Abstract
Spatial reasoning plays a critical role in STEM problem solving. Physics assessments, for example, are rich in diagrams and pictures, which help people understand concrete physical scenarios and abstract aspects of physical reasoning. In this paper we describe a system that analyzes sketched diagrams to solve qualitative physics problems from a popular physics textbook. Causal models describing each problem are formulated via visual and conceptual analyses of the sketched diagrams. We use a combination of qualitative and quantitative reasoning to solve vector addition, tension, and gravitation ranking problems in the introductory chapters of the book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Tversky, B.: What do sketches say about thinking. In: 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, Sketch Understanding Workshop, Stanford University, AAAI Technical Report SS-02-08, pp. 148–151 (2002)
Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–100 (1987)
Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J., Purcell, T.: Seeing into sketches: Regrouping parts encourages new interpretations. In: Gero, J., Tversky, B., Purcell, T. (eds.) Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design II, University of Sydney, Sydney, pp. 207–219 (2001)
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., Tytler, R.: Drawing to learn in science. Science 3, 5 (2011)
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P.: Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 101, 817 (2009)
Chaudhri, V.K., Clark, P.E., Mishra, S., Pacheco, J., Spaulding, A.: Aura: Capturing knowledge and answering questions on science textbooks (2009), http://www.ai.sri.com/pubs/files/1768.pdf
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., Swackhamer, G.: Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher 30, 141 (1992)
Hewitt, P.: Conceptual Physics. Pearson-Addison Wesley, Boston (2010)
Forbus, K., Usher, J., Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., Wetzel, J.: Cogsketch: Sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education. Topics in Cognitive Science 3, 648–666 (2011)
Cohn, A.G., Bennett, B., Gooday, J., Gotts, N.M.: Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning with the region connection calculus. Geoinformatica 1, 275–316 (1997)
Lovett, A., Kandaswamy, S., McLure, M., Forbus, K.: Evaluating Qualitative Models of Shape Representation. In: 26th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (2012)
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D.: The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial intelligence 41,1–63 (1989)
Yin, P., Forbus, K.D., Usher, J.M., Sageman, B., Jee, B.D.: Sketch Worksheets: A Sketch-Based Educational Software System. In: Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI (2010)
Wetzel, J., Forbus, K.: Integrating Open-Domain Sketch Understanding with Qualitative Two-Dimensional Rigid-Body Mechanics. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (2008)
Kim, H.: Qualitative reasoning about fluids and mechanics. Ph.D. dissertation and ILS Technical Report, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1993)
Nielson, P.E.: A qualitative approach to rigid body mechanics. Tech. Rep. No. UIUCDCS-R-88-1469; UILU-ENG-88-1775, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Computer Science (1988)
Forbus, K.D.: Qualitative process theory. Artificial intelligence 24, 85–168 (1984)
Friedman, S.E., Forbus, K.D.: Repairing incorrect knowledge with model formulation and metareasoning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 887–893 (2011)
Klenk, M., Forbus, K.: Analogical model formulation for transfer learning in AP Physics. Artificial intelligence 173, 1615–1638 (2009)
Weld, D.S.: Comparative analysis. Artificial intelligence 36, 333–373 (1988)
Chang, M.D., Wetzel, J., Forbus, K.D.: Qualitative and Quantitative Reasoning over Physics Textbook Diagrams. In: 25th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (2011)
Klenk, M., Forbus, K.D., Tomai, E., Kim, H., Kyckelhahn, B.: Solving everyday physical reasoning problems by analogy using sketches. In: AAAI, p. 209 (2005)
Novak, G.S., Bulko, W.C.: Understanding Natural Language with Diagrams. In: AAAI, pp. 465–470 (1990)
Rajagopalan, R.: Picture semantics for integrating text and diagram input. Artificial intelligence Review 10, 321–344 (1996)
Lockwood, K., Forbus, K.: Multimodal knowledge capture from text and diagrams. In: Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 65–72. ACM (2009)
Graesser, A.C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B.C., Olney, A.: AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions on Education 48, 612–618 (2005)
VanLehn, K., Jordan, P.W., Penstein Rosé, C., Bhembe, D., Böttner, M., Gaydos, A., Makatchev, M., Pappuswamy, U., Ringenberg, M.A., Roque, A.C., Siler, S., Srivastava, R.: The architecture of why2-atlas: A coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 158–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., Wintersgill, M.: The Andes physics tutoring system: Five years of evaluations. In: 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 678–685. IOS Press (2005)
Klenk, M., Forbus, K.: Exploiting persistent mappings in cross-domain analogical learning of physical domains. Artificial Intelligence 195, 398–417 (2013)
Pisan, Y.: An Integrated Architecture for Engineering Problem Solving. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. UMI No. 733042431 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chang, M.D., Wetzel, J.W., Forbus, K.D. (2014). Spatial Reasoning in Comparative Analyses of Physics Diagrams. In: Freksa, C., Nebel, B., Hegarty, M., Barkowsky, T. (eds) Spatial Cognition IX. Spatial Cognition 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11214-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11215-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)