Abstract
The authors present and discuss the conceptual and technical design of the game Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) Challenge 2050, developed with and for the Netherlands’ ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. The main question in this paper is: What constitutes the socio-technical complexity of marine areas and how can it be translated into a simulation model for serious game-play with marine spatial planners? MSP Challenge 2050 was launched in March 2014 in a two day session with twenty marine planners from six countries. It aims to initiate and support MSP in the various Atlantic regions by bringing policy-makers, stakeholders, scientists together in a ‘playful’ but realistic and meaningful environment. In the North Sea edition of the game, six countries make and implement plans for this sea basin over a period of 35 years, with cumulative effects of their sectoral and national decisions emerging. The authors conclude that the combined and iterative use of complexity modelling and gaming is effective from the perspectives of design (development of a MSP model), research (insight acquired on MSP) and policy (policy-oriented learning and analysis for MSP). Further development and global dissemination of MSP Challenge 2050, as well as research and data collection, is foreseen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Byrne, D.: Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. Routledge, London (2001)
Misuraca, G., Broster, D., Centeno, C.: Digital Europe 2030: Designing Scenarios for ICT in Future Governance and Policy Making. Gov. Inf. Q. (2012)
FETPROACT-1-2014, http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/2074-fetproact-1-2014.html (accessed: April 04, 2014)
Global Systems Science - European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/en/content/global-systems-science (accessed: April 04, 2014)
Pahl-Wostl, C., Schlumpf, C., Bussenschutt, M., Schonborn, A., Burse, J.: Models at the interface between science and society: impacts and options. Integr. Assess. 1, 267–280 (2000)
Head, B.W.B.: Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Public Policy 3(2), 18 (2008)
Nowotny, H.: The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction: Emergent Interfaces between the Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences. Theory, Cult. Soc. 22(5), 15–31 (2005)
Commission of the European Community, Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: Achieving Common Principles in the EU, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium (2008)
Commission of the European Community, Maritime Spatial Planning in the EU – Achievements and Future Development, Luxembourg, COM (2010) 771 (2011)
Commission of the European Community, Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council, establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal management, vol. 0074 (2013)
Maritim Affairs and Fisheries Newsroom, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/mare/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=15072&subweb=342&lang=en (accessed: April 08, 2014)
Halpern, B.S., Kappel, C.V., Selkoe, K.A., Micheli, F., Ebert, C.M., Kontgis, C., Crain, C.M., Martone, R.G., Shearer, C., Teck, S.J.: Mapping cumulative human impacts to California Current marine ecosystems. Conserv. Lett. 2(3), 138–148 (2009)
Christensen, V., Walters, C.J.: Ecopath with Ecosim: Methods, Capabilities and Limitations. Ecol. Modell. 172(2-4), 109–139 (2004)
Voyer, M., Gladstone, W., Goodall, H.: Methods of social assessment in Marine Protected Area planning: Is public participation enough? Mar. Policy 36(2), 432–439 (2012)
Jay, S., Street, H., Sheffield, S.: Spatial Planning and the Development of Offshore Wind Farms in the United Kingdom 1. Renew. Energy, 1–10 (2007)
Kannen, A., Burkhard, B.: Integrated Assessment of Coastal and Marine Changes Using the Example of Offshore Wind Farms: the Coastal Futures Approach. GAIA - Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 18(3), 229–238 (2009)
Huxham, M., Sumner, D., Park, M.: Emotion, Science and Rationality: The Case of the Brent Spar. Environ. Values 8(3), 349–368 (1999)
Side, J.: The Future of North Sea Oil Industry Abandonment in the Light of the Brent Spar Decision. Mar. Policy 21(1), 45–52 (1997)
Duke, R.D.: Gaming: the Future’s Language. SAGE Publications (1974)
Mayer, I.S., Zhou, Q., Lo, J., Abspoel, L., Keijser, X., Olsen, E., Nixon, E., Kannen, A.: Integrated, Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning: Design and Results of a Game-based Quasi-Experiment. Ocean Coast. Manag. 82, 7–26 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mayer, I., Zhou, Q., Keijser, X., Abspoel, L. (2014). Gaming the Future of the Ocean: The Marine Spatial Planning Challenge 2050. In: Ma, M., Oliveira, M.F., Baalsrud Hauge, J. (eds) Serious Games Development and Applications. SGDA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8778. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11623-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11623-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11622-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11623-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)