Skip to main content
  • 1561 Accesses

Abstract

Welcome to this book. For a long time it has been difficult to defend disciplinary-based knowledge and education for progressive purposes. The default setting in the field is that disciplinarity is the reactionary position and transdisciplinarity the progressive position. We propose that disciplinarity and transdisciplinarity are complementary aspects of a single, more complex whole: routine scholarly work. On this basis, the relationship between the two is not problematic. This is evident in the scope of interest in this form of inquiry. Topics in ecology, care, finance and gender studies have all embraced the multidisciplinary approach, not in some hegemonic way but as a process that, alongside disciplinary expertise, can render problems solvable. In this way transdisciplinarity is evolving where there are several approaches to understanding, and these are reflected in the chapters of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Charter of Transdisciplinarity. (1994). http://basarab.nicolescu.perso.sfr.fr/ciret/english/charten.htm. Accessed 12 June 2012.

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S116–S123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinary knowledge. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2010). Beyond disciplinary confinement to imaginative transdisciplinarity. In V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris, & J. Y. Russell (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems (pp. 16–30). Washington: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, D. (1998). Some considerations about transdisciplinarity: A new metaphysics? In Transdisciplinarity: Stimulating synergies, integrating knowledge. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001146/114694eo.pdf (npn). Accessed 12 June 2012.

  • Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity-levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H. (2006). The potential of transdisciplinary interdisciplines. http://www.interdisciplines.org. Accessed 1 July 2014.

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Rethinking science: Knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, C., & Hadorn, G. H. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research (trans: A. B. Zimmerman). Munich: OEKOM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Gibbs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibbs, P. (2015). Introduction. In: Gibbs, P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Professional Learning and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11590-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics