Skip to main content

Harnessing Youth Activism with/in Undergraduate Education: A Case Study of Change Lab

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EcoJustice, Citizen Science and Youth Activism

Abstract

This report captures stories told by key stakeholders involved in the development and current offering of the Change Lab program. It attempts to honor the voices of many (but not all) of those involved in its inception including former and current students who conceived of this form of undergraduate education in the first place. These players (co-authors on this chapter) act either as leaders in the design of our experience-based, dialogue-driven project or as active participants, steering the development of future forms the program might take. Through their innovation, passion, and commitment, they provide insight into the power of dialogue and sustainability education that (in this case) is focused on the improvement of the university campus as a living lab for sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barak, M., Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (2007). Purposefully teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skill: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, K. N., & Scott, W. (1998). Deconstructing action competence: Developing a case for a more scientifically-attentive environmental education. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five Es: A referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3, 162–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggs-Rapport, F. (2000). Combining methodological approaches in research: Ethnography and interpretive phenomenology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClaren, M., & Hammond, B. (2005). Integrating education and action in environmental education. In E. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Environmental education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, A. (2012). The activists’ handbook: A step-by-step guide to participatory democracy. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnack, K. (1994). Some further comments on the action competence debate. In B. B. Jensen & K. Schnack (Eds.), Action and action comments as key concepts in critical pedagogy (Studies in educational theory and curriculum, Vol. 12, p. 190). Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. B. (2007). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, E. J., & Jickling, B. (2002). “Sustainability” in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaning learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller, U. (2011). From teaching-to-know-to-learning-to-think for sustainability: What should it take? And how to do it? Journal of Modern Education Review, 1, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller, U. (2012). Science education for global sustainability: What is necessary for teaching, learning, and assessment strategies? Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller, U., & Nahum, T. L. (2011). From teaching to KNOW to learning to THINK in science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 209–229). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Zandvliet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Desjardins, A., Hauser, S., McRae, J.A., Ormond, C.G.A., Rogers, D., Zandvliet, D.B. (2015). Harnessing Youth Activism with/in Undergraduate Education: A Case Study of Change Lab . In: Mueller, M., Tippins, D. (eds) EcoJustice, Citizen Science and Youth Activism. Environmental Discourses in Science Education, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11608-2_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics