Advertisement

Understanding Information Requirements in “Text Only” Pedestrian Wayfinding Systems

  • William Mackaness
  • Phil Bartie
  • Candela Sanchez-Rodilla Espeso
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8728)

Abstract

Information that enables an urban pedestrian to get from A to B can come in many forms though maps are generally preferred. However, given the cognitive load associated with map reading, and the desire to make discrete use of mobile technologies, there is increasing interest in systems that deliver wayfinding information solely by means of georeferenced spoken utterances that essentially leave the user “technology free.” As a critical prior step, this paper examines the optimal delivery of such georeferenced text based instructions in anticipation of their spoken utterance. We identify the factors governing the content, location of instruction and frequency of delivery of text instructions such that a pedestrian can confidently follow a prescribed route, without reference to a map. We report on street level experiments in which pedestrians followed a sequence of text instructions delivered at key points along a set of routes. In examining instructions that are easy to follow, we compare landmark based instructions with street name based instructions. Results show that a landmark based approach is preferred because it is easier to assimilate (not because it is faster). Analysis also revealed that some degree of redundancy in the instructions is required in order to bring “comfort” to the user’s progress. There still remains the challenge of modeling the saliency of landmarks, knowing what is the most efficient set of instructions, and how to vary the frequency of instruction according to the complexity of the route. The paper concludes by identifying a set of design heuristics useful in the design of text based instructions for wayfinding.

Keywords

Cognitive Load Situational Awareness Salient Object City Model Urban Morphology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Raper, J., et al.: Applications of Location Based Services: A Selected Review. Journal of Location Based Services 1(2), 89–111 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bilandzic, M., Foth, M.: A review of locative media, mobile and embodied spatial interaction. Journal of Human Computer Studies 70(1), 66–71 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang, B., Yao, X.: Location-Based Services and GIS in Perspective. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 30(6), 712–725 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldauf, M., et al.: Comparing Viewing and Filtering Techniques for Mobile Urban Exploration. Journal of Location Based Services 5(1), 38–57 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kray, C., Baus, J., Cheverst, K.: A Survey of Map-Based Mobile Guides. In: Zipf, A. (ed.) Map Based Mobile Services - Theories Methods and Implementations, pp. 197–216. Springer, London (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kray, C., et al.: Presenting route instructions on Mobile Devices. In: Proceedings of the 8th Internatioanl Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 117–124. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weisser, M., Brown, J.S.: Designing Calm Technology. In: Rutowski, T. (ed.) Annual of the American Center for Design, T, pp. 159–163. Watson-Guptill Publications, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunlop, M., Brewster, S.: The Challenge of Mobile Devices for Human Computer Interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6(4), 235–236 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frohlich, P., Simon, R., Baillie, L.: Mobile Spatial Interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13(4), 251–253 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackaness, W.A., et al.: SpaceBook: Designing and Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Based Systems for Urban Exploration. In: GISRUK 2013. Liverpool (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janarthanam, S., et al.: A Multi-threaded Conversational Interface for Pedestrian Navigation and Question Answering. In: SIGDIAL 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bartie, P.J., Mackaness, W.A.: Development of a speech-based augmented reality system to support exploration of cityscape. Transactions in GIS 10, 63–86 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheverst, K., et al.: Developing a Context-aware Electronic Tourist Guide: Some Issues and Experiences. In: Proceedings of CHI 2000, Netherlands, pp. 17–24 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gluck, M.: Making Sense of Human Wayfinidng: Review of Cogntive and Lingusitic Knowledge for Personal Navigation with a New Research Direction. In: Mark, D.M., Frank, A. (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, pp. 117–135. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Golledge, R.: Place Recognition and Wayfinding: Making Sense of Space. Geoforum 23(2), 199–214 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caduff, D., Timpf, S.: On the Assessment of Landmark Salience for Human Navigation. Cognitive Processing 9, 249–267 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Millonig, A., Schechtner, K.: Developing Landmark Based Pedestrian Navigation Systems. In: 8th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raubal, M., Winter, S.: Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tom, A., Denis, M.: Referring to Landmark or Street Information in Route Directions: What Difference Does it Make? In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 362–374. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tom, A., Dennis, M.: Language and Spatial Cognition: Comparing the Roles of Landmarks and Street Names in Route Instructions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 18, 1213–1230 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klippel, A., Winter, S.: Structural Salience of Landmarks for Route Directions. In: Cohn, A.G., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winter, S., et al.: Landmark Hierarchies in Context. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35(3), 381–398 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bartie, P.J., Mills, S., Kingham, S.: An Egocentric Urban Viewshed: A Method for Landmark Visibility Mapping for Pedestrian Location Based Services. In: Moore, A., Drecki, I. (eds.) Geospatial Vision. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    May, A.J., et al.: Pedestrian Navigation Aids: Information Requirements and Design Principles. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7(6), 331–338 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Michon, P.-E., Denis, M.: When and Why are Visual Landmarks Used in Giving Directions. In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tversky, B.: Pictorial and verbal encoding in short-term memory. Percept. Psychophysics 6, 225–233 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Endsley, M.R.: Towards a Theory of Situational Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors 37, 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nothegger, C.: Automatic Selection of Landmarks. In: Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics. University of Technology, Vienna (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nothegger, C., Winter, S., Raubal, M.: Selection of Salient Features for Route Directions. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2, 113–136 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schroder, C., Mackaness, W.A., Gittings, B.: Automating the Provision of Route Directions: The Requirements for Pedestrian Navigation Systems. Transactions in GIS 15(3), 419–438 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Raubal, M., Egenhofer, M.: Comparing the Complexity of Wayfinding Tasks in Built Environments. Environment and Planning B 25(6), 895–913 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Timpf, S., Heye, C.: Complexity of Routes in Multi Modal Wayfinding. In: GIScience 2002, Boulder, Colorado (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Mackaness
    • 1
  • Phil Bartie
    • 1
  • Candela Sanchez-Rodilla Espeso
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GeoSciencesThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations