Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Remote Access Systems Recently Developed and Implemented in Australia

  • Conference paper
Privacy in Statistical Databases (PSD 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8744))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

National Statistical Agencies and other data custodians are vital sources of data for research and policy analysis. However, external researchers must be provided with access to data in such a way that privacy and confidentiality are protected. We discuss two recently-implemented research data access systems. The first was developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics for use with certain of its data collections. The second was developed by the Sax Institute, a non-profit health research non-government organisation, for use by population health and health services researchers to analyse complex, linked administrative health and related data sets provided by a range of data custodians. Although these organisations both chose remote access systems, it is interesting that there are significant differences between the two systems. We discuss the drivers for and consequences of the different choices made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Government: National commission of audit. Report, Phase I, http://www.ncoa.gov.au

  2. Chipperfield, J., Lucie, S.: Analysis of micro-data: Controlling the risk of disclosure. Research Paper - Methodology Advisory Committee 1352.0.55.110, Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karr, A., Lee, J., Sanil, A., Hernandez, J., Karimi, S., Litwin, K.: Web-based systems that disseminate information but protect confidentiality. In: McIver, W., Elmagarmid, A. (eds.) Advances in Digital Government: Technology, Human Factors and Public Policy, pp. 181–196. Kluwer, Amsterdam (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Karr, A.F., Dobra, A., Sanil, A.P.: Table servers protect confidentiality in tabular data releases. Commun. ACM 46(1), 57–58 (2003), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/602421.602451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelman, C.W., Bass, A.J., Holman, C.: Research use of linked health data best practice protocol. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 26(3), 251–255 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucero, J., Zayatz, L., Singh, L., You, J., DePersio, M., Freiman, M.: The Current Stage of the Microdata Analysis System at the U.S. Census Bureau. In: Proc. 58th Congress of the International Statistical Institute, ISI 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marsh, C., Skinner, C., Arber, S., Penhale, B., Openshaw, S., Hobcraft, J., Lievesley, D., Walford, N.: The case for samples of anonymized records from the 1991 census. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 154, 305–340 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Office of the Australian Information Commissioner: Annual report 2012-13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Office of the Australian Information Commissioner: Community attitudes to privacy survey (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. O’Keefe, C., Connolly, C.: Privacy and the use of health data for research. Med. J. Aust. 193, 537–541 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Keefe, C., Westcott, M., Ickowicz, A., O’Sullivan, M., Churches, T.: Protecting confidentiality in statistical analysis outputs from a virtual data centre. Working Paper, Joint UNECE/Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality, Ottawa, Canada, October 29-30, 10 p. (2013), http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2013.10.confidentiality.html

  12. Population Health Research Network: website

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sax Institute: Secure Unified Research Environment (SURE). Website, www.sure.org.au

  14. Sax Institute: 45 and up (website), https://www.saxinstitute.org.au/our-work/45-up-study/

  15. Thompson, G., Broadfoot, S., Elazar, D.: Methodology for automatic confidentialisation of statistical outputs from remote servers at the Australian bureau of statistics. Joint UNECE/Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality, Ottawa, Canada, October 28-30, 37 p. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. UK Data Archive: Secure data service (website), securedata.data-archive.ac.uk

  17. University of Chicago: NORC (website), www.norc.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Keefe, C.M., Gould, P., Churches, T. (2014). Comparison of Two Remote Access Systems Recently Developed and Implemented in Australia. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8744. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11257-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11257-2_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11256-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11257-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics