Abstract
Welcome to this book. For a long time it has been difficult to defend disciplinary-based knowledge and education for progressive purposes. The default setting in the field is that disciplinarity is the reactionary position and transdisciplinarity the progressive position. We propose that disciplinarity and transdisciplinarity are complementary aspects of a single, more complex whole: routine scholarly work. On this basis, the relationship between the two is not problematic. This is evident in the scope of interest in this form of inquiry. Topics in ecology, care, finance and gender studies have all embraced the multidisciplinary approach, not in some hegemonic way but as a process that, alongside disciplinary expertise, can render problems solvable. In this way transdisciplinarity is evolving where there are several approaches to understanding, and these are reflected in the chapters of this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Charter of Transdisciplinarity. (1994). http://basarab.nicolescu.perso.sfr.fr/ciret/english/charten.htm. Accessed 12 June 2012.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S116–S123.
Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinary knowledge. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawrence, R. J. (2010). Beyond disciplinary confinement to imaginative transdisciplinarity. In V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris, & J. Y. Russell (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems (pp. 16–30). Washington: Earthscan.
Manderson, D. (1998). Some considerations about transdisciplinarity: A new metaphysics? In Transdisciplinarity: Stimulating synergies, integrating knowledge. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001146/114694eo.pdf (npn). Accessed 12 June 2012.
Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity-levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 19–38.
Nowotny, H. (2006). The potential of transdisciplinary interdisciplines. http://www.interdisciplines.org. Accessed 1 July 2014.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Rethinking science: Knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pohl, C., & Hadorn, G. H. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research (trans: A. B. Zimmerman). Munich: OEKOM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibbs, P. (2015). Introduction. In: Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Professional Learning and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11590-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11590-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11589-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11590-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)