Modelling Experiments

  • Tom AddisEmail author
Part of the Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing book series (AI&KP)


Professor David Gooding (Nov 1947–Dec 2009), a science historian, and I worked together for many years on the topic of modelling the science process. These models were validated from examples drawn from history. This chapter presents some of these examples.


Actors Agents Prejudice Rational and irrational sets Expectation 


  1. Addis TR (2000) Stone soup: identifying intelligence through construction. Kybernetes 29:849–870CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Addis T, Billinge D (2004) ‘Music to our ears: a required paradigm shift in computer science’ presented at ECAP04. University of Pavia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  3. Addis TR, Gooding DC (1999) Interacting agents: simulating a community of scientists. Int J Hum Comput Interact (submitted)Google Scholar
  4. Addis TR, Gooding DC (2004, 2008) ‘Simulation methods for an abductive system in science’, in MBR04: model-based reasoning. In: Science and engineering, abduction, visualization, and simulation. University of Pavia, Italy, December 2004. Also in Foundations of Science, Vol 13, No 1, March 2008.Google Scholar
  5. Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N (eds) (1998) Computer simulations in science and technology studies. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahrweiler P, Wörman S (1998) Computer simulations in science and technology studies. In: Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N (eds) Computer simulations in science and technology studies, Springer, Berlin, pp 33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrighi C, Ferrario R (2004) ‘Abductive reasoning, interpretation and collaborative processes’, in MBR04: model-based reasoning. In: Science and engineering, abduction, visualization, and simulation, University of Pavia, Italy, December 2004Google Scholar
  8. Baird D (2004) Thing knowledge: a philosophy of scientific instruments. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  9. Cartwright N (1999) The dappled world: a study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins HM (1985) Changing order. Sage, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins HM (1990) Artificial experts. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. de Chadarevian S, Hopwood N (eds) (2004) Models: the third dimension of science. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Donovan A, Laudan L, Laudan R (eds) (1988) Scrutinizing science: empirical studies of scientific change. Reidel/Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Galison P (1997) Image and logic, a material culture of microphysics. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Galison P, Stump D (1996) The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Giere RN (2004) The problem of agency in scientific distributive cognitive systems. J Cogn Cult 4:759–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gooding DC (1989) How to be a good empiricist. Br J Hist Sci 22:419–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gooding DC (1990) Experiment and the making of meaning. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gooding DC (1996) Creative rationality: towards an abductive model of scientific change. In: Meheus J (ed) Philosophica: creativity, rationality and scientific change, vol 58. pp 73–101Google Scholar
  20. Gooding DC (2004) Cognition, construction and culture: visual theories in the sciences. J Cogn Cult 4:551–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gooding DC, Addis TR (1999) A simulation of model-based reasoning about disparate phenomena. In: Magnani L, Thagard P, Nersessian N (eds) Model based reasoning, Kluwer/Plenum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Gooding DC, Addis TR (2004) Modelling scientific experiments as mediating models, model-based reasoning in science and engineering, abduction, visualization and simulation, MBR’04. Pavia, Italy, December 16–18Google Scholar
  23. Goodwin C (1995) Seeing in depth. Soc Stud Sci 25:237–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gorman ME (1992) Simulating science: heuristics, mental models and technoscientific thinking. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorman ME (2005) The essential and the accidental. Ratio 18(3):276–289Google Scholar
  26. Gorman ME, Tweney RD, Gooding DC, Kincannon AP (eds) (2005) Scientific and technological thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  27. Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanson NR (1958) Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Heintz C (ed) (2004) Studies in cognitive anthropology of science. J Cogn Cult 4(3–4)Google Scholar
  30. Hesse MB (1973) Models of theory change. In: Suppes P et al (eds) Proceedings, 4th international congress of philosophy, logic and methodology of science, Bucharest, pp 379–391Google Scholar
  31. Hesse MB (1974) The structure of scientific inference. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuhn TS (1961) The function of measurement in modern physical science. In: Woolf H (ed) Quantification: a history of the meaning of measurement in the natural and social sciences, Bobbs-Merrill, New York, pp 31–63Google Scholar
  34. Kuhn TS (1974) Second thoughts on paradigms. In: Suppe F (ed) The structure of scientific theories, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 459–82Google Scholar
  35. Laudans L, Donovan A, Laudan R, Barker P, Brown H, Leplin J, Thagard P, Wykstra S (1986) Scientific change: philosophical models and historical research. Synthese 69:141–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynch M, Woolgar S (eds) (1988) Representation in scientific practice. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Matthews R (2004) Opposites detract. New Sci 181(2438):39–43Google Scholar
  38. Morgan M, Morrison MS (1999) Models as mediating instruments. In: Morrison MS, Morgan M (eds) Models as mediators: perspectives on natural and social science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 10–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrison M (1999) Models as autonomous agents. In: Morrison MS, Morgan M (eds) Models as mediators, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 38–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nersessian NJ (2005) Interpreting scientific and engineering practices: integrating the cognitive, social and cultural dimensions. In: Gorman M et al (eds) Scientific and technological thinking, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 17–55Google Scholar
  41. Newell A, Simon HA (1973) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  42. Peirce C (1966) The fixation of belief. In: Weiner PP, Charles S (eds) Peirce: selected writings, Dover, New York, pp 92–260Google Scholar
  43. Pickering A (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency and science. Chicago University Press, ChicagoCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Putnam H (1975) The meaning of meaning. In: Gunderson K (ed) Language, mind and knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 131–93Google Scholar
  45. Salmon W (1990) Rationality and objectivity in science or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes. In: Savage CW (ed) Scientific theories. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 175–204Google Scholar
  46. Simon HA (1981) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions. In: Gasser L, Huhns M (eds) Distributed artificial intelligence, vol 2. Pitman, London, pp 37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Star SL, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19:387–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions. The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Wason PC (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Q J Exp Psychol 12:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wittgenstein L (1921) Tractatus logico-philosophicus (English edition 1961). Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Portsmouth School of ComputingPortsmouthUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations