Advertisement

On the Genus Version of the Basis Problem II: The Case of Oldforms

  • Siegfried BöchererEmail author
Conference paper
  • 648 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 115)

Abstract

A famous result of Waldspurger [22] asserts that for a given square-free level N > 1 we can choose a genus \(\mathfrak{G}\) of positive definite even integral quadratic forms of rank m = 2k with determinant a perfect square such that all newforms of level N can be written as linear combinations of theta series attached to lattices from that genus (m > 4). Later on it was shown [4] that the statement above is true for all genera of lattices of precise level N provided that \(p^{m} \nmid det(\mathfrak{G})\) for all prime divisors of N. Like Waldspurger most other authors working on the basis problem only treat the case of newforms. This seemed to be sufficient, because the oldforms can then be obtained from theta series attached to lattices of lower levels or scaled versions of them (provided that they exist!). Already for prime level and weight congruent 2 mod 4 there is a problem because even unimodular lattices do not exist. The purpose of the present paper is to complete the result of Waldspurger and others by a precise description, which cusp forms beyond the newforms are linear combinations of theta series attached to lattices in a given genus. Due to Siegel’s theorem it is reasonable to restrict attention to cusp forms. The answer is simply “ALL” as long as the genus in question is not maximal or adjoint to maximal at any prime divisor of the level N. It seems that only in these cases the arithmetic of these lattices is “strong enough” to have some influence on the kind of modular forms presented. Locally this is quite natural because (in the case adjoint to the maximal case) the p-modular Jordan-component is anisotropic mod p.

Keywords

Modular Form Prime Divisor Eisenstein Series Cusp Form Theta Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

I wish to thank the referee for pointing out some inaccuracies.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Andrianov, Quadratic Forms and Hecke Operators. Grundlehren, vol. 286 (Springer, New York, 1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Arakawa, S. Böcherer, Vanishing of certain spaces of modular forms and applications. J. Reine Angew. Math. 559, 25–51 (2003)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Böcherer, Über die Fourier-Jacobi- Entwicklung Siegelscher Eisensteinreihen II. Math. Z. 189, 81–100 (1985)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Böcherer, The genus version of the basis problem I, in Automorphic Forms and Zeta Functions, ed. by S. Böcherer, T. Ibukiyama, M. Kaneko, F. Sato (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Böcherer, T. Ibukiyma, The surjectivity of the Witt operator for \(\Gamma _{0}(N)\) for square-free N. Ann. Inst. Fourier 62, 121–144 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Böcherer, G. Nebe, On theta series attached to maximal lattices and their adjoints. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 25, 265–284 (2010)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Böcherer, R. Schulze-Pillot, Siegel modular forms and theta series attached to quaternion algebras. Nagoya Math. J. 121, 35–96 (1991)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Böcherer, R. Schulze-Pillot, On the central critical value of the triple product L-function, in Number Theory 1993–1994 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996), pp. 1–46Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Böcherer, J. Funke, R. Schulze-Pillot, Trace operators and theta series. J. Number Theory 78, 119–139 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Böcherer, H. Katsurada, R. Schulze-Pillot, On the basis problem for Siegel modular forms with level, in Modular Forms on Schiermonnikoog (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Eichler, The basis problem for modular forms and the traces of the Hecke operators, in Modular Functions of One Variable I. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 320 (Springer, New York, 1973)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Freitag, Siegelsche Modulfunktionen. Grundlehren, vol. 254 (Springer, New York, 1983)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K.-I. Hashimoto, On Brandt matrices of Eichler orders. Memoirs School Sci. Eng. Waseda Univ. Nr. 59, 153–165 (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Ibukiyama, On differential operators on automorphic forms and invariant pluriharmonic polynomials. Comment. Math. Univ. St. Pauli 48, 103–118 (1999)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Ibukiyama, S. Wakatsuki, Siegel modular forms of small weight and the Witt operator, in Quadratic Forms-Algebra, Arithmetic and Geometry. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 493 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2009), pp. 181–209Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Klingen, Introductory Lectures on Siegel Modular Forms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Kohnen, A simple remark on eigenvalues of Hecke operators and Siegel modular forms. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 57, 33–35 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Li, Newforms and functional equations. Math. Ann. 212, 285–315 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O.T. O’Meara: Introduction to Quadratic Forms. Grundlehren, vol. 117 (Springer, Berlin, 1973)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Miyake, Modular Forms (Springer, New York, 1989)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Scharlau, Quadratic and Hermitian Forms. Grundlehren, vol. 270 (Springer, Berlin, 1985)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.-L. Waldspurger, L’engendrement par des series de theta de certains espaces de formes modulaires. Invent. Math. 50, 135–168 (1979)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations