Advertisement

Figuratively Speaking

  • Tom AddisEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing book series (AI&KP)

Abstract

Dr. David Billinge, a Computer Science lecturer at Portsmouth University, gives regular pre-concert lectures at the local Guildhall. His interest in music and language raised the question of how the communication of the emotional content of music can be justified using referential semantics. This was particularly puzzling because emotions do not have any externally shared reference points. This apparent lack of external references for emotion raises the interesting primary question, “How can the semantics of emotion ever be established?”

Keywords

Music Emotion Tropic Creative acts Metaphor Artistic descriptions Analogy Metonymy Synecdoche Paradigm Blending Conflict Negotiation Firstness Receptivity Indifference 

References

  1. Addis T, Addis J (2010) Drawing programs: the theory and practice of schematic functional programming. Springer, London. ISBN 978-1-84882-617-5Google Scholar
  2. Addis TR, Gooding DC (1999) Learning as collective belief-revision: simulating reasoning about disparate phenomena. AISB Symposium, 6–9 April. University of Edinburgh, London, pp 19–28. ISBN 1 902956 04 4Google Scholar
  3. Addis TR, Townsend Addis JJ (1995) Diagrams for design: a schema interpreter for knowledge systems. Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the British computer specialists group on expert systems (ES95), pp 231–247Google Scholar
  4. Addis TR, Townsend Addis JJ (1998) A functional schematic interpreter: an environment for model design. Int J Syst Res Inf Sci 7:263–299. ISSN 0882-3014Google Scholar
  5. Addis TR, Townsend Addis JJ (2001) Avoiding knotty structures in design: schematic functional programming. Int J Vis Lang Comput 12:689–715. ISSN 1045 926XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Addis TR, Townsend Addis JJ (2002) An introduction to clarity: a schematic functional language for managing the design of complex systems. Int J Hum Comput Stud 56(4):331–422. ISSN 1071 5819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billinge D (2001) An analysis of the communicability of musical predication, PhD thesis. University of Portsmouth, PortsmouthGoogle Scholar
  8. Billinge D, Addis TR (2001) Some fundamental limits of automated artistic decision making. Symposium on AI and creativity in arts and science, AISB’01. The 2001 convention of the society for the study of artificial intelligence and the simulation of behaviour, 21st–24th March. University of York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Billinge D, Addis TR (2002) Modelling the role of metaphor in artistic description. ECAI, 15th European conference on artificial intelligence, Lyon, France, Workshop 17. Creative systems: approaches to creativity in AI and cognitive science, pp 55–58Google Scholar
  10. Cooke D (1959) The language of music. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Fauconnier G, Turner M (2002) The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gooding DC, Addis TR (1999) A simulation of model-based reasoning about disparate phenomena. In: Magnani L, Nersessian N, Thagard P (eds) Model based reasoning in scientific discovery. Kluwer, London, pp 103–123. ISBN 0-306-46292-3Google Scholar
  13. Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyer LB (1956) Emotion and meaning in music. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Meyer LB (1967) Music, the arts and ideas. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer LB (1973) Exploring music. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Portsmouth School of ComputingPortsmouthUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations