Advertisement

Simulating Belief and Action

  • Tom AddisEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing book series (AI&KP)

Abstract

In Chap. 6 we noted that the concept of ‘truth’ was limited to deductive inference only. For other kinds of inference we have introduced the new concept of ‘belief’ to replace ‘truth’. Our approach is now to represent experiments with a computer model that allows for variability in four key components of the scientific process.

Keywords

Shadow box Negotiating Semantics Contingency Ether drift Relativity Belief profiles 

References

  1. Addis TR, Gooding DC (1999) Learning as collective belief-revision: simulating reasoning about disparate phenomena. In: Proceedings: AISB’99, Symposium on scientific creativity, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  2. Addis TR, Gooding DC (2004) Simulation methods for an abductive system in science, in MBR04: model-based reasoning in science and engineering, abduction, visualization, and simulation, University of Pavia, Pavia, December 2004Google Scholar
  3. Gooding DC (1990) Experiment and the making of meaning: human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Kluwer, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gooding DC, Addis TR (1999) A simulation of model-based reasoning about disparate phenomena. In: Magnani L, Nersessian N, Thagard P (ed) Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery. Kluwer, New York, pp 103–123Google Scholar
  5. Gruber H (1985) From epistemic subject to unique creative person at work. Arch Psychol 53:167–185Google Scholar
  6. Holton G (1973a) Einstein, Michelson and the “Crucial” experiment. In: Holton G (ed) The thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 261–351Google Scholar
  7. Holton G (1973b) Influences on Einstein’s early work. In: Holton G (ed) The thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 197–217Google Scholar
  8. Knorr-Cetina K (1981) The manufacture of knowledge. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Poincaré H (1905) The value of science. English Trans. by G. B. Halstead 1913. Reprinted, Dover 1958, p 104Google Scholar
  10. Swenson LS (1970) The Michelson—Morley––Miller experiments before and after 1905. J Hist Astron 1:56–78Google Scholar
  11. Swenson LS (1972) The Etherial Ether: a history of the Michelson Morley Miller experiments. University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
  12. Tweney RD (1985) Faraday’s discovery of induction: a cognitive approach. In Gooding D, James F (ed) Faraday rediscovered. Macmillan, London, pp 189–209Google Scholar
  13. Venn J (1880) On the diagrammatic and mechanical representation of propositions and reasonings. Philo Mag Ser 5 10(59):1880Google Scholar
  14. Wason PC (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Q J Exp Psychol 12:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Portsmouth School of ComputingPortsmouthUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations