Skip to main content

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Tautology Definitions for the Validity of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Implications: An Experimental Study

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Systems'2014

Abstract

The central issue of inference validity, that guarantees the correctness of reasoning and thus that of derived knowledge, depends on the definition of both implication operator and tautology. This paper studies the modus ponens validity in the case of Intuitionistic Fuzzy logic, in an experimental framework: considering 18 classical implication operators, it shows that validity usually does not hold for the classical definition of Intuitionistic Fuzzy tautology. It proposes two alternative, more constrained, tautology definitions, studying them with the same protocol, showing they make it possible to decrease the number of invalid implication operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. STUDFUZZ, vol. 35. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov, K., Gargov, G.: Elements of intuitionistic fuzzy logic: part I. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 95(1), 39–52 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov, K.T.: On some intuitionistic fuzzy implications. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie Bulgare des Sciences 59(1), 19–24 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornelis, C., Deschrijver, G.: The compositional rule of inference in an intuitionistic fuzzy logic setting. In: Striegnitz, K. (ed.) Proceedings of the 13th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, ESSLLI 2001, pp. 83–94 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cornelis, C., Deschrijver, G., Kerre, E.E.: Implication in intuitionistic fuzzy and interval-valued fuzzy set theory: construction, classification, application. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 35(1), 55–95 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Hakeim, K., Zeyada, F.: Comments on some versions of intuitionistic fuzzy propositional calculus due to K. Atanassov and G. Gargov. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 110(3), 451–452 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Negoita, C.V., Ralescu, D.A.: Applications of fuzzy sets to systems analysis. Interdisciplinary Systems Research, vol. 11. Birkhaeuser, Basel (1975)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Detyniecki, M., Lesot, MJ., Moncuquet, P. (2015). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Tautology Definitions for the Validity of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Implications: An Experimental Study. In: Angelov, P., et al. Intelligent Systems'2014. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 322. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11313-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11313-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11312-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11313-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics