Formally identifying intelligence would seem like a gross simplification of what has always seemed a complex and slightly mysterious process. What we have done is created a starting point for our investigation by proposing a concrete description we can then try to use. We will expect that this initial description to be inadequate in explaining many aspects of our experience of intelligence, but it will give us a starting point to grow something better as in the following story. The ‘concrete description’ is the ‘stone’ in the soup.
KeywordsSurprise Action Purpose, Validation Evolution
- Addis T, Addis J (2010) Drawing programs: the theory and practice of schematic functional programming. Springer, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-1-84882-617-5, e-ISBN 978-1-84882-618-2Google Scholar
- Goodwin B (1994) How the leopard changed its spots: the evolution of complexity. Weidenfield & Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Johnson-Laird PN, Wason PC (1977) Thinking: readings in cognitive science. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Shannon CE, Weaver W (1964) ‘The mathematical theory of communication’. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (first published 1949)Google Scholar
- Wason PC, Johnson-Laird PN (1968) Thinking and reasoning. Penguin Modern Psychology UPS 11. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar