Advertisement

Numerical Modelling of the Extratropical Storm Delta Over Canary Islands: Importance of High Resolution

  • O. Jorba
  • C. Marrero
  • E. Cuevas
  • J. M. BaldasanoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

The tropical storm “Delta” was formed on November 23, 2005 in a sea zone of the subtropical Atlantic south of the Azores. After days with an erratic movement, the day 27 the storm reinforced their intensity and accelerated its movement towards the Northeast in the direction of the Canary Islands. On 28 and 29, it made a transition to extratropical storm, affecting the Canary Islands with very strong sustained winds with maximum streak of 152 km/h at the airport of La Palma and close to 250 km/h in the Izaña observatory (2,360 m altitude), which caused significant property damage. The aim of this numerical modelling is to reproduce the local effects of Delta storm with high spatial resolution. The WRF-ARW model is applied from 9 to 3 km of horizontal resolution using ECMWF forecasts as IBC. The simulation reproduces the main features that contributed to the high wind speeds observed. Variations in the vertical static stability, vertical wind shear and intense synoptic winds from the southwest part of Delta with a warm core at 850 hPa were the main features that have contributed to the development and amplification of intense gravitational waves, while the large-scale flow interacted with the complex topography of the islands. Nonhydrostatic and hydrostatic experiments were designed taking into account the settings and domain factors. The results associated with changes relative to a controlled simulation showed that the boundary layer, the horizontal resolution, and the nonhydrostatic option have the greatest impact.

Keywords

Wind Speed Canary Island High Wind Speed Maximum Wind Speed Surface Wind Speed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the AEMET (Spanish Met Office) and the ECMWF for the IFS-ECMWF data and the surface meteorological observations. The simulation was performed with the MareNostrum Supercomputer held by the Barcelona Supercomputing Center-Centro Nacional de Supercomputación.

References

  1. Beven J (2006) Tropical cyclone report on tropical strom delta 22–28 November 2005, NOAA Technical Note TCR-AL292005, Tropical Prediction Center, National Hurricane CenterGoogle Scholar
  2. Doyle JD, Shapiro MA (2000) A multi-scale simulation of an extreme downslope windstorm over complex topography. Meteorol Atmos Phys 74:83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Draxler R, Rolph G (2003) HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website (http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, 15
  4. Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3107Google Scholar
  5. Durran DR (1986) Another look at downslope windstorms. Part I: On the development of supercritical flow in an infinitely deep, continuously stratified fluid. J Atmos Sci 43:2527–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forbes R, Clark P (2003) Sensitivity of extratropical cyclone mesoscale structure to the parametrization of ice microphysical processes. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 129:1123–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Froude L, Bengtsson L, Hodges K (2007) The predictability of extratropical storm tracks and the sensitivity of their prediction to the observing system. Mon Weather Rev 135:315–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jung T, Gulev S, Rudeva I, Soloviov V (2006) Sensitivity of extratropical cyclone characteristics to horizontal resolution in the ECMWF model. Geophys Res Abstr 8:03367Google Scholar
  9. Lilly DK, Zipser J (1972) The front range windstorm of 11 January 1972—a meteorological narrative. Weatherwise 25:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martín F, Alejo C J, de Bustos J J, Calvo F J, San Ambrosio I, Sánchez-Laulhé J M, Santos D (2006) Study of the tropical storm “Delta” and its extratropical transition: meteorological impacts over Canary Islands (27–29 November 2005), Technical Report, Instituto Nacional de Meteorología, MadridGoogle Scholar
  11. Michalakes J, Dudhia J, Gill D, Henderson T, Klemp J, Skamarock W, Wang W (2005) The weather research and forecasting model: software architecture and performance. In: Zwiefhofer W, Mozdzynski G (eds) Proceedings of the eleventh ECMWF workshop on the use of high performance computing in meteorology. World Scientific, pp 156–168Google Scholar
  12. Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102(D14):16 663–16 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Hurricane Center (2006) 2005 Atlantic Hurricane Season available at: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2005atlan.shtml
  14. Noh Y, Cheon WG, Hong SY, Raasch S (2003) Improvement of the K-profile model for the planetary boundary layer based on large eddy simulation data. Bound Lay Meteorol 107:401–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Orlanski I, Katzfey J, Menendez C, Marino M (1991) Simulation of an extratropical cyclone in the southern hemisphere: model sensitivity. J Atmos Sci 48:2293–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peltier WR, Clark TL (1979) The evolution and stability of finite amplitude mountain waves. Part II: surface wave drag and severe downslope winds. J Atmos Sci 36:1498–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prater B, Evans J (2002) Sensitivity of modeled tropical cyclone track and structure of hurricane Irene (1999) to the convective parameterization scheme. Meteorol Atmos Phys 80:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shapiro MA, Keyser D (1990) Fronts, jet streams and the tropopause. In: Newton CW, Holopainen EO (eds) Extratropical cyclones, the Erik Palme’n memorial volume. American Meteorology Society, Boston, pp 167–191Google Scholar
  19. Skamarock W C, Klemp J B, Dudhia J, Gill D O, Barker D M, Wang W, Powers J G (2005) A Description of the advanced research WRF version 2, NCAR Technical note NCAR/TN-468+STRGoogle Scholar
  20. Smirnova TG, Brown JM, Benjamin SG (1997) Performance of different soil model configurations in simulating ground surface temperature and surface fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 125:1870–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smirnova TG, Brown JM, Benjamin SG, Kim D (2000) Parameterization of coldseason processes in the MAPS landsurface scheme. J Geophys Res 105(D3):4077–4086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Warner T, Peterson R, Treadon R (1997) A tutorial on lateral boundary conditions as a basic and potentially serious limitation to regional numerical weather prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:2599–2617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang Y, Chen YL, Kodama K (2005) Validation of the coupled NCEP mesoscale spectral model and an advanced land surface model over the Hawaiian islands. Part II: A high wind event, weather forecast 20:873–895Google Scholar
  24. Zhu H, Thorpe A (2006) Predictability of extratropical cyclones: the influence of initial condition and model uncertainties. J Atmos Sci 63:1483–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zou X, Kuo Y, Low-Nam S (1998) Medium-range prediction of an extratropical oceanic cyclone: impact of initial state. Mon Weather Rev 126:2737–2763CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Jorba
    • 1
  • C. Marrero
    • 2
  • E. Cuevas
    • 2
  • J. M. Baldasano
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Earth Sciences DepartmentBarcelona Supercomputing Center-Centro Nacional de Supercomputación (BSC-CNS)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Izaña Atmospheric Research CenterMeteorological State Agency of Spain (AEMET)Santa Cruz de TenerifeSpain
  3. 3.Environmental Modelling LaboratoryTechnical University of Catalonia (UPC)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations