Skip to main content

The Hidden Perils of Addressing Complexity with Formal Process - A Philosophical and Empirical Analysis

  • Conference paper
Complex Systems Design & Management

Abstract

This paper analyzes ethnographic interview data at two different points in time to assess the impact of formal process on the production process in a systems engineering context. While formal processes are adopted by organizations to grapple with increasing levels of complexity, they nonetheless make strong assumptions about the nature of work and the nature of the worker leading to unintended consequences. The fields of philosophy of technology and labor studies each pose deep questions about the nature of work and technology and how changes in them affect human experience and provide a compelling context in which to analyze the ethnographic data. We conclude that formal processes tend to ignore the social dynamics of the production process resulting in systemic quality problems. We also conclude that both the philosophy of technology and labor studies would benefit from a more social rather than individualistic framing of technology and production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Johnson, N.F.: Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory. Oneworld Publications (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wiener, N.: The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Da Capo Series in Science (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weber, M.: Bureaucracy. In: Shafritz, J.M., Ott, J.S. (eds.) Classics of Organization Theory, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., CA (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perrow, C.: Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shafritz, J.M., Ott, J.S. (eds.): Classics of Organization Theory, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., CA (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arrow, K.: The Limits of Organization. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  7. March, J., Simon, H.: Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Juran, J.M.: The Quality Trilogy, Quality Progress (August 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. CMMI Product Team: Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Version 1.1. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Schrum, S.: CMMI for Development: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heidegger, M.: The Question Concerning Technology. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Harper & Row Publishers (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ihde, D.: Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Paragon House Publishers, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ihde, D.: Heidegger’s Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Nugent, P., Ali, A.: Frankenstein’s other Monster: Toward a Philosophy of Information Security. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 10(4) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marx, K.: Karl Marx, Selected Writings in Sociology & Social Philosophy. Translated by T. B. Bottomore. McGraw-Hill, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blauner, R.: Alienation and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Braverman, H.: Labor and Monopoly Capital. Monthly Review Press, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burawoy, M.: Manufacturing Consent. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clawson, D.: Bureaucracy and the Labor Process. Monthly Review Press, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Edwards, R.: Contested Terrain. Basic Books, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zuboff, S.: In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barley, S.R.: Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organization Studies. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 404–441 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spradley, J.P.: The Ethnographic Interview. Harcourt Brace Javonovich College Publishers, Fort Worth (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Nugent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nugent, P., Collar, E. (2015). The Hidden Perils of Addressing Complexity with Formal Process - A Philosophical and Empirical Analysis. In: Boulanger, F., Krob, D., Morel, G., Roussel, JC. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11617-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11617-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11616-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11617-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics