Abstract
Attempting to ground scientific knowledge in a relevant and meaningful context, the use of socioscientific issues (SSI) in the classroom seeks to encourage students to formulate a critical understanding of the interface between science, society and technology. While rhetoric on SSI in the science education community posits lofty goals such as citizenship education, enhancing students’ connections to science, and empowering students for the betterment of society (Sadler et al. 2007), more research is now needed to investigate fully the potential of these targets. Most of the SSI research focuses heavily on the development of students’ argumentation skills and consideration of multiple views in deliberation about controversial issues such as climate change and genetic engineering (Kolstø et al. 2006). While these are indeed valuable aims centered on important global issues, it is also imperative that SSI-focused education be situated in students’ local communities, connected to their immediate interests, and tied to reflections upon their personal views and the critical dissection of multiple perspectives. Bolstering the SSI and local community connection provides opportunities for students to become active participants and contributors in their community (Hodson 2003).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Calabrese Barton, A. (2012). Citizen(s’) science. Democracy & Education, 20(2), Article 12.
Callon, M. (1999). The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science Technology & Society, 4, 81–94.
Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research; A theoretical and practical guide. New York/London: Routledge.
Cohn, J. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58, 192–197.
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: Politics of local knowledge. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645–670.
Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 426–440.
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
Kolstø, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., & Mathiassen, K. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socio- scientific issues. Science Education, 90, 632–655.
Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119.
Melear, C. (1999). Middle and secondary science teacher opinions about working in scientists laboratories during preservice preparation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 4(2), 573–597.
Mueller, M. P., Tippins, D. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2011). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20(1), 1–12.
Pouliot, C. (2008). Students’ inventory of social actors concerned by the controversy surrounding cellular telephones: A case study. Science Education, 92, 543–559.
Reis, P., & Galvao, C. (2009). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13, 165–188.
Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Revue canadienne de l’enseignement des sciences, des mathématiques et des technologies/Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4, 1–27.
Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.
Sadler, T. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235–256.
Sadler, T., Barab, S., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391.
Schusler, T., & Krasny, M. (2007). Youth participation in local environmental action: An avenue for science and civic learning? In A. Reid, B. Jensen, J. Nikel, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability (pp. 268–284). Dordrecht: Springer.
Wilderman, C. C., Barron, A., & Imgrund, L. (2004, May 17–20). Top down or bottom up? ALLARMs experience with two operational models for community science. In Proceedings of the 2004 national monitoring conference. National Water Quality Monitoring Council, Chattanooga, TN. Online: http://acwi.gov/monitoring/conference/2004/proceedings_contents/13_titlepages/posters/poster_235.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Journal Prompts for PSTs
Appendix: Journal Prompts for PSTs
-
1.
Describe ways in which science is a part of your daily life.
-
2.
Does the science you learn in school resonate with your own interests? In what ways?
-
3.
Do you feel included in the process of science? How?
-
4.
A section of the survey asked about your connections to environmental issues. What reactions did you have here?
-
5.
How well have your science classes encouraged collaboration and cooperation between the students and the scientific community?
-
6.
What kind of role do teachers play in the processes of science?
-
7.
How would you describe the relationship you have with science?
-
8.
Give an example of a time when you or other students had some input in the scientific community.
-
9.
Do you think it’s important for students to be engaged in the scientific community?
-
10.
Imagine that the school made collaborating with scientists a requirement for all students. Would you agree or disagree with this decision?
-
11.
Have you ever been involved with the scientific community? Why would this be a draw for students to join these communities?
-
12.
What suggestions would you have for students collaborating with scientists?
-
13.
Describe your experience at the community collaboration.
-
14.
Tell me your understanding of the nature of science.
-
15.
In what ways was the nature of science underscored in your collaboration with scientists? In what ways was it not?
-
16.
Imagine an ideal experience of democratic participation in science. What does it look like?
-
19.
Did you feel listened to by the scientific community? How important was your voice?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cook, K. (2015). Democratic Participation with Scientists Through Socioscientific Inquiry. In: Mueller, M., Tippins, D. (eds) EcoJustice, Citizen Science and Youth Activism. Environmental Discourses in Science Education, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11608-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11608-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11607-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11608-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)