Advertisement

Knowledge Science

  • Tom AddisEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing book series (AI&KP)

Abstract

Once we have defined and implemented a simple version of intelligence, the problem now arises as to how this might be extended to be useful. One way is to use it in conjunction with the expert knowledge of some professional. To capture this expertise on a computer is particularly important when it comes to rare, expensive or vanishing skills. Intelligence itself is of no real value unless it can be used in the world of human affairs; it is this view that stimulated the idea of an ‘Expert System’. An Expert System is intended to capture the knowledge and skills of an expert in a computer program so that such a program can either replace an expert or amplify a novice’s knowledge to the point of being equivalent to an expert. The questions then arise of how we might harvest this knowledge and represent it in a computer, and how we can use such knowledge.

Keywords

Expert system Taxonomy Heuristic Open and closed inference SFD FDL Human window 

References

  1. Addis TR (1980) Towards an expert diagnostic system. ICL Tech J May:79–105Google Scholar
  2. Addis TR (1985) Designing knowledge-based systems. Originally Kogan Page, then Prentice Hall (1986) ISBN 0-13-201823-3, and also Chapman & Hall, October. Hardback: ISBN 0 85038 859 7. Soft back: ISBN 1 85091 251 3Google Scholar
  3. Addis TR (1989) The science of knowledge: a research programme for knowledge engineering. In: Proceedings of the third European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems (EKAW ‘89), Paris, JuneGoogle Scholar
  4. Addis TR (1990) Knowledge for design. Knowl Acquis 2:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Addis T, Gooding D, Townsend J (1990) A functional description of Faradayʼs discovery of the electric motor. Working Paper, Science Studies Centre, University of BathGoogle Scholar
  6. Addis T, Gooding D, Townsend J (1992) Knowledge design from natural intelligence: an interactive representation of Faraday’s experimental researches. Poster, Joint Councils Initiative Workshop, Imperial College, March 1992Google Scholar
  7. Addis TR, Gooding DC, Townsend JJ (1993) Knowledge acquisition with visual functional programming. In: Knowledge acquisition for knowledge-based systems, 7th European workshop, EKAW ‘93, Toulouse and Caylus, France. 6–10 Sept. Springer, ISBN 3-540-57253-8, ISBN 0-387-57253-8. Lecture Notes in AI 723. BibliographyGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins HM (1975) The TEA set: tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Sci Stud 4:165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins HM (1985) Changing order. Sage, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins HM (1990) Artificial experts. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis R, Shrobe H, Szolovits P (1993) What is a knowledge representation. AI Mag 14(1):17–33, SpringGoogle Scholar
  12. Gooding D (1990a) Mapping experiment as a learning process. Sci Technol Hum Values 15:165–201Google Scholar
  13. Gooding D (1990b) Experiment and the making of meaning. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Gooding D (1990c) Rediscovering skill in science. Bath 3: Technology and Medicine, Bath: Science Studies CentreGoogle Scholar
  15. Gooding D (1992) Putting agency back into experiment. In: Pickering A (ed) Science as practice and culture. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 65–112Google Scholar
  16. Gooding D (1993a) Visualisation in and of science. In: Joint HSS-BSHS-SHOT conference, Toronto, July 1992 and Princeton University workshop on visualisation in science, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  17. Gooding D (1993b) What is experimental about thought experiments? In: Hull D, Forbes M, Okruhlik K (eds) PSA 1992, vol 2, 1993 (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Griesemer JR (1991) Must scientific diagrams be eliminable? The case of path analysis. Biol Philos 6:155–180Google Scholar
  19. Michie D (1979) Problems of the ‘Human Window’. Presented at the AISB summer school on expert systems, Edinburgh, JulyGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Hara RJ (1992) Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biol Philos 7:135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peirce CS (1958) Science and philosophy: collected papers of Charles S. Peirce’, vol 7. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Peirce CS (1966) Charles Peirce: selected writings, edited by Wiener PP. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Pickering A (1989) Living in the material world. In: Gooding D, Pinch TJ, Schaffer S (eds) The uses of experiment: studies on the natural sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 275–297Google Scholar
  24. Polanyi M (1958, 1998) Personal knowledge: towards a post critical philosophy. London: Routledge, p 428Google Scholar
  25. Quinlan JR (1979) Discovering rules by induction from large collections of examples. In: Michie D (ed) Expert systems in the micro electronic age. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 168–201Google Scholar
  26. Shapin S (1989) The invisible technician. Science 77:554–563Google Scholar
  27. Shaw LG, Woodward JB (1990) Modelling expert knowledge. Knowl Acquis 2:179–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strawson PF (1952) Introduction to logical theory. Methuen, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Sutcliffe FE (1968) Descartes: discourse on method and meditations. Penguin Classics, ISBN 0 14 0444.206 5Google Scholar
  30. Thagard H, Hardy S (1992) Visual thinking in the development of Dalton’s atomic theory. In: Proceedings of 9th Canadian conference on AI, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  31. Trumpler M (1992) Converging images: techniques of intervention and forms of representation of sodium channel proteins in nerve cell membranes. Paper for Princeton history of science workshop series on visualisation in the sciences, October 1992Google Scholar
  32. Tweney RD (1985) Faraday’s discovery of induction: a cognitive approach. In: Gooding D, James F (eds) Faraday rediscovered. Macmillan, London, pp 189–209Google Scholar
  33. Tweney RD, Gooding D (1992) “Introduction”, Michael Faraday’s ‘Chemical Notes, Hints, Suggestions and Objects of Pursuit’ of 1822. IEE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Wise MN (1979) The mutual embrace of electricity and magnetism. Science 203:1310–1318MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Portsmouth School of ComputingPortsmouthUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations