Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 1148 Accesses

Abstract

Increasing competition as well as more and more multifaceted customer requirements make great demands to firms nowadays. The resulting concentration on core business however implicates further complexity, because coordination of activities has to be effected not only within one single company, but in fact across the entire supply chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cf. Zimmermann (2005): Supply Chain Koordination, p. 1. A supply chain can be defined as “…the network of organizations that are involved, through upstream and downstream linkages, in the different processes and activities that produce value in the form of products and services in the hands of the ultimate consumer” (Christopher (2006): Logistics and supply chain management, p. 17). For an overview on other definitions of that term, see also Mentzer et al. (2001): Defining supply chain management.

  2. 2.

    See, e.g., the reviews in Arshinder and Deshmukh (2008): Supply chain coordination, Leng and Parlar (2005): Game theoretic applications, Maloni and Benton (1997): Supply chain partnerships, and Nagarajan and Sošić (2008): Game-theoretic analysis.

  3. 3.

    See, e.g., the review in Sarmah et al. (2006): Buyer vendor coordination models.

  4. 4.

    See, e.g., the book of Ingene and Parry (2004): Mathematical models, which contains different approaches to ensure channel coordination.

  5. 5.

    Cf. Zentralverband der deutschen Werbewirtschaft (2013): Werbung in Deutschland 2013, p. 11, and Kantar Media (2013): U.S. advertising expenditures (Press release, 11.03.2013).

  6. 6.

    Cf.  Zentralverband der deutschen Werbewirtschaft (2013): Werbung in Deutschland 2013, p. 208.

  7. 7.

    Cf. Jauschowetz (1995): Marketing im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel, p. 236, Oehme (2001): Handels-Marketing, p. 444, and Pepels (1995): Handels-Marketing, p. 260.

  8. 8.

    Cf. Somers et al. (1990): Cooperative advertising expenditures, p. 36.

  9. 9.

    According to National Register Publishing, $50 billion cooperative advertising funds are available to retailers in the United States (cf. National Register Publishing (2013): Co-op advertising sourcebook). A survey of empirical data on cooperative advertising programs is given in Sect. 3.2.

  10. 10.

    See Dierig (2012): Krombacher and Dierig (2013): Schweppes.

  11. 11.

    Please note that we use the masculine forms “he” and “his” when referring to general notations like manufacturer, retailer, player, competitor, etc. throughout this work for the sake of convenience.

  12. 12.

    See, e.g., the introductory section of Jensen and Bard (2003): Operations research, pp. 2–12.

  13. 13.

    Please note that each of these chapters also represents one separate research article. These four research articles constitute this cumulative dissertation.

  14. 14.

    See Xie and Wei (2009): Coordinating advertising and SeyedEsfahani et al. (2011): Vertical co-op advertising.

  15. 15.

    SeyedEsfahani et al. (2011) use this restriction both in the Nash and in Retailer Stackelberg game (cf. SeyedEsfahani et al. (2011): Vertical co-op advertising, p. 266). The same restriction can be found in Xie and Neyret (2009), though this article bases on a different demand function (cf. Xie and Neyret (2009): Co-op advertising, p. 1377).

  16. 16.

    This comment refers to the so-called Competitive-Substitutability Hypothesis established by Ingene and Parry (2007): It describes the counterintuitive effect that stronger competition between the retailers leads to rising prices and profits when using the cross-price parameter within a linear price demand curve as a measure for competition (cf. Ingene and Parry (2007): Bilateral monopoly, pp. 599 et seq.). For instance, this effect can be observed in Yang and Zhou (2006), who consider a one-manufacturer two-retailer supply chain where only prices are decision variables (cf. Yang and Zhou (2006): Two-echelon supply chain models, p. 113). To overcome this issue, Ingene and Parry (2007) propose to derive the price demand function from the customers’ utility function.

  17. 17.

    See Ingene and Parry (2007): Bilateral monopoly.

  18. 18.

    See Zadeh (1965): Fuzzy sets.

Bibliography

  • Arshinder, A. K., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2008). Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 316–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2006). Logistics and supply chain management: Creating value-added networks (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierig, C. (2012). Darum wirft Kaufland Krombacher aus Sortiment. DIE WELT, 16.07.2012, http://www.welt.de/108306922. Visited on 28 October 2013.

  • Dierig, C. (2013). Schweppes fliegt bei Kaufland aus dem Regal. DIE WELT, 22.04.2013, http://www.welt.de/115510749. Visited on 28 October 2013.

  • Ingene, C. A., & Parry, M. E. (2004). Mathematical models of distribution channels. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingene, C. A., & Parry, M. E. (2007). Bilateral monopoly, identical distributors, and game-theoretic analyses of distribution channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(4), 586–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauschowetz, D. (1995). Marketing im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel: Industrie und Handel zwischen Kooperation und Konfrontation. Wien: Wirtschaftsverlag Ueberreuter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. A., & Bard, J. F. (2003). Operations research: Models and methods. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantar Media (2013). Kantar Media reports U.S. advertising expenditures increased 3 % in 2012. Press Release, 11.03.2013, http://kantarmediana.com/intelligence/press/us-advertising-expenditures-increased-3-percent-2012. Visited on 27 October 2013.

  • Leng, M., & Parlar, M. (2005). Game theoretic applications in supply chain management: A review. Information Systems and Operational Research, 43(3), 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M. J., & Benton, W. C. (1997). Supply chain partnerships: Opportunities for operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 101(3), 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Soonhoong, M., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management: Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan, M., & Sošić, G. (2008). Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagler, M. (2006). An exploratory analysis of the determinants of cooperative advertising participation rates. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Register Publishing (2013). The co-op advertising programs sourcebook Book description, http://www.co-opsourcebook.com. Visited on 06 November 2013.

  • Oehme, W. (2001). Handels-Marketing: Die Handelsunternehmen auf dem Weg vom Absatzmittler zur markanten Retail Brand (3rd ed.). München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepels, W. (1995). Handels-Marketing und Distributionspolitik: Das Konzept des Absatzkanalmanagements. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmah, S. P., Acharya, D., & Goyal, S. K. (2006). Buyer vendor coordination models in supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SeyedEsfahani, M. M., Biazaran, M., & Gharakhani, M. (2011). A game theoretic approach to coordinate pricing and vertical co-op advertising in manufacturer-retailer supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(2), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, T. M., Gupta, Y. P., & Harriot, S. R. (1990). Analysis of cooperative advertising expenditures: A transfer-function modeling approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(5), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., & Neyret, A. (2009). Co-op advertising and pricing models in manufacturer-retailer supply chains. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4), 1375–1385,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., & Wei, J. C. (2009). Coordinating advertising and pricing in a manufacturer-retailer channel. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 785–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S.-L., & Zhou, Y.-W. (2006). Two-echelon supply chain models: Considering duopolistic retailers’ different competitive behaviors. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentralverband der deutschen Werbewirtschaft (2013). Werbung in Deutschland 2013. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M. (2005). Supply Chain Koordination im Wettbewerbsumfeld. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aust, G. (2015). Introduction. In: Vertical Cooperative Advertising in Supply Chain Management. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11626-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics