Skip to main content

Inductive Learning of Answer Set Programs

  • Conference paper
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8761))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Existing work on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) has focused mainly on the learning of definite programs or normal logic programs. In this paper, we aim to push the computational boundary to a wider class of programs: Answer Set Programs. We propose a new paradigm for ILP that integrates existing notions of brave and cautious semantics within a unifying learning framework whose inductive solutions are Answer Set Programs and examples are partial interpretations We present an algorithm that is sound and complete with respect to our new notion of inductive solutions. We demonstrate its applicability by discussing a prototype implementation, called ILASP (Inductive Learning of Answer Set Programs), and evaluate its use in the context of planning. In particular, we show how ILASP can be used to learn agent’s knowledge about the environment. Solutions of the learned ASP program provide plans for the agent to travel through the given environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corapi, D., Russo, A., Lupu, E.: Inductive logic programming as abductive search. In: ICLP (Technical Communications), pp. 54–63 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Corapi, D., Russo, A., Lupu, E.: Inductive logic programming in answer set programming. In: Muggleton, S.H., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Lisi, F.A. (eds.) ILP 2011. LNCS, vol. 7207, pp. 91–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. De Raedt, L.: Logical settings for concept-learning. Artificial Intelligence 95(1), 187–201 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gebser, M., Kaminski, R., Kaufmann, B., Ostrowski, M., Schaub, T., Schneider, M.: Potassco: The Potsdam answer set solving collection. AI Communications 24(2), 107–124 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gebser, M., Kaminski, R., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T.: Answer Set Solving in Practice. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan and Claypool Publishers (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: ICLP/SLP, vol. 88, pp. 1070–1080 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Inoue, K., Ribeiro, T., Sakama, C.: Learning from interpretation transition. Machine Learning 94(1), 51–79 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimber, T., Broda, K., Russo, A.: Induction on failure: learning connected horn theories. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds.) LPNMR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5753, pp. 169–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Law, M., Russo, A., Broda, K.: Proofs for inductive learning of answer set programs, https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~ml1909/ILASP_Proofs.pdf

  10. Muggleton, S.: Inductive logic programming. New Generation Computing 8(4), 295–318 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Muggleton, S., De Raedt, L., Poole, D., Bratko, I., Flach, P., Inoue, K., Srinivasan, A.: Ilp turns 20. Machine Learning 86(1), 3–23 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Muggleton, S., Lin, D.: Meta-interpretive learning of higher-order dyadic datalog: Predicate invention revisited. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1551–1557. AAAI Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Otero, R.: Induction of stable models. In: Rouveirol, C., Sebag, M. (eds.) ILP 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2157, pp. 193–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ray, O.: Nonmonotonic abductive inductive learning. Journal of Applied Logic 7(3), 329–340 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ray, O., Broda, K., Russo, A.: A hybrid abductive inductive proof procedure. Logic Journal of IGPL 12(5), 371–397 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakama, C., Inoue, K.: Brave induction: a logical framework for learning from incomplete information. Machine Learning 76(1), 3–35 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Law, M., Russo, A., Broda, K. (2014). Inductive Learning of Answer Set Programs. In: Fermé, E., Leite, J. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11557-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11558-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics