Skip to main content

Attentional Distribution and Spatial Language

  • Conference paper
Spatial Cognition IX (Spatial Cognition 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8684))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Whether visual spatial attention can be split to several discontinuous locations concurrently is still an open and intensely debated question. We address this question in the domain of spatial language use by comparing two existing and three newly proposed computational models. All models are assessed regarding their ability to account for human acceptability ratings for how well a given spatial term describes the spatial arrangement of two functionally related objects. One of the existing models assumes that taking the functional relations into account involves split attention. All new models incorporate functional relations without assuming split attention. Our simulations suggest that not assuming split attention is more appropriate for taking the functional relations into account than assuming split attention. At the same time, the simulations raise doubt as to whether any of the models appropriately captures the impact of functional relations on spatial language use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Posner, M.I.: Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, 3–25 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksen, C.W., Yeh, Y.Y.: Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11, 583–597 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McCormick, P.A., Klein, R., Johnston, S.: Splitting versus sharing focal attention: Comment on Castiello and Umilta. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 350–357 (1992, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yap, J.Y., Lim, S.W.H.: Media multitasking predicts unitary versus splitting visual focal attention. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 889–902 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eimer, M., Grubert, A.: Spatial attention can be allocated rapidly and in parallel to new visual objects. Current Biology 24, 193–198 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jans, B., Peters, J.C., De Weerd, P.: Visual Spatial Attention to Multiple Locations at Once: The Jury Is Still Out. Psychological Review 117(2), 637–684 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlson, L.A., Logan, G.D.: Attention and spatial language. In: Itti, L., Rees, G., Tsotsos, J. (eds.) Neurobiology of Attention, pp. 330–336. Elsevier, San Diego (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlson, L.A., Logan, G.D.: Using spatial terms to select an object. Memory & Cognition 29, 883–892 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Franconeri, S.L., Scimeca, J.M., Roth, J.C., Helseth, S.A., Kahn, L.E.: Flexible visual processing of spatial relationships. Cognition 122, 210–227 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Regier, T., Carlson, L.A.: Grounding Spatial Language in Perception: An Empirical and Computational Investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130(2), 273–298 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C.: Saying, seeing, and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Psychology Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Covey, E.S., Lattanzi, K.M.: “What” Effects on “Where”: Functional Influences on Spatial Relations. Psychological Science 10(6), 516–521 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlson, L.A., Regier, T., Lopez, W., Corrigan, B.: Attention Unites Form and Function in Spatial Language. Spatial Cognition & Computation 6(4), 295–308 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Logan, G.D., Sadler, D.D.: A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Garrett, M., Nadel, L. (eds.) Language and Space, pp. 493–529. M.I.T. Press, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hörberg, T.: Influences of Form and Function on the Acceptability of Projective Prepositions in Swedish. Spatial Cognition & Computation 8(3), 193–218 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hörberg, T.: Influences of Form and Function on Spatial Relations: Establishing functional and geometric influences on projective prepositions in Swedish. Magister thesis, Stockholm University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., Teller, E.: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics 21(6), 1087–1092 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts, S., Pashler, H.: How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 107(2), 358–367 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pitt, M.A., Myung, I.J.: When a good fit can be bad. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(10), 421–425 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schultheis, H., Singhaniya, A., Chaplot, D.S.: Comparing Model Comparison Methods. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kluth, T., Schultheis, H. (2014). Attentional Distribution and Spatial Language. In: Freksa, C., Nebel, B., Hegarty, M., Barkowsky, T. (eds) Spatial Cognition IX. Spatial Cognition 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11214-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11215-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics