
  • Radosław MantiukEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8814)

Abstract

Most of the digital camera sensors are equipped with the Colour Filter Arrays (CFAs) that split the light into the red, green, and blue colour components. Every photodiode in the sensor is capable to register only one of these components. The demosaicing techniques were developed to fill the missing values, however, they distort a scene data and introduce artefacts in images. In this work we propose a novel evaluation technique which judge a perceptual visibility of the demosaicing artefacts rather than compares images based on typical mathematically-based metrics, like MSE or PSNR. We conduct subjective experiments in which people manually mark the visible local artefacts. Then, the detection map averaged over a number of observers and scenes is compared with results generated by the objective image quality metrics. This procedure judges the efficiency of these automatic metrics and reveals that the HDR-VDP-2 metric outperforms SSIM, S-CIELAB, and also MSE in evaluation of the demosaicing artefacts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Laroche, M., Prescott, C.A.: Apparatus and method for adaptively interpolating a full color image utilizing chrominance gradients (1994) U.S. Patent no. 5 373 322Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirakawa, K., Parks, T.W.: Adaptive Homogeneity-Directed Demosaicing Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 14, 360–369 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Mean Squared Error: Love It or Leave It? IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 26, 98–117 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, X.M., Wandell, B.A.: A spatial extension to cielab for digital color image reproduction. In: Proceedings of the SID Symposiums, pp. 731–734 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., Simoncelli, E.: Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 600–612 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mantiuk, R., Kim, K.J., Rempel, A.G., Heidrich, W.: Hdr-vdp-2: A calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 40:1–40:14 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Čadík, M., Herzog, R., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.P.: New measurements reveal weaknesses of image quality metrics in evaluating graphics artifacts. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. of SIGGRAPH Asia) 31, 1–10 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mantiuk, R.K., Tomaszewska, A.M., Mantiuk, R.: Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 2478–2491 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hibbard, R.: Apparatus and method for adaptively interpolating a full color image utilizing luminance gradients (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coffin, D.: dcraw: camera RAW file format parser (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Chauvin, Y., Anderson, C.A.F., Nielsen, H.: Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview. Bioinformatics 16, 640–648 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.: Modern Image Quality Assessment. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu, H., Rao, K.: Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding. CRC Press (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Čadík, M., Herzog, R., Mantiuk, R.K., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., Seidel, H.P.: Learning to predict localized distortions in rendered images. Comput. Graph. Forum 32, 401–410 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salkind, N.: Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. A Sage reference publication. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ledda, P., Chalmers, A., Troscianko, T., Seetzen, H.: Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a high dynamic range display. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. of SIGGRAPH 2005) 24, 640–648 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer ScienceWest Pomeranian University of Technology, SzczecinSzczecinPoland

Personalised recommendations